US official says bird flu limits not 'censorship'

Dec 21, 2011 by Jean-Louis Santini

Leading US health official Anthony Fauci on Wednesday rejected claims that the United States is censoring science by seeking to limit potentially dangerous bird flu information in major journals.

The controversy arose when two separate research teams -- one in the Netherlands and the other in the United States -- separately found ways to alter the so it could pass easily between mammals.

Until now, has been rare in humans, but particularly fatal in those who do get sick. H5N1 first infected humans in 1997 and has killed more than one in every two people that it infected, for a total of 350 deaths.

Based on fears that a deadly could result if the mutant flu escaped a lab or if a terror group were to find out how to make it, a US on Tuesday urged to hold back key details.

The data "clearly has public health benefit but it has the potential to be used in nefarious ways by some people," said Fauci, who heads the National Institute of Allergy and .

The National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB), made up of 23 non-governmental experts, voted unanimously that studies should be published in the journals Science and Nature, but with limited information.

Fauci said that any "legitimate" researchers would be able to seek the full details for their own study.

"If their credentials are appropriate they will have access to that information. So it's not like ," he told AFP.

"It's only for those people who have a need to know and have a legitimate purpose for it, as opposed to just throwing it out there so that anybody can do whatever they want," he added.

"It's absolutely not because if you are a scientist and you have the need to know... you will definitely get that information."

The two research teams were funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health, and are in the process of working out changes to their manuscripts with the journals Nature and Science.

Fauci also said that fears of what the mutant virus might do have been overblown. For instance, just because it could be passed easily between ferrets does not necessarily mean it could be as easily transmitted between humans.

"There is a little bit of an overreaction," he said, calling reports of a "monster virus" a "bit dramatic."

The real concern is that H5N1 might mutate in nature and become an that humans could catch and transmit easily, so knowing what those flu features might look like is an important research and surveillance tool, he said.

"We could give that information to the people who are out of the field doing the surveillance, the health officials in Vietnam, Indonesia or China... so they will have a better chance of recognizing as the virus starts to evolve," he said.

"So the scientific question is very legitimate."

Fauci said the NSABB's request for redaction was the first time the advisory committee had made such an appeal, and acknowledged that it was not popular in all corners of the science world.

"There are many scientists who don't agree with the committee. So we need to re-look at what the rational for that decision was, so we can all get together in an open and a transparent way, come up with some more concrete guidelines of what needs to be looked in these cases," he said.

"That is going to trigger some interesting dialogue, I believe."

Explore further: How researchers are speeding up seed production for new wheat

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Killer flu virus threat over-hyped: Dutch scientist

Dec 21, 2011

A top Dutch scientist heading a team which created a mutant killer flu virus Wednesday said the threat to global biosecurity is being overplayed, even if full research results are published.

Details of lab-made bird flu won't be revealed (Update)

Dec 20, 2011

The U.S. government paid scientists to figure out how the deadly bird flu virus might mutate to become a bigger threat to people - and two labs succeeded in creating new strains that are easier to spread.

World vigilant after Dutch lab mutates killer virus

Dec 09, 2011

World health ministers said Friday they were being vigilant after a Dutch laboratory developed a mutant version of the deadly bird flu virus that is for the first time contagious among humans.

Scientists fight back in 'mutant flu' research row

Dec 21, 2011

Leading virologists on Wednesday warned of censorship after a US bioterror watchdog asked scientific journals to withhold details of lab work that created a mutant strain of killer flu.

Recommended for you

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

chardo137
1 / 5 (1) Dec 22, 2011
Only the government would say that not allowing the publication of data is not censorship. Probably justified, but a smart person wouldn't say that it wasn't censorship!
dan42day
not rated yet Dec 22, 2011
There are times when most rational people would agree that certain information should not be published to the world at large.

In this case it does not seem to represent an insurmountable obstacle to legitimate research, although some idealistic dreamers may rant and rave about it on phylosophical grounds

I would only ask that anyone in disagreement with this comment include their bank routing number, account number and PIN in order to show their commitment to their point of view.

Actually, don't do that. I don't want to spend hours being interrogated by the police if someone does ding your accout!