World has five years to avoid severe warming: IEA
November 9, 2011 by Marlowe Hood
The Belchatow power plant is seen in September 2011 in Poland. The world has just five years to avoid being trapped in a scenario of perilous climate change and extreme weather events, the International Energy Agency (IEA) warned on Wednesday.
The world has just five years to avoid being trapped in a scenario of perilous climate change and extreme weather events, the International Energy Agency (IEA) warned on Wednesday.
On current trends, "rising fossil energy use will lead to irreversible and potentially catastrophic climate change," the IEA concluded in its annual World Energy Outlook report.
"The door to 2.0 C is closing," it said, referring to the 2.0 Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) cap on global warming widely accepted by scientists and governments as the ceiling for averting unmanageable climate damage.
Without further action, by 2017 the total CO2 emissions compatible with the 2.0 C goal will be "locked in" by power plants, factories and other carbon-emitting sources either built or planned, the IEA said.
Global infrastructure already accounts for more than 75 percent of that limit.
To meet energy needs while still averting climate catastrophe, governments must engineer a shift away from carbon-intensive fossil fuels, the agency said bluntly.
Traffic is seen amid floodwaters in Bangkok. Scientists who have modelled the impacts on biodiversity, agriculture and human settlement say the world would be close to unlivable due to violent extremes of drought, flooding, heatwaves and storms.
"As each year passes without clear signals to drive investment in clean energy, the 'lock-in' of high-carbon infrastructure is making it harder and more expensive to meet our energy security and climate goals," said IEA chief economist Fatih Birol.The report outlines two scenarios for future energy consumption and emissions of greenhouse gases.
A "new policies" scenario incorporates existing government promises into a projection up to 2035.
A "450 scenario" lays out a timetable for curbing carbon emissions so that atmospheric concentration of CO2 stays under 450 parts per million (ppm), roughly equivalent to the 2.0 C target.
The current level is about 390 ppm.
A woman wears a mask as she rides a bicycle in Beijing in October 2011.
Even taking into account current commitments, CO2 emitted over the next 25 years will amount to three-quarters of the total emitted since 1900, leading to a 3.5 C (6.3 F) average increase in temperature since that date.Business-as-usual emissions would put the world "on an even more dangerous track toward an increase of 6.0 C (10.8 F)," the report says.
Scientists who have modelled the impacts on biodiversity, agriculture and human settlement say a 6 C world would be close to unlivable due to violent extremes of drought, flooding, heatwaves and storms.
The planet's average temperature has risen by about 1.0 C (1.8 F) over the last century, with forecasts for future warming ranging from an additional 1.0 C to 5.0 C (9.0 F) by 2100.
The report forecasts a one-third jump in primary energy demand by 2035, with 90 percent of this growth in developing economies.
Half of that demand will likely be met by increased use of coal, the most carbon-intensive of all major fossil fuels.
China -- already the world's top coal consumer -- is on track to use nearly 70 percent more energy than the United States by that date, it says.
Even under the "new policies" scenario progress toward a low-carbon economy will be halting.
The share of fossil fuels in global primary energy consumption falls from around 81 percent today to 75 percent in 2035, while renewables increase from 13 percent of the mix today to 18 percent.
This scenario already assumes a huge boost in subsidies for renewables, from $64 billion today to $250 billion in 2035.
"One wonders how many more worrying figures the world needs," commented Connie Hedegaard, the European Union's climate commissioner.
The report "shows that the world is heading for a fossil-fuel lock-in. This is another urgent call to move to a low-carbon economy," she said in a statement.
Setting a global price on carbon, slashing fossil fuel subsidies, boosting renewable energy and energy efficiency and revised tax codes are all tools for achieving that end, she added.
(c) 2011 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
21 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
4 hours ago |
3.7 / 5 (3) |
5
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
6 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (5) |
12
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
6 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (15) |
41
Stunning image of smallest possible five-ringed structure
Scientists have created and imaged the smallest possible five-ringed structure about 100,000 times thinner than a human hair and you'll probably recognise its shape.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Scientists develop ultra-sensitive test that detects diseases in their earliest stages
Scientists have developed an ultra-sensitive test that should enable them to detect signs of a disease in its earliest stages, in research published today in the journal Nature Materials.


Nov 09, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (12)
Nov 09, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (18)
Nov 09, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (10)
Nov 09, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (12)
Nov 09, 2011
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (16)
The problem with drawing this kind of line on the calendar is twofold: first, you could be off, even significantly, and the denier types will use that for fuel. Second and, more importantly, the average person on the street who does not understand the issue will view this type of message as ideological, alarmist and "radical", and get very little further useful information from it.
Nov 09, 2011
Rank: 2.9 / 5 (15)
Nov 09, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
Nov 09, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (9)
In my opinion the only viable solution is massive improvement in the technology and cost-effectiveness of non-fossil-fuel energy. As Google puts it: "Make a kwh from solar cheaper than a kwh from coal". It will happen eventually, but not in 5 years. However, the new era could be brought in much faster by heavy investment in research, development, and demonstration.
Nov 09, 2011
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (10)
Good luck to us!
Nov 10, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (10)
Nov 10, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
The liberty to adapt. That will not go over well for Americans.
Nov 10, 2011
Rank: 3.6 / 5 (5)
Well, at least some people are smart enough to understand the reality.
It sure seems like if everyone pulled their heads out of the sand (their asses) for a minute we could earmark a few trillion dollars into SPECIFIC and PROVEN tech like solar concentrating plants and the newest solar PV and wind power. However we'd need to be realistic about the commissioning of such large scale changes. Think AHEAD and realize we may need to remove such infrastructure in the near future and reprocess the materials. Especially since tech efficacy seems to be exponential.
Nov 10, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (15)
Solar is nice, if the sun would shine 24/7. The storage costs more than the generation facility. More unicorn farts and pixie dust.
"The polar bears (continue) to be fine." -Freeman Dyson.
Nov 10, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Nov 10, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (9)
Nov 10, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (6)
Shall we all just commit Sepukku right away?
Nov 10, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 10, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
http://www.homefa...uel.html
http://mominer.ms...hildren/
Nov 10, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Haha, cut-and-paste! But I don't blame you. His stuff is mostly cut-and-paste.
Nov 10, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Perhaps justice will be serve only if Judge William Adams presides over the final proceedings.
Nov 11, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (4)
Nov 11, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Nov 11, 2011
Rank: 3.1 / 5 (10)
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (9)
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Being an economist, the "Climate Change" part of his portfolio does not include questioning anything the IPCC says.
It in fact depends on their (the IPCC's) continued alarmism.
Otherwise that part of his portfolio would disappear.
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Perhaps they are releasing alarmist rhetoric because they are themselves alarmed? They have to live on Earth with the rest of us, so I imagine they are pretty much crapping themselves with fear right now.
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Here's a link to the video. I suggest you watch it:
http://www.iea.or...B43C.flv
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
Intelligence is just degraded instinct.
Follows entropy.
Instinct was before intelligence, so intelligence is DEGRADED instinct.
As a species we're stupid, and our collective suicide has, is, and will be repeated in the Universe for as long as it exists.
Illumination...
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Celebrate the winter Solstice. Take back what Christianity has stolen.
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
You speak as if you're just going to watch it happen. But guess what, you're going down with the rest of us.
People act like this is an argument they can win or lose. Global warming is not just some topic for intellectual debate, it's a real disaster, and it's on it's way RIGHT NOW.
If someone was pointing a gun at your child, would you start a debate about whether the gun was real or not? Ok, the gunman shoots the floor and it leaves a crater. The gun is clearly real. THAT is the level of evidence we now have that anthropogenic global warming is happening.
Now realize that YOU are pointing that gun at your own child. Because by refusing to accept the evidence, which has been accepted by 98% of scientists, you are putting your kids in danger. It's that simple.
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Given that the result Denialist Koch Brothers funded (BEST) global temperature analysis has found the IPCC analysis to represent "excellent" science, on what basis should anyone have to suspect that the IPCC the NOAA, NASA, or any other agency who has reported nearly identical findings, being wrong?
All the Denialists have left are lies and their faith in Conservative Political Ideology.
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Not possible. The people of China would be extinct at that point, as well as everyone else not living at the north and south polls.
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (9)
Conservatives might Consider it. The alternative is to be part of the hunt for them and the bloody retribution that follows once they are caught and punished for their crimes against nature and man.
It is only a few years away, and I have my list ready.
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
"No one takes the UN, or any of its offices, seriously." - Shootist
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (8)
Yes. By then you will have either changed your opinion or will be in hiding out of fear of bloody retribution for your criminal level of stupidity.
I look forward to the improvements in the gene pool.
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
- «You speak as if you're just going to watch it happen. But guess what, you're going down with the rest of us.»
Nope.
I know bloody well I'm gonna be part of it.
I'm just stating facts.
As individuals, we can have Genius. As a species, we just can't. As a species we're dumb as a doorknob.
So we are committing collective suicide for little green papers that have no real existence outside our deluded small, very small intellects.
And hoping that the vast herds of semi-concious apes that make the bulk of humanity, will somehow become sufficiently intelligent, in time to avoid extinction, is, frankly... wishful thinking.
We will kill ourselves trying to keep alive an economic system we created, and refuse to question or change.
That's it.
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (6)
Translation - There is no such thing as global warming.
Criminality has consequences. Treason has consequences.
The consequences of your denialism will be death.
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Dinosaurs lasted 165 million years on instinct.
Humans, with their "superior" intelligence, will be lucky to last 200,000 years.
And besides our fossils, we'll leave A LOT of garbage...
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
It has been doing so for many millions of years.
It is actually similar to our spring, summer,autumn and winter except that it is on a much larger time scale
Presently we are in the spring of this process and have yet to enter its summer.
So whether we humans exist or don't exist the climate will continue to warm until it reaches its summer maximum.
The questions scientists should be asking are a) is human activity adding to the speed of the warming process?, b)can we halt our input?, c) are we able to remove any input we have added to this process?
I suspect that the answers will be a) Yes, b) Yes and c) NO
I suspect that whatever we add to the speed of this process can never be removed, it simply has to wait until it reaches its maximum or its tipping point and it will then start to cool and the cooling process will continue until we have a full ice age then the global warming process will recommence.
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
so, you and your kind are the ones who shrug and wait patiently for the climate to right itself because your kind have nothing to do with it, and it will right itself. Riight. Your kind will stick by your principles and do nothing when the whole planet heats up? I don't see your kind sit in Zen-like repose when the temperature hit 110 without turning the AC on...and complained when the grid gave up by overloads.
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Thorium is a pretty common material, and it's safer than burning fossil fuels. MOREOVER, the US has tonnes of it, and its refining comes with production of rare-earths (it'd be nice to break the Chinese monopoly on those).
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Thorium is a pretty common material, and it's safer than burning fossil fuels. MOREOVER, the US has tonnes of it, and its refining comes with production of rare-earths (it'd be nice to break the Chinese monopoly on those).
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Gore has done a great job investing in the things he correctly believes in and profiting from those investments.
Jealousy will get you no where.
Now if Gore didn't invest his own money in these projects you would be whining about him not believing in the science because he wasn't willing to put his money where his mouth is.
So Gore just makes for a convenient excuse for your ignorant denialist whining.
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
But that still doesn't address the fact that many of those calling for the others to change their life style to reduce carbon emissions are living very high on the hog and contributing much more than the others they are complaining about. If Gore and others certainly believe in the message they were prophesying they wouldn't be flying around in private jets or as with John Kerry when he was running for president be driving around in so gas guzzler that he claims he didn't own and be preaching to me that I am ruining the environment by not driving a more fuel efficient car.
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
And you can invest in them too. You are just too stupid to do so. Hence your whining at Gore's great success.
"he also calls on government to secure his investment" - bmerc
Which investments are those. Be specific in your accusations lest you be pegged as a liar.
"many of those calling for the others to change their life style to reduce carbon emissions are living very high on the hog" - bmerc
Gore sits on the board of directors of Apple computer, and is involved in the operations of at least a dozen businesses. He is active politically, and in the campaign to change the worlds energy supply and consumptive habits.
He lives a pretty active life compared to a petty wage slave like yourself. I grant him permission to consume more than you on that basis.
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Sorry Tard Boy. But your whining makes little sense. Gore has already changed the course of history for the better, and has prompted millions of people to reduce their consumption. On that basis alone, he has more than offset his own consumption.
If you can suggest a more energy efficient way to get the same results, then suggest it now.
We are waiting...
Somehow I don't think that if Gore were to spend his days sitting on the couch doing nothing would get anything accomplished.
Just look at the vast amount of nothing you have done with your life.
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
For an entertaining and devastating critique of the alleged science behind the AGW argument, check out this video:
http://blog.ameri...science/
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
James Burke's "After the Warming"
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
Your convincing new evidence isn't even convincing to the researchers produced it as they claimed that their results say Nothing about cloud formation. The particle sizes they produced were far too small to act as nucleation sites for the growth of clouds.
You have been lied to by your source. Only a Dummy would believe a liar.
Nov 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
http://democrats....162.html
Professor Curry's blog has comments from readers:
http://judithcurr...t-137664
Since the end of skepticism is the end of the scientific method, as one of the early commenters notes, this Congressional hearing may simply confirm that AGW is more politics than science.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
http://myprofile....anuelo09
Nov 14, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Nov 14, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
:face palm:
Nov 14, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
I have come to the conclusion that American Republicans are examples of perfect ignorance and perfect corruption, and nothing but death will alter that fact.
Nov 14, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
You keep buying the BS, pal.
Nov 15, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
You do realize you're all on the same team, yes?
Nov 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Nov 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Do you ever stop for just a half second and think of writing something that is logical, to-the-point, factual, organized, non-emotional, and non-hateful? Oh, wait....guess not.
Anyway, it was really funny how you removed the part of my post where I said I don't have any problem with the IEA premise, and then you just put the part where I said I disagreed with how they released their findings.
See, this makes you an angry little man, whose goal in life is to get a few uber-geeks on a science website to pay attention to you, regardless of the truth or factual content of whatever you say!
I've said it before Vendicar, but they make pills for your condition, and behavior therapy would be appropriate.