Whales in the desert: Fossil bonanza poses mystery

Nov 19, 2011 By EVA VERGARA and IAN JAMES , Associated Press

(AP) -- More than 2 million years ago, scores of whales congregating off the Pacific Coast of South America mysteriously met their end.

Maybe they became disoriented and beached themselves. Maybe they were trapped in a lagoon by a landslide or a storm. Maybe they died there over a period of a few millennia. But somehow, they ended up right next to one another, many just meters (yards) apart, entombed as the shallow sea floor was driven upward by geological forces and transformed into the driest place on the planet.

Today, they have emerged again atop a desert hill more than a kilometer (half a mile) from the surf, where researchers have begun to unearth one of the world's best-preserved graveyards of prehistoric whales.

Chilean scientists together with researchers from the Smithsonian Institution are studying how these whales, many of the them the size of buses, wound up in the same corner of the .

"That's the top question," said Mario Suarez, director of the Paleontological Museum in the nearby town of Caldera, about 700 kilometers (440 miles) north of Santiago, the Chilean capital.

Experts say other groups of prehistoric whales have been found together in Peru and Egypt, but the Chilean fossils stand out for their staggering number and beautifully preserved bones. More than 75 whales have been discovered so far - including more than 20 perfectly intact skeletons.

They provide a snapshot of at the time, and even include what might have been a family group: two adult whales with a juvenile between them.

"I think they died more or less at the same time," said Nicholas Pyenson, curator of fossil marine mammals at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History. Pyenson and Suarez are jointly leading the research.

As for why such a great number perished in the same place, Pyenson said: "There are many ways that whales could die, and we're still testing all those different hypotheses."

The scientists have yet to publish their findings about the fossil bed and the extensive remains, which began to emerge in June last year during a highway-widening project that is now on hold.

So far, the fossils have been found in a roadside strip the length of two football fields - about 240 meters (260 yards) long and 20 meters (yards) wide.

Pyenson said the spot was once a "lagoon-like environment" and that the whales probably died between 2 million and 7 million years ago.

Most of the fossils are baleen whales that measured about 8 meters (25 feet) long, Pyenson said.

The researchers also discovered a sperm whale skeleton and remains of a now-extinct dolphin that had two walrus-like tusks and previously had only turned up in Peru, he said.

"We're very excited about that," Pyenson said in a telephone interview. "It is a very bizarre animal."

Other unusual creatures found elsewhere in the fossil-rich Atacama Desert include an extinct aquatic sloth and a seabird with a 5-meter (17-foot) wingspan, bigger than a condor's.

Erich Fitzgerald, a vertebrate paleontologist at Museum Victoria in Melbourne, Australia, emailed that the latest find is very significant.

"The fossils are exceptionally well preserved and quite complete - a rare combination in paleontology and one that will likely shed light on many facets of the ... ecology and evolution of these extinct species," Fitzgerald said.

He said it's possible "these fossilized remains may have accumulated over a relatively long period of time."

Hans Thewissen, an expert on early whales, agreed. Another scenario, he said, is that the whales might have gathered in a lagoon and then an earthquake or storm could have closed off the outlet to the ocean.

"Subsequently the lagoon dries up and the whales die," said Thewissen, a professor of anatomy at Northeast Ohio Medical University. He said the accumulation of so many complete skeletons is "a very unusual situation."

"If this were a lagoon that dried up, you might see signs that ocean water evaporated," such as crystallized salt and gypsum in the rock, said Thewissen, who is not involved in the research. "On the other hand, if a giant wave or storm flung the whales onto shore, it would also have pushed the ocean floor around, and you would see scour marks in the rocks."

Dating fossils is complicated, experts said, and it will be very hard to distinguish dates precisely enough to determine whether the whales all died simultaneously.

The researchers have been told to finish their onsite studies so that fossils can be moved out of the path of the widened Pan American Highway, or Route 5, which is Chile's main north-south road.

Many of the fossils have been transported in plaster coverings to the museum in Caldera. Researchers from Chile's are also studying the fossils.

Pyenson and his team are working quickly under tents to document the intact skeletons. With funding from the National Geographic Society, the Smithsonian team is using sophisticated photography and laser scanners to capture 3D images of the whales that can later be used to make life-sized models of them.

Suarez, the paleontologist, had long known about the whale bones just north of Caldera - they could be seen jutting out of the sandstone ridge alongside the highway at the spot known as Cerro Ballena, or Whale Hill. When the road work began last year, the construction company asked him to monitor the job to avoid destroying fossils.

"In the first week, about six or seven whales appeared," Suarez said. "We realized that it was a truly extraordinary site."

The Chilean government has declared the site a protected zone, and Pyenson said he hopes a museum will be built to showcase the intact skeletons where they lie, in the same way fossils are displayed at Dinosaur National Monument in Utah and Colorado.

Suarez thinks there are probably fossils of hundreds of waiting to be uncovered - enough to keep him working at this one spot for the rest of his life.

"We have a unique opportunity to develop a great scientific project and make a great contribution to science," he said.

Explore further: Remains of French ship being reassembled in Texas

More information:
Smithsonian researchers' blog: http://nmnh.typepad.com/pyenson-lab/

Chile's National Museum of Natural History (Museo Nacional de Historia Natural): http://www.dibam.cl/historia-natural/

4.7 /5 (10 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Giant predatory whale named for 'Moby Dick' author

Jun 30, 2010

(AP) -- Scientists have discovered an ancient whale whose bite ripped huge chunks of flesh out of other whales about 12 million years ago - and they've named it after the author of "Moby Dick."

Whales evolved biosonar to chase squid into the deep

Sep 05, 2007

Behind the sailor's lore of fearsome battles between sperm whale and giant squid lies a deep question of evolution: How did these leviathans develop the underwater sonar needed to chase and catch squid in ...

Recommended for you

Remains of French ship being reassembled in Texas

Oct 24, 2014

A frigate carrying French colonists to the New World that sank in a storm off the Texas coast more than 300 years ago is being reassembled into a display that archeologists hope will let people walk over ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

thuber
4.2 / 5 (5) Nov 20, 2011
My theory is that they were killed in a whale nuclear war, which is why whales today have not redeveloped nuclear weapons. They simply do not trust each other anymore.
kevinrtrs
1.2 / 5 (9) Nov 20, 2011
Maybe they became disoriented and beached themselves. Maybe they were trapped in a lagoon by a landslide or a storm. Maybe they died there over a period of a few millennia

Let's ask some questions: 1. How do (whale) fossils form - slowly over many years or suddenly and catastrophically in an extremely short space of time? 2. If over many years then just how does the skeleton stay intact and how does other parts remain preserved without scavengers and biodegradation destroying the carcass? 3. If over many years, how does one whale get fossilised and then gets joined by a whole football field of others in the same place and presumably depth and the same covering? 4. If over many years, how soon will a whole whale be covered from bottom to top? Will there be signs of erosion from bottom to top?
5. If the whales died in the same place at the same time and were covered or buried very quickly by tons of left-over watery sediment, what would be the tell-tale signs of such an event?
kevinrtrs
1 / 5 (5) Nov 20, 2011
The researchers have been told to finish their onsite studies so that fossils can be moved out of the path of the widened Pan American Highway, or Route 5, which is Chile's main north-south road.

Sounds like the Hitch Hiker's Guide disaster to me. If people had known about these whales for so long, why didn't they get some funding prior to this?
"Subsequently the lagoon dries up and the whales die," said Thewissen, a professor of anatomy at Northeast Ohio Medical University. He said the accumulation of so many complete skeletons is "a very unusual situation.

Begs the question shown above. This situation is just as unusual as finding 10 000 plus dinosaurs in the bone yards that stretch from Alaska down to Montana . Just how does so many HUGE creatures die in one place and get fossilised at about the same level? Because of their size it stands to reason that they could NOT have been covered over a great period of time, bit by bit from the bottom up. It had to be all at once
barakn
3.8 / 5 (8) Nov 20, 2011
1. Yes.
2. Have you ever seen a whale carcass? They're huge. Even when scavengers are around they don't disappear overnight. On an Oregon beach in 1970, a dead whale proved to be such a problem that they decided to blow it up with dynamite http://www.youtub...ottYDpEE
3. Not difficult to imagine - a shallow bay slowly filling in with sediment for example. Your "presumably at the same depth" presumes too much. You're too lazy to look for modern examples, but it's well documented that certain locations cause repeated strandings of whales and dolphins. Try this for a reference: http://books.goog...;f=false
4. You're too lazy to look for modern examples, but I'm not. Here's a picture of some virtually pristine whale bones that are about to be completely buried http://www.eridin...ones.jpg
barakn
3.3 / 5 (7) Nov 20, 2011
5. You're talking about catastrophic burial with a large amount of sediment. In such circumstances, there is no reason why a carcass would necessarily be buried in a horizontal position - it very well could be buried vertically. No such thing was found here - it's so unusual it would have been mentioned had it been found. Furthermore it would be highly unlikely that the bodies would be neatly arranged, but amongst the fossils in question they found two adults with a juvenile between them, such a neat arrangement that they were able to postulate it was a family group. You are completely ignorant of the basics of biology, so I'll let you in on a little secret - cetaceans often die in mass strandings where family groups or entire pods die together lined up neatly on the beach http://www.carefo...andings/
barakn
3.4 / 5 (5) Nov 20, 2011
why didn't they get some funding prior to this?
A few exposed bones in a developing country won't necessarily attract much attention, plus leaving fossils in their original rock matrix is often the most efficient way to store them.
Just how does so many HUGE creatures die in one place and get fossilised at about the same level?
I'm not sure where you got the "10 000 plus dinosaurs in the bone yards that stretch from Alaska down to Montana" figure, but I am intimately familiar with the bonebed near Choteau, Montana, which alone contains over 10,000 individuals. How did they die? Not in a flood, but in volcanic ash.
Humpty
2.3 / 5 (3) Nov 20, 2011
Jesus wanted the whales to come to heaven, that is why he commanded them to die, so they could live with him in low earth orbit.
kenter
not rated yet Nov 21, 2011
According to the article, the Smithsonian curator believes they were all buried at one time (as kevinrtrs indicates), while the Museum Victoria paleontologist thinks they may have accumulated over a relatively long time (as barakn indicates).

Seems to me that if the experts can disagree, there's more than enough question about it to not be dogmatic either way.