US bill targets exports of Web censorship tools

Dec 09, 2011
A journalist looks at a computer screen in November 2011 in London. A bill aimed at choking off US exports of technology used for Internet surveillance or censorship was introduced in the House of Representatives on Thursday.

A bill aimed at choking off US exports of technology used for Internet surveillance or censorship was introduced in the House of Representatives on Thursday.

"It's unconscionable that US technology is putting at risk," said Representative Chris Smith, a Republican from New Jersey who is behind the Global Online Freedom Act.

"US companies should not, knowingly or unwittingly, be providing the technology used by repressive regimes to hunt down and punish .

"This bill will stop the vicious merry-go-round we are now on of exporting Internet-restricting technologies from the US that we then have to spend millions of dollars helping activists circumvent," Smith said.

The legislation would prohibit American companies from exporting hardware or software that could be used for online surveillance or censorship to nations that restrict the Internet.

It would also require Internet companies listed on US to disclose to American regulators their practices in collecting and sharing personally identifiable information and steps taken to notify users when removing content.

"This will apply not only to US companies but to the increasing number of foreign IT companies that raise capital here on our stock exchanges, including a large number of Chinese Internet companies that will soon have to report their practices to the ()," Smith said.

At a hearing of the House Subcommittee on Africa, and Human Rights, Smith said the Internet has been transformed over the past few years "from a freedom plaza to dictator's best friend."

"Every day we learn of more democratic activists being arrested through the use of a growing array of and surveillance tools, abused by the governments of China, Belarus, Egypt, Syria and many other countries," he said.

Clothilde Le Coz, Washington director of Paris-based , told the hearing the legislation was a welcome step towards making companies more responsible and should be matched by similar efforts in Europe.

"There is a criminal cooperation between Western hi-tech companies and authoritarian regimes," Le Coz said.

"The surveillance tools sold by these companies are used all over the world by armed forces, intelligence agencies, democratic governments and repressive regimes.

"The leading exporters of these technologies include the United States, France, Germany, Italy, United Kingdom and Israel," she said. "Companies should have a responsibility when selling their technologies abroad."

Another witness, Elisa Massimino, president and chief executive of Human Rights First, said many companies "really have not gotten their heads around what it means to be responsible for the end use of their products."

"Companies have to feel that they're being watched," Massimino said.

Explore further: Digital dilemma: How will US respond to Sony hack?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US lawmakers seek action on Internet freedom

Mar 09, 2010

US lawmakers from the two major parties on Tuesday issued a joint call for government action to ensure Internet freedom overseas amid alarm at China's cyber-censorship.

U.S. calls for fall of Great Firewall

Feb 16, 2006

Lawmakers voiced concern over U.S. Internet companies fostering censorship in China in order to secure a place in the lucrative Chinese market.

US senator wants Baidu to stop censorship

May 04, 2011

Assistant Senate majority leader Richard Durbin is calling on leading Chinese Internet firm Baidu to protect human rights and stop censoring search results.

Recommended for you

Digital dilemma: How will US respond to Sony hack?

Dec 18, 2014

The detective work blaming North Korea for the Sony hacker break-in appears so far to be largely circumstantial, The Associated Press has learned. The dramatic conclusion of a Korean role is based on subtle ...

UN General Assembly OKs digital privacy resolution

Dec 18, 2014

The U.N. General Assembly has approved a resolution demanding better digital privacy protections for people around the world, another response to Edward Snowden's revelations about U.S. government spying.

Online privacy to remain thorny issue: survey

Dec 18, 2014

Online privacy will remain a thorny issue over the next decade, without a widely accepted system that balances user rights and personal data collection, a survey of experts showed Thursday.

Spain: Google News vanishes amid 'Google Tax' spat

Dec 16, 2014

Google on Tuesday followed through with a pledge to shut down Google News in Spain in reaction to a Spanish law requiring news publishers to receive payment for content even if they are willing to give it away.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

kochevnik
1 / 5 (2) Dec 09, 2011
Great now such tools can be custom tailored for the domestic "repressive regime" in the "homeland."
Dichotomy
5 / 5 (1) Dec 09, 2011
Its not as though they won't be able to get similar tools from the Russians, Chinese, or other countries who engage in aggressive internet censorship.
kochevnik
1 / 5 (2) Dec 09, 2011
Its not as though they won't be able to get similar tools from the Russians, Chinese, or other countries who engage in aggressive internet censorship.
That's funny. I really hadn't noticed that I was being censored in Russia. I was under the impression that it was Americans censoring me on Gawker, pajamas.com etc. But now I know it was the KGB and Anna Chapman. Thanks for letting me know. Now I am a wiser person thanks to you.
MarkyMark
not rated yet Dec 10, 2011
Its not as though they won't be able to get similar tools from the Russians, Chinese, or other countries who engage in aggressive internet censorship.
That's funny. I really hadn't noticed that I was being censored in Russia. I was under the impression that it was Americans censoring me on Gawker, pajamas.com etc. But now I know it was the KGB and Anna Chapman. Thanks for letting me know. Now I am a wiser person thanks to you.
Need i point out the scandal surrounding your recent ( fixed? ) election?
kochevnik
1 / 5 (1) Dec 12, 2011
Need i point out the scandal surrounding your recent ( fixed? ) election?
And that is somehow different or more extreme than your fixed elections? Russia may block web servers but the USA targets citizens themselves as the enemy. 220 federal agencies seize private property without any due process whatsoever. By that measure Russia is more free place.
Vendicar_Decarian
not rated yet Dec 12, 2011
"Need i point out the scandal surrounding your recent ( fixed? ) election?"- Markie

You mean the election where the fixer lost?

What happened in the U.S. in Ohio and Florida. I seem to remember Al Gore winning the election in the U.S.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.