Researchers assess effects of a world awash in nitrogen

Dec 15, 2011

Humans are having an effect on Earth's ecosystems but it's not just the depletion of resources and the warming of the planet we are causing. Now you can add an over-abundance of nitrogen as another "footprint" humans are leaving behind. The only question is how large of an impact will be felt.

In a Perspectives piece in the current issue of Science (Dec. 16, 2011), Arizona State University researcher James Elser outlines some recent findings on the increasing abundance of available nitrogen on Earth. In "A World Awash in Nitrogen," Elser, a limnologist, comments on a new study showing that disruption to Earth's nitrogen balance began at the dawn of the industrial era and was further amplified by the development of the Haber-Bosch process to produce nitrogen rich fertilizers.

Until that time nitrogen, an essential building block to and a major but inert component of its atmosphere, had cycled at low but balanced levels over millennia. That balance ended around 1895.

"Humans have more than doubled the rate of nitrogen inputs into global ecosystems, relative to pre-industrial periods, and have changed the amounts of circulating phosphorus (like nitrogen, a key limiting ingredient for crops and other plants) by about 400 percent due to mining to produce ," Elser said.

The result has been immediate and widespread, he added.

Commenting on a major new finding in Science by G.W. Holtgrieve and colleagues, Elser said that signs of the "new N" appeared in all regions of the in a remarkably coherent manner beginning around 1895, in concert with when and large scale biomass burning accelerated across the globe. Another significant increase came around 1970 coincident with massive increases in industrial nitrogen fixation for fertilizer production, just as the "" got started.

The effects of the high nitrogen inputs "were immediate, and no place in the Northern Hemisphere – not even the highest reaches of the Arctic – was safe," Elser stated.

One effect from the increased nitrogen inputs can be seen in our inland water features like lakes, reservoirs and rivers.

"Nitrogen deposition to lakes leads to phytoplankton (at the base of food chain) with low content of the important nutrient phosphorus," Elser said. "This is kind of like 'junk food,' for animals that eat the phytoplankton. Such effects are likely to ripple upward in the food chain."

"Overall, changes in nutrient regimes (due to human acceleration of the and cycles) cause various problems, but especially reduction in water quality, in water supplies and deterioration of coastal marine fisheries ('dead zones')," Elser added. "In the U.S., conservative estimates indicate that nutrient over-enrichment of inland waters results in about $2.7 billion of annual economic costs annually, due to negative impacts on recreational water usage, waterfront real estate values, the cost of recovery of threatened and endangered species and drinking water provisions."

On a grander timeline the effects could be more telling of humans themselves, Elser said.

"Whether such signals are an ephemeral blip in the stratigraphic record or a sustained shift lasting millennia may, in due time, be seen as an indicator of humanity's success, or failure, in achieving planetary sustainability," he added.

Explore further: Conservation scientists asking wrong questions on climate change impacts on wildlife

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Big data confirms climate extremes are here to stay

6 hours ago

In a paper published online today in the journal Scientific Reports, published by Nature, Northeastern researchers Evan Kodra and Auroop Ganguly found that while global temperature is indeed increasing, so too is the variab ...

Peru's carbon quantified: Economic and conservation boon

6 hours ago

Today scientists unveiled the first high-resolution map of the carbon stocks stored on land throughout the entire country of PerĂº. The new and improved methodology used to make the map marks a sea change ...

How might climate change affect our food supply?

7 hours ago

It's no easy question to answer, but prudence demands that we try. Thus, Microsoft and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) have teamed up to tackle "food resilience," one of several themes ...

Groundwater is safe in potential N.Y. fracking area

7 hours ago

Two Cornell hydrologists have completed a thorough groundwater examination of drinking water in a potential hydraulic fracturing area in New York's Southern Tier. They determined that drinking water in potable ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Nanobanano
1 / 5 (2) Dec 15, 2011
There is 500,000 TONS of Nitrogen in the atmosphere for every person alive.

being a bit ridiculous here.
Eric_B
5 / 5 (2) Dec 15, 2011
i remember 25 years ago my first trip to cape cod.

i was ready to jump in that cold ocean water, until....

little jellyfish EVERYWHERE!!!

agri-runoff feeds algae, huge algae blooms feed jellies, no organisms are going after the jellies...what a mess.
plasticpower
2.5 / 5 (2) Dec 15, 2011
1 on the jellies. A lot of places are full of them. Nothing eats them. Worst part is they have ridiculously long lifespans. Check out these insane Black Sea jellies:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_3QLCKI068K0/SryhtJzPKiI/AAAAAAAATRE/ntzPn4PMGic/s400/03.jpg

Gross
omatumr
1 / 5 (2) Dec 15, 2011
There are 500,000 TONS of Nitrogen in the atmosphere for every person alive.

being a bit ridiculous here.


Careful what you say there, Nanobanano. Big Brother may take your computer too!

http://joannenova...t-838580

Actually you have nothing to fear. The universe is in good hands:

http://dl.dropbox..._Not.pdf

Mahatma Gandhi defeated the British Empire, . . .

a.) Not by having more funds or weapons, but

b.) By doing what is right, and then

c.) Leaving the results to Fate!

The secret of satyagraha - resistance to tyranny through mass civil disobedience - is ahimsa, or total nonviolence.

http://en.wikiped...d_Gandhi

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
www.omatumr.com/ or
http://myprofile....anuelo09

_nigmatic10
not rated yet Dec 16, 2011
Perhaps a better delivery system for fertilizer and a nitrogen filtration device on fossil fuels?
deepsand
5 / 5 (4) Dec 16, 2011
Perhaps a better delivery system for fertilizer ...

Given that the nitrogen in fertilizers is what one is intending to deliver, just how would a "better delivery system" be of any benefit?
... and a nitrogen filtration device on fossil fuels?

Filtration of gaseous combustion products? Were that effective, we'd not have need for catalytic converters on vehicles.