Research sparks record-breaking solar cell performances
November 7, 2011 by Lynn Yarris
Contrary to conventional scientific wisdom, the key to solar cell efficiency is not absorbing more photons but emitting more photons. (Image courtesy of DOE NREL)
(PhysOrg.com) -- Theoretical research by scientists with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) has led to record-breaking sunlight-to-electricity conversion efficiencies in solar cells. The researchers showed that, contrary to conventional scientific wisdom, the key to boosting solar cell efficiency is not absorbing more photons but emitting more photons.
A great solar cell also needs to be a great Light Emitting Diode, says Eli Yablonovitch, the Berkeley Lab electrical engineer who led this research. This is counter-intuitive. Why should a solar cell be emitting photons? What we demonstrated is that the better a solar cell is at emitting photons, the higher its voltage and the greater the efficiency it can produce.
Yablonovitch holds joint appointments with Berkeley Labs Materials Sciences Division and the University of California (UC) Berkeley, where he is the James and Katherine Lau Chair in Engineering, and also directs the NSF Center for Energy Efficient Electronics Science. He is the corresponding author of a paper describing this work for the Journal of PhotoVoltaics titled Intense Internal and External Fluorescence as Solar Cells Approach the Shockley-Queisser Efficiency Limit.
Co-authoring this paper with Yablonovitch were Owen Miller of Berkeley Lab, and Sarah Kurtz, at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
In their paper, Yablonovitch, Miller and Kurtz describe how external fluorescence is the key to approaching the theoretical maximum efficiency at which a solar cell can convert sunlight into electricity. This theoretical efficiency, called the Shockley-Queisser efficiency limit (SQ Limit), measures approximately 33.5-percent for a single p-n junction solar cell. This means that if a solar cell collects 1,000 Watts per square meter of solar energy, the most electricity it could produce would be about 335 Watts per square meter.
Calculations by Miller, who is a member of Yablonovitchs research group, showed that the semiconductor gallium arsenide is capable of reaching the SQ Limit. Based on this work, a private company co-founded by Yablonovitch, Alta Devices Inc., has been able to fabricate solar cells from gallium arsenide that have achieved a record conversion efficiency of 28.4 percent.
Thin film solar cells fabricated from gallium arsenide have achieved a record sunlight-to-electricity conversion efficiency of 28.4 percent. (Image courtesy of Alta Devices, Inc.)
Owen Miller provided an accurate theory on how to reach the SQ Limit that for the first time included external fluorescence efficiency, Yablonovitch says. His calculations for gallium arsenide showed that external fluorescence provides the voltage boost that Alta researchers subsequently observed.
Solar or photovoltaic cells represent one of the best possible technologies for providing an absolutely clean and virtually inexhaustible source of electricity. However, for this dream to be realized, solar cells must be able to efficiently and cost-competitively convert sunlight into electricity. They must also be far less expensive to make.
The most efficient solar cells in commercial use today are made from monocrystalline silicon wafers and typically reach a conversion efficiency of about 23-percent. High grade silicon is an expensive semiconductor but is a weak collector of photons. Gallium arsenide, although even more expensive than silicon, is more proficient at absorbing photons, which means much less material is needed to make a solar cell.
Gallium arsenide absorbs photons 10,000 times more strongly than silicon for a given thickness but is not 10,000 times more expensive, says Yablonovitch. Based on performance, it is the ideal material for making solar cells.
Past efforts to boost the conversion efficiency of solar cells focused on increasing the number of photons that a cell absorbs. Absorbed sunlight in a solar cell produces electrons that must be extracted from the cell as electricity. Those electrons that are not extracted fast enough, decay and release their energy. If that energy is released as heat, it reduces the solar cells power output. Millers calculations showed that if this released energy exits the cell as external fluorescence, it would boost the cells output voltage.
This is the central counter-intuitive result that permitted efficiency records to be broken, Yablonovitch says.
As Miller explains, In the open-circuit condition of a solar cell, electrons have no place to go so they build up in density and, ideally, emit external fluorescence that exactly balances the incoming sunlight. As an indicator of low internal optical losses, efficient external fluorescence is a necessity for approaching the SQ Limit.
Using a single-crystal thin film technology developed earlier by Yablonovitch, called epitaxial liftoff, Alta Devices was able to fabricate solar cells based on gallium arsenide that not only smashed previous solar conversion efficiency records, but can be produced at well below the cost of any other solar cell technology. Alta Devices expects to have gallium arsenide solar panels on the market within a year.
The SQ Limit is still the foundation of solar cell technology, says Yablonovitch. However, the physics of light extraction and external fluorescence are clearly relevant for high performance solar cells.
Yablonovitch believes that the theoretical work by he and his co-authors, in combination with the performance demonstrations at Alta Devices, could dramatically change the future of solar cells.
Were going to be living in a world where solar panels are very cheap and very efficient, Yablonovitch says.
More information: For more information about the research of Eli Yablonovitch, visit the Website at http://optoelectro … erkeley.edu/
Provided by
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Need a rigid insulation material???
22 hours ago
-
magnets or EMF in car bumpers to protect from fender bender
May 26, 2012
-
length of wire in a coil of known dimensions?
May 25, 2012
-
India Engineering Powerhouse
May 25, 2012
-
electromagnet core dereference between hard and soft iron
May 25, 2012
-
Measuring water pressure in an open tank
May 24, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Engineering
More news stories
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
14 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
3
Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study
Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
3.6 / 5 (25) |
56
|
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22
Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (12) |
18
Stunning image of smallest possible five-ringed structure
Scientists have created and imaged the smallest possible five-ringed structure about 100,000 times thinner than a human hair and you'll probably recognise its shape.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.

Nov 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
http://gigaom.com...ovation/
"Alta has achieved 28.2 percent efficiency"
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (9)
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 4.9 / 5 (18)
Really? Let's use my local Walmart as an example and do some estimating...
The building is probably around 100x100 ft - that's about 30x30 meters or 900 square meters. At 300W per square meter that's 270kW. That's a LOT of power. I doubt the entire Walmart uses more than 100kW.
The parking lot is probably 200-150ft or 2700 square meters. That gives another 800kW.
So all together if my Walmart was covered in solar panels it would put out a megawatt of power, putting it on the scale of a small power plant.
Learn to math.
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (3)
The diode junction in a solar cell is forward biased by the electrons that the photons excite, and the recombination current of those electrons returning back to their original places flows through the P-N junction. The diode junction has an associated voltage drop which shows up as the external voltage of the cell.
Light emitting diodes just so happen to have a greater forward voltage drop, which means that a solar cell built on such a junction would naturally have a higher voltage, and when you have a higher voltage you get the same power out at a lower current, which leads to less heating of the panel, less resistive losses etc. etc.
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (6)
If you actually built it, you'd note that the system doesn't output a megawatt on average, but roughly 100 kW. It would do a megawatt during the middle of the day, but otherwise not.
And that's the problem with solar panels. To get the average up, you need to produce roughly ten times peak power. How do you smooth it out?
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (3)
Put panels over every roof and parking lot. Create huge excess capacity. Link up the whole globe on one grid. Add some storage capacity into the system (batteries, or pump water uphill, whatever). Improve efficiency of household and industrial devices (where I'd guess at least half the energy could be saved if we were smarter). Radically reduce the weight of vehicles by putting electric rails in the roads, so electric vehicles would not need to carry heavy batteries, and redesigning the traffic system to eliminate the ability of idiots to crash into one another, so safety systems would not have to be directly proportional to vehicle weight. Standardize on one or two voltages to reduce conversion losses.
Last week I read that solar panels get fried if you leave them in the sun without a load. The panels described here sound like they would not break down in that case, they would just glow.
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (3)
The Inverter circuits are very inefficient as they exist today. Converting the DC to AC will waste a heck of a lot of power, I estimate 550 KWatts available in AC, best case scenario and some excellent cooling schemes, full day light in Arizona, Sahara desert etc, maybe mountain top, Andes.
word-
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (6)
Now, about that money thing... The true "green" economy is the "green" that folds and fits into a wallet. Like it or not, it IS what "makes the world go 'round". When it becomes financialy beneficial, Al Gore's marketing plan will be unnecessary.
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
On a Walmart scale installation, it might make more sense to simply use DC devices in the store. The cost of LED lighting is coming down fast and most other systems can be converted to DC.
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Why is their a theoretical efficiency or ceiling limit for solar cell efficiency?
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
So wherever 'inversion' or conversion must take place, that is power we do not get and since we cannot get solar power with the constancy of present fossil powered systems, the incentive to change is always argumentative and contentious. To send power over a distance, I need to raise voltage massively...send it, then step it down, convert it to DC locally @ the curb (1 to 40% loss!), or, send AC to the appliance and lose it there...humm..1 - 40% of the neighborhoods 250KW (AC/DC) or 10% of 10 watts (Mac Mini's and electronics, more for motors) 500 million times all day, a bit less at night. We need a paradigm shift - better electronics and motors??!
word-to-ya-mutha
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I don't know what shitty-ass town that axemaster lives in but in my shitty-ass town (in Canadia) the local walmart measures 330x400 feet and I don't think it is big by US standards so there you go. That's way more than a ten fold increase. Next challenge please! :)
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I agree that peak power vs actual created is very different and you could add where it is located in relation to the equator. But a thin film panel with 28% efficiency (beats silicon) is significant. If this has the same advantages as its thin film brothers it makes the silicon panel less desirable in all building applications. Longevity is an issue but given the material I would expect greater life (it is evident in LED light bulbs).
As to storage... Should their be excess power electric (battery based) cars could be depositories for excess using smart grid technology that already exists.
I agree that peak power vs actual created is very different and you could add where it is located in relation to the equator. But a thin film panel with 28% efficiency (beats silicon) is significant. If this has the same advantages as
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The light incident on the earths surface during the day is equal to a sine wave:
300W/m * 30m^2 * Sin[theta(2Pi/(60*60*24))]
Integrating over 12 hours gives: 172 kW average power during the day.
Now, I admit my Walmart is crappy and small. Doing the numbers for nixnixnix's Walmart (330-400ft) gives 1.15 MW average daytime power.
I am not putting these numbers up as absolute in any way, I am just doing estimations. It's easy to see that lots of power generation is possible, even if actual output were only 1/2 or less.
My parents have already installed solar panels in the roof of their business and saved a lot of money... We have discussed the lack of adoption quite a bit, and as far as we can tell, people simply aren't aware that it's actually financially practical to do.
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
If you tuned the external fluorescence frequency to the ideal wavelength of the solar cell and then redirected the fluorescence internally to another solar panel wafered behind the first, then 30% of the waste florescent energy could be collected by the second collector.
You could then increase the total output per meter/2 by another 10% approx.
Any waste fluorescence could then be radiated out the under side of the panel to further reduce heating.
Nov 07, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Nov 08, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
"If you actually built it, you'd note that the system doesn't output a megawatt on average, but roughly 100 kW" - Eikka
Well, a bit more than that. More like 160 KWh.
But then like most everything else, WalMart doesn't run all day so they don't need to generate much energy when the sun goes down.
So if we just consider the daytime production, the average wattage is 300 KWh.
And these low numbers presume the panels aren't steerable.
You might notice a trend in Modern Retail stores where there is a ridge line of windows along the southern wall near the roof.
They exist to reduce lighting costs by bringing sunlight into the store.
These windows will continue to get larger as energy costs rise.
Nov 08, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
Lets assume $4.00 a watt with installation.
It is estimated that George Bush's war crimes in Iraq will cost the American People 4 trillion dollars.
If this money had been invested in solar panels installed at $4.00 a watt, then the U.S. would have a generating capacity of 1 trillion watts Solar.
Even if these panels operated at only 1/10th of their rated capacity on average, this would represeent 876 Trillion TWh of electric power generation.
This is about 40 times the current generating capacity in the U.S.
Nov 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
We have a 'super walmart' in my town of 15K in Ohio, and the GIS map shows it at almost exactly 300'x600'. I would guess 8-10% of the surface is covered with skylights and HVAC mechanicals (it's only a few years old). As a side note, the roof is probably 20' high and collects over a million pounds of water for every inch of rain. That's 20 million foot pounds of energy, or an astonishing 7.5 kilowatt hours (lol).
Nov 08, 2011
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (5)
Multi-layer cells are getting 42 percent in the lab.
Nov 08, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 09, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Assuming that the panels have 100% fill and no frames, and no shade or dirt on them, and you don't use blocking diodes on the arrays because they're perfectly balanced.
There's practical problems with arrays of solar panels, especially when you connect cells in series to get a useful voltage out because if you shade one cell, it will effectively limit the output of the whole series and heat up considerably in the process, so a bit of dirt or a single leaf on a panel that blocks one cell in the series will have a surprisingly large effect on the whole.
That's also a reason why a higher voltage out of a single cell is nice, because then you don't have to put so many in series. Still, you need the blocking diodes to stop parallel unbalanced cells from discharging into one another.
Nov 09, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
And the blocking diodes sap some of the output voltage, reducing the total efficiency. For example, for a 12 volt panel you'd get a 6-7% reduction in efficiency in exchange for the ability to wire many panels in parallel. The diodes are somewhat expensive though, because they have to handle large currents, so you might want to increase voltage in series instead of putting more cells in parallel.
The series panel issue can also be solved with bypass diodes, which shunt the current around the weak cells, but again because the diodes aren't exactly cheap you can't have a diode per cell. More like one for every five.
Besides, wiring more cells in series diminishes maximum output anyways by increasing series resistance of the interconnecting wires and thus lowering efficiency, so the array design is always more or less a compromize.
Nov 10, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Completely irrelevant because surface area is free, unless you are designing a satellite.
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
is your roommates sister a camwhore?
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Really? When will that be? 30 years from now? It just ain't happening yet. How close are we?
Nov 17, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
But limited in the case we were discussing.
In the general sense, the more surface are you use the higher the installation, maintenance, and cleaning costs, so it's kinda not free.