Shift in ancient diet may explain modern orthodontic problems

Nov 22, 2011 by Bob Yirka report
Analysis of sexual dimorphism. PCA of form (rescaled Procrustes variables). Image (c) PNAS, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113050108 (see the paper for more details)

(PhysOrg.com) -- Many a parent has lamented the crowding of their children’s teeth indicating impending orthodontia bills, but few no doubt have wondered quite as deeply as Noreen von Cramon-Taubadel, an anthropologist from the U.K., on why this seems to be such a common malady for modern people. After some digging, as she explains in her paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, it might all be due to humans long ago moving from being primarily hunter-gatherers to farmers or more aptly, to societies that eat the crops that farmers produce.

It all comes down, von Cramon-Taubadel says, to the fact that farmed food requires less work in chewing, resulting in less jaw muscle, which over time means shorter jaws. But alas, neither the size nor number of teeth has changed over the same period of time resulting in overcrowding.

von Cramon-Taubadel came to this conclusion after studying skull and associated jaw specimens from eleven different early human populations stored in museums around the world. Of those eleven, five were representative of primarily hunter-gatherer type people’s, while the other six groups primarily relied on food obtained from farming. In her studies, she found that hunter-gatherer groups on the whole tended to have longer jawbones than did those that had resorted to depending on farmed foods. The thinking is, she says, that longer jawbones work better in dealing with hard to chew food, such as meat and some wild vegetation.

The shift from hunting-gathering to farming happened in many areas of the world some 10,000 years ago, and is widely accepted to be one of the main stepping stones to civilization. Many scientists over the years have theorized that the move to farming likely led to shorter jaws, but this is apparently the first time anyone’s thought to actually test the theory.

Realizing that the shorter she’d found in her study of museum specimens could have come about for other reasons, von Cramon-Taubadel next began looking for other ways the specimens could have been correlated, i.e. geography, genetics or weather patterns and could find none. The only thing she could find in common among the groups was the way they obtained their food. Thus, she concludes that it seems reasonable to deduce that or modern dental crowding is likely the result of our ancestors move to farming and the foods we have relied on since then.

Explore further: New hadrosaur noses into spotlight

More information: Global human mandibular variation reflects differences in agricultural and hunter-gatherer subsistence strategies, PNAS, Published online before print November 21, 2011, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113050108

Abstract
Variation in the masticatory behavior of hunter-gatherer and agricultural populations is hypothesized to be one of the major forces affecting the form of the human mandible. However, this has yet to be analyzed at a global level. Here, the relationship between global mandibular shape variation and subsistence economy is tested, while controlling for the potentially confounding effects of shared population history, geography, and climate. The results demonstrate that the mandible, in contrast to the cranium, significantly reflects subsistence strategy rather than neutral genetic patterns, with hunter-gatherers having consistently longer and narrower mandibles than agriculturalists. These results support notions that a decrease in masticatory stress among agriculturalists causes the mandible to grow and develop differently. This developmental argument also explains why there is often a mismatch between the size of the lower face and the dentition, which, in turn, leads to increased prevalence of dental crowding and malocclusions in modern postindustrial populations. Therefore, these results have important implications for our understanding of human masticatory adaptation.

Related Stories

Study shows genetic rice breeding goes back 10,000 years

Jun 07, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- In a paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Masanori Yamasaki and colleagues from Kobe University in Japan, describe how they analyzed the genomes of severa ...

Recommended for you

New hadrosaur noses into spotlight

Sep 19, 2014

Call it the Jimmy Durante of dinosaurs – a newly discovered hadrosaur with a truly distinctive nasal profile. The new dinosaur, named Rhinorex condrupus by paleontologists from North Carolina State Univer ...

Militants threaten ancient sites in Iraq, Syria

Sep 19, 2014

For more than 5,000 years, numerous civilizations have left their mark on upper Mesopotamia—from Assyrians and Akkadians to Babylonians and Romans. Their ancient, buried cities, palaces and temples packed ...

New branch added to European family tree

Sep 17, 2014

The setting: Europe, about 7,500 years ago. Agriculture was sweeping in from the Near East, bringing early farmers into contact with hunter-gatherers who had already been living in Europe for tens of thousands ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tadchem
5 / 5 (1) Nov 22, 2011
I was once informed by an archaeologist that the domestication of grains changed the character of fossil human teeth in that pre-grain diet produced teeth almost free of caries, but showing heavy abrasion of the occlusal surfaces. When people started eating grains regularly, the pasty residue stuck in the nooks and crannies of the teeth led to the flourishing of enamel-eroding bacteria. They also used fewer root vegetables for dietary carbohydrates, reducing the abrasive dirt that wore down the molars. As far as mandible size is concerned, I believe the development of a more upright posture, balancing the skull atop the spine with the foramen magnum more forward, would select for a smaller jaw to reduce crowding of the throat area and concomitant restricting of breathing and swallowing.
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (2) Nov 22, 2011
This was observed years ago and is documented in the "Metabolic Typing Diet".
Aborigial people who ate their traditional diets had better teeth.
deatopmg
2.3 / 5 (3) Nov 22, 2011
The author should read the reports of Weston A. Price, a dentist who traveled extensively in the U.S. southwest and Australia in the early part of the 20th century. His main observation was that the facial bone structure of those natives who had remained on their traditional diets, whether hunter gatherer or mixed farming/hunter gatherer, was robust enough to accept all the teeth without crowding and that carries was non-existent. Just the opposite of those same native groups who had adopted a "modern" diet.