Apple applies for two fuel cell patents for use with portable computing devices
December 23, 2011 by Bob Yirka
An image from the second patent.
(PhysOrg.com) -- In a move that demonstrates Apple’s determination to create an ever lighter Macbook that is also more environmentally friendly, the company has applied for two different patents that describe ways to use a fuel cell to power a portable computing device, which could of course also include devices like an iPad. In the patent applications, Apple also took the unusual step of adding some bit of political discourse to underscore its motivations in trying to build portable computing devices that are not reliant on fossil fuels.
Fuel cells are of course, a means for generating electricity by pushing compressed hydrogen though a membrane and mixing it with oxygen in the air. The only other output is water. It’s a technology that has been widely proposed as an alternative means for powering cars and trucks, but thus far, has not caught on to the extent that some had hoped.
In these latest patent filings, Apple is proposing a fuel cell that can be integrated directly into a portable device, rather than, as other’s have proposed, a means of charging it. Thus, the device would never need recharging at all, instead it would need a have its recyclable fuel cartridges refilled. The patent diagrams also show that the design for such a system that would also employ a small rechargeable a battery that would be charged by the fuel cell, but could also send a charge back to run the fuel cell. Such a system could in theory run for days, or even weeks before having to replace the fuel cartridge.
One of the major stumbling blocks for implementation of widespread fuel cell technology is the lack of an infrastructure to support it. If Apple were to sell hydrogen fuel cell powered Macbooks, they would also have to develop a means for creating the fuel to fill the cartridges and for selling them through their Apple stores, which they likely are investigating as well.
Not mentioned in the patent application is what Apple would do with the very small amount of water that the fuel cell would produce. Cleary simply pumping it out the bottom of a Macbook wouldn’t work, and storing it would add weight. They might also be working on a way to force it to evaporate, but that might be subject to environmental humidity levels. In any case, it’s clear that Apple understands the hurdles it faces as was also noted in the patent applications by the authors discussing how it is “extremely challenging” to figure out a way to create a hydrogen fuel cell system that would be both portable and in the end, cheap enough that the resulting device would still be price competitive. Thus, a fuel cell based Macbook likely is still a ways off into the future.
More information: Fuel Cell System to Power a Portable Computing Device
Fuel Cell System Coupled to a Portable Computing Device
via AppleInsider
© 2011 PhysOrg.com
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Need a rigid insulation material???
21 hours ago
-
magnets or EMF in car bumpers to protect from fender bender
May 26, 2012
-
length of wire in a coil of known dimensions?
May 25, 2012
-
India Engineering Powerhouse
May 25, 2012
-
electromagnet core dereference between hard and soft iron
May 25, 2012
-
Measuring water pressure in an open tank
May 24, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Engineering
More news stories
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
14 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
3
Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study
Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
3.6 / 5 (25) |
56
|
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22
Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (12) |
18
Stunning image of smallest possible five-ringed structure
Scientists have created and imaged the smallest possible five-ringed structure about 100,000 times thinner than a human hair and you'll probably recognise its shape.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
and power THAT whole process with renewable energy sources. Otherwise, what's the point? Oh, I get to *DRIVE* to an Apple store to buy another cartridge? A store that is powered by COAL burning, usually? A store with an inventory delivered by burning diesel fuel?
I'm not knocking the patent idea; just making a point. This could be very useful one day, AFTER we solve the biggest problem in history.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 0.5 / 5 (26)
"Since there are now nanocoatings that make electronics impervious to water, one obvious way to dissipate fuel cell moisture is to use it as an evaporative coolant for the CPU and GPU." - socean
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 0.3 / 5 (26)
Who?
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 0.8 / 5 (28)
Or you could have another in your pants pocket.
A better solution would just allow you to syringe a couple of ounces of fuel from a bottle and fill up the fuel cell reservoir directly - Apple would never do that since it would negate their ability to suck money from your wallet.
And that is the true problem that must be overcome. Allowing society to become beholden to companies that design products to serve their corporate interests rather than those of society.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Decent idea, afaik. Maybe there's still no patent for a universal portable fuel cell that works across a range of low voltages. (nah, Apple's probably submitted that one, too) I'm not an electrical engineer, so I have no idea what are the logistical or technical road blocks to that.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Apple didn't patent a new fuel cell, they patented combining any generic fuel cell with any generic electronic device. What crap.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 0.5 / 5 (26)
They litigated against Microsoft for many years on those two issues alone.
"Apple didn't patent a new fuel cell, they patented combining any generic fuel cell with any generic electronic device. What crap." - fbf
You will note that the design incorporates a communication connector to the electronic computing device itself. This communication connector will be used to make sure that only Apple sourced fuel can be used in it's apple products.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 0.3 / 5 (25)
This thread is full of good ideas.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
"Hey watch it buddy I only needed an ounce!!!"
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Unless a totally new technology has sprung up in the last couple days, membrane-based fuel-cells use liquid hydrocarbons.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
The biggest problem being solved is that battery's run out in a few handful of hours. Having a power source that last days or weeks would be wonderful. The rest of the stuff you are talking about is silly.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
It's a well known fact that all the big problems in science today haven't been solved yet because the PhD students doing the work all lost their theses the day before it was due because their MacBook battery went flat resulting in Word corrupted the files.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
It sickens me to see the patent system used in this way as it's no longer about protecting your investment in R&D but about building the biggest pile of patent crap to threaten your competitors with knowing that they will not be able to afford to defend themselves.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I really don't see anything unique, novel, or that wouldn't be obvious to someone in the industry, or even those not in the industry.
I have to wonder if those previous articles that were published qualify as prior art, as well as the early prototypes those guys were messing with.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
This means that whatever "compressed hydrogen" they use to power the cell - it must be produced first. Somewhere. By far the most common industrial-scale source of hydrogen today is water electrolysis.
Now stop to think about that - first, we use electicity to split water into the hydrogen and oxygen. Release the oxygen into the air and compress hydrogen (more electricity used to compress).
Then we recombine the said hydrogen and oxygen back into the same water to produce the same electricity.... Except a lot less of it than we originally spent.
In other words - it's a kind of a chemical battery, it's NOT an energy source. And, while a good quality battery may be great (I'm not disputing THAT possibility), it's definitely not an energy source.
So... Just where did the original power came from?
Dec 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 26, 2011
Rank: 0.1 / 5 (24)
Now how could that be when some apple Fanboy just 2 months ago claimed here that Apple was a great supporter of open source software and hardware?
He couldn't be delusional could he?
Dec 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Delusional would be a mild version defining such a statement. As such, i can only assume you are making a joke.