A tiny flame shines light on supernovae explosions

November 22, 2011

A tiny flame shines light on supernovae explosions

Enlarge

This figure shows four snapshots in time as the flame propagates initially subsonically outward reaching a specified density (green) at which point the flame transitions to a detonation. Shown in color is a reaction progress variable describing the burning of nuclear statistical quasi-equilibrium (NSQE) products to nuclear statistical equilibrium (NSE) products. The blue contour marks the separation between the previously convective core and the isothermal outer layer. Note that the scale of the right-most figure is larger than the other three.

Starting from the behavior of small flames in the laboratory, a team of researchers has gained new insights into the titanic forces that drive Type Ia supernova explosions. These stellar explosions are important tools for studying the evolution of the universe, so a better understanding of how they behave would help answer some of the fundamental questions in astronomy.

Type Ia supernovae form when a white dwarf star – the left-over cinder of a star like our Sun – accumulates so much mass from a companion star that it reignites its collapsed stellar furnace and detonates, briefly outshining all other stars in its host galaxy. Because these have a characteristic brightness, astronomers use them to calculate cosmic distances. (It was by studying Type Ia supernovae that two independent research teams determined that the expansion of the Universe was accelerating, earning them the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics).

To better understand the complex conditions driving this type of supernova, the researchers performed new 3-D calculations of the turbulence that is thought to push a slow-burning flame past its limits, causing a rapid detonation -- the so-called deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT). How this transition might occur is hotly debated, and these calculations provide insights into what is happening at the moment when the makes this spectacular transition to supernova. "Turbulence properties inferred from these simulations provides insight into the DDT process, if it occurs," said Aaron Jackson, currently an NRC Research Associate working in the Laboratory for Computational Physics and Fluid Dynamics at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, D.C. At the time of this research, Jackson was a graduate student at Stony Brook University on Long Island, New York.

Jackson and his colleagues Dean Townsley from the University of Alabama at Tuscaloosa, and Alan Calder also of Stony Brook, will present their data at the American Physical Society's (APS) Division of Fluid Dynamics (DFD) meeting in Baltimore, Nov. 20-22, 2011.

While the deflagration-detonation transition mechanism is still not well understood, a prevailing hypothesis in the astrophysics community is that if turbulence is intense enough, DDT will occur. Extreme turbulent intensities inferred in the white dwarf from the researchers' simulations suggest DDT is likely, but the lack of knowledge about the process allows a large range of outcomes from the explosion. Matching simulations to observed supernovae can identify likely conditions for DDT.

"There are a few options for how to simulate how they [supernovae] might work, each of which has different advantages and disadvantages," said Townsley. "Our goal is to provide a more realistic simulation of how a given supernova scenario will perform, but that is a long-term goal and involves many different improvements that are still in progress."

The researchers speculate that this better understanding of the physical underpinnings of the explosion mechanism will give us more confidence in using Type Ia supernovae as standard candles, and may yield more precise distance estimates.

More information: The talk, "Turbulence and Combustion in Type Ia Supernovae," is on Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2011. Abstract: http://absimage.ap … 1-001839.pdf

Provided by American Institute of Physics

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

rawa1
Nov 22, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
I'm not sure, the burst of supernova can be modelled with fluid dynamics, because the dynamics of charged particle system (i.e. the plasma) differs significantly from the behaviour of neutral gas due the lack of magnetic fields. For example, the neutral fluid will never form the artefacts similar to sun spots.
aroc91
Nov 22, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
I'm not sure, the burst of supernova can be modelled with fluid dynamics, because the dynamics of charged particle system (i.e. the plasma) differs significantly from the behaviour of neutral gas due the lack of magnetic fields. For example, the neutral fluid will never form the artefacts similar to sun spots.


Where is it implied that can't, and hasn't been modeled?
Callippo
Nov 22, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Technically, you can model the nanotubes with cat whiskers for example, but the result will not be quite relevant from physical perspective, not to say about cost of computer time and people involved.
Parsec
Nov 24, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Technically, you can model the nanotubes with cat whiskers for example, but the result will not be quite relevant from physical perspective, not to say about cost of computer time and people involved.

So... just so I understand the implication here, your implying that computer modeling is a waste of time and manpower? Have you ever noticed that you consistently get rated a 1 out of 5 on the merit scale for your comments? You might try thinking about what you post before you post.
rawa1
Nov 24, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
your implying that computer modelling is a waste of time and manpower?
Of course at the case, you're modelling the the behaviour of charged particles in plasma with neutral ones. It's like modelling the behaviour of fluid with behaviour of gas, etc. Important aspect of system behaviour is missing, the results are unphysical, therefore the simulation is waste of money of tax payers from its very beginning.

Is it so difficult to understand it?
aroc91
Nov 26, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
your implying that computer modelling is a waste of time and manpower?
Of course at the case, you're modelling the the behaviour of charged particles in plasma with neutral ones. It's like modelling the behaviour of fluid with behaviour of gas, etc. Important aspect of system behaviour is missing, the results are unphysical, therefore the simulation is waste of money of tax payers from its very beginning.

Is it so difficult to understand it?


Refer to my first post again.
Rank 4 /5 (1 vote)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?

(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (18) | comments 43 | with audio podcast feature

Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed

(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon – ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (22) | comments 51 | with audio podcast

Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector

Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 4 / 5 (7) | comments 16 | with audio podcast

Hawaii lab turns laser-powered bubbles into microrobots

(Phys.org) -- A team of scientists from the University of Hawaii are working on microrobots created from bubbles of air in a saline solution. The bubbles take on their title of “robots” as a laser ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (4) | comments 2 | with audio podcast weblog

Sound increases the efficiency of boiling

Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...

Physics / Soft Matter

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 2


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study

(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.