UAE court jails five Internet activists

Nov 27, 2011
Ahmed Mansoor with Sarah Leah Whitson of Human Rights Watch at a news conference in Dubai in January
A United Arab Emirates court on Sunday sentenced a blogger and four other democracy activists to prison terms after finding them guilty of charges including insulting the Gulf state's leaders. The State Security Court handed the blogger, Ahmed Mansoor (pictured), a three-year prison sentence and the four others each received two years. They have no recourse to appeal.

A United Arab Emirates court on Sunday sentenced a blogger and four other Internet activists to prison terms after finding them guilty of charges including insulting the Gulf state's leaders.

The Federal Supreme Court handed the , Ahmed Mansoor, a three-year and the four others each received two years. They have no recourse to appeal.

The court, which acts as the State Security Court, also ordered the shutting down of the Hiwar (Dialogue) Internet forum which was used by the activists.

Mansoor was convicted along with Nasser bin Gaith, who lectures at the Abu Dhabi branch of the Sorbonne University, and activists Fahid Salim Dalk, Hassan Ali Khamis and Ahmed Abdul Khaleq.

The five, who were arrested in April, were accused of using the Internet to insult UAE leaders, of calling for a boycott of September's Federal National Council elections and over anti-government demonstrations.

Their trial was criticised earlier this month as "grossly unfair" by a coalition of seven rights groups including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, which called for the five to be freed.

But the Supreme Court pressed ahead announcing its verdict.

The five defendants, described by sympathisers as reformists, had refused to show up in court, saying in a message delivered by a police officer that the court "did not enable them to defend themselves."

The defendants are said to be still on a hunger strike which they began earlier this month.

"This is a horrible decision. A complete miscarriage of justice," said Human Rights Watch representative Samer Muscati, who attended the trial.

"This shows that in the UAE you are not guaranteed a fair trial," he added, charging that the trial was "flawed from day one," and pointing out that lawyers "couldn't cross-examine witnesses."

He also criticised the verdict as harsh, pointing out that previous cases in which people were charged based on Article 176 of the UAE's penal code were dealt with as misdemeanours, not at a security court.

Amnesty International said in a statement on Sunday it considers the "UAE5" to be prisoners of conscience.

"The defamation charges the UAE5 faced are not internationally recognisable criminal offences and the trial process has been grossly flawed from the outset," said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, Amnesty’s Middle East and North Africa deputy director.

"The UAE’s authorities must end this travesty of justice without further delay by ordering the immediate release of these five activists and expunging any ‘criminal record’ as a result of this inexplicable verdict."

Outside the court, Khalifa al-Nuaimi, a relative of bin Ghaith, said the verdict was "shocking and harsh."

"We expected a verdict of not guilty, based on the evidence presented," he said, claiming that only one of seven witnesses brought in by the prosecution linked the defendants to statements made on the Internet.

"We call upon our sheikhs to pardon them. They are their children," he said.

But around 200 people gathered in a park opposite the court building disagreed.

Witnesses said one crossed the street and struck Nuaimi in the face.

"This verdict in itself could be considered a pardon," said Hamad Jaber, who had come from the city of Al-Ain to join the rally against the activists.

"I was expecting more," he said, adding he had come to "protest the acts of Mansoor and his collaborators" for "threatening the security and stability of the country and insulting the leaders."

Government employee Mohammed al-Hossani, 33, also said the verdict was lenient.

"This was a case of incitement, not just a matter of expressing opinion," he said.

"We trust our leadership which gives the people what they deserve. It never failed us," he added, praising the oil-rich government that provides a cradle-to-grave care to its citizens.

Debate over the verdict quickly became rife on micro-blogging website Twitter.

"The flags of freedom fly half mast today in my country," read one tweet lamenting the verdict. "The activists today... won and the judicial system has lost," read another.

But many also hailed the verdict and denounced the defendants.

"Congratulations for the verdict against the five traitors," wrote one contributor.

Explore further: Twitter takes note of other apps on smartphones

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Court Denies Vonage Bid for Patent Case Retrial

May 04, 2007

A U.S. appeals court denies a request by Internet phone company Vonage Holdings that it order a retrial in the patent infringement case brought against it by Verizon Communications.

Swedish Pirate Bay appeals trial wraps up

Oct 15, 2010

Defence lawyers wrapped up an appeals trial Friday of three founders and a financier of Swedish filesharing site The Pirate Bay, demanding that their clients' earlier guilty verdicts be overturned.

Patent infringement verdict restored against Microsoft

Jan 05, 2011

A US appeals court restored a verdict that found Microsoft infringed on a patent for an anti-piracy technology owned by a competitor, Uniloc USA. But the court did not reaffirm a 388-million-dollar jury award.

German court orders wireless passwords for all

May 12, 2010

(AP) -- Germany's top criminal court ruled Wednesday that Internet users need to secure their private wireless connections by password to prevent unauthorized people from using their Web access to illegally download data.

Recommended for you

UN moves to strengthen digital privacy (Update)

Nov 25, 2014

The United Nations on Tuesday adopted a resolution on protecting digital privacy that for the first time urged governments to offer redress to citizens targeted by mass surveillance.

Spotify turns up volume as losses fall

Nov 25, 2014

The world's biggest music streaming service, Spotify, announced Tuesday its revenue grew by 74 percent in 2013 while net losses shrank by one third, in a year of spectacular expansion.

Virtual money and user's identity

Nov 25, 2014

Bitcoin is the new money: minted and exchanged on the Internet. Faster and cheaper than a bank, the service is attracting attention from all over the world. But a big question remains: are the transactions ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Bob_B
5 / 5 (4) Nov 27, 2011
Hey, all you leaders in the UAE...you suck, you are idiots, you deserve insults. You are not leaders. You are idiots, afraid you may lose your money and all the money you can steal from your citizens in the future. You leaders are not human, but animals with stinking bad breath and your burps are disgusting - they should have come from your ass like your beliefs about free speech.
Jotaf
3 / 5 (2) Nov 27, 2011
The same thing will happen to Assange if he's tried in the US.
"National security" is a free pass to convict anyone these days! Just don't kick the hornet's nest.
Humpty
1 / 5 (2) Nov 27, 2011
OK - purveyor of crap copy paste journalism, what was it that the accused actually did?

Alcedine
not rated yet Nov 27, 2011
I'm only really surprised by the outcry.

Though not quite as bad as its neighbour Saudi Arabia (whose legal system is, apparently, more or less an uncodified, interpreted sharia), UAE tends to inhabit the sedimentary layer whenever freedom indices are made. While I admit to having a general disenchantment with the world, surely this is not entirely unexpected.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.