'Queen's English' not the best

Nov 02, 2011

Native English speakers should give up their claim to be the guardians of the purest form of the language and accept that the ways it is used and changed by millions around the world are equally valid.

A linguist at the University of Portsmouth, Dr. Mario Saraceni, has published an article in the latest issue of the journal Changing English which suggests the way English is taught to non-native speakers and the of those for whom it is their need a dramatic change.

He said: “It’s important the psychological umbilical cord linking English to its arbitrary centre in England is cut. The English are not the only legitimate owners of the .

“English is the most dominant language on the planet and though it is spoken widely in the western world, westerners are in the minority of English language speakers.

“For many around the world, the ability to speak English has become as important as knowing how to use a computer. But the myth of the idealized native speaker needs to be abandoned. How it is spoken by others should not be seen as second best.”

Dr. Saraceni, of the School of Languages and Area Studies, said it was time English language teachers abroad took down posters of double-decker buses and Parliament Square from their classrooms and taught English in a purely local context.

He said: “Critics might feel uncomfortable with what they see as a laissez-faire attitude but language use is not about getting closer to the ‘home’ of English, and it is not about bowing deferentially and self-consciously to the so-called superiority of the inner circle of the UK, US, Australia and New Zealand.

“Language use is fundamentally about mutual understanding.”

According to Dr Saraceni, the widely held view that English has spread around the world from its original birthplace in England can be challenged.

“The idea seems natural and unquestionable, but if you examine it closer it is patently untrue. It is impossible to identify any point in history or geography where the English language started – one can talk only of phases of development. The origins of English are not to be found in the idea of it spreading from the centre to the periphery, but in multiple, simultaneous origins. The concept of a single version of any language is always questionable.”

English has been “reincarnated” throughout the world, including in Malaysia, India, China and Nigeria but England should not be seen as the linguistic “garden of Eden” where the language was pure and perfect, he said, though this notion has “not yet been accepted by linguistic vigilantes or the power elite” despite being favoured by many linguists globally.

The de-Anglicisation of English needs to take place primarily in classrooms and the “whole mystique of the native speaker and mother tongue should be quietly dropped from the ’s set of myths about the language”.

Dr. Saraceni said: “Fundamentally, we need to re-think the whole concept of languages in connection to nations and we need to begin to accept that people use the linguistic repertoires that suit them the most. The notion of separate of language ‘A’, language ‘B’, etc. needs to be reconsidered in favor of a more flexible approach.” Dr. Saraceni’s thought piece is published in the latest issue of Changing English.

Explore further: World population likely to peak by 2070

Provided by University of Portsmouth

3.2 /5 (5 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Bilinguals get the blues

Mar 15, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Learning a foreign language literally changes the way we see the world, according to new research.

For English learners, reading isn't always

Apr 11, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- An influential model for teaching reading and comprehension to English learners doesn’t work well for Cantonese-speaking children, according to new research from the University of California, Davis, ...

Looking beyond English

May 05, 2011

In fall 2008, Daniel Ginsberg, an English as a Second Language teacher at a public high school in Malden, Mass., approached MIT professor Wayne O’Neil asking about incorporating linguistics into his curriculum ...

Recommended for you

World population likely to peak by 2070

5 hours ago

World population will likely peak at around 9.4 billion around 2070 and then decline to around 9 billion by 2100, according to new population projections from IIASA researchers, published in a new book, World Population and ...

Bullying in schools is still prevalent, national report says

6 hours ago

Despite a dramatic increase in public awareness and anti-bullying legislation nationwide, the prevalence of bullying is still one of the most pressing issues facing our nation's youth, according to a report by researchers ...

Study examines effects of credentialing, personalization

9 hours ago

Chris Gamrat, a doctoral student in learning, design and technology, recently had his study—completed alongside Heather Zimmerman, associate professor of education; Jaclyn Dudek, a doctoral student studying learning, design ...

Data indicate there is no immigration crisis

Oct 22, 2014

Is there an "immigration crisis" on the U.S.-Mexico border? Not according to an examination of historical immigration data, according to a new paper from Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Nov 02, 2011
English = England. Period. All other versions are just that, local versions.

As proven by the sentence "English is the most dominant language on the planet and though it is spoken widely in the western world, westerners are in the minority of English language speakers." this is nothing but anti-western xenophobia and racism at work
not rated yet Nov 03, 2011
English is not a static language, it gains from all over the world, but however you struggle against the obvious, it still originated in England.
not rated yet Nov 03, 2011
English = England.

Which part? Even in England the accents and dialects vary greatly. London? Even there you have dialects which are so different that one part of London will not understand what another part is saying (e.g. Cockney).

I think we have a 'No true Scotsman' case, here.

That said I have a problem with this part
said it was time English language teachers abroad took down posters of double-decker buses and Parliament Square from their classrooms and taught English in a purely local context.

The notion of trying to teach 'British English' has its merits in that it keeps the language from fracturing (even more). If everyone were to start off bing taught the local bastardization we soon would have many dialects which only locals can understand. As it is now it is still possible for someone from India to understand someone from the UK and vice versa. That would disappear fast if one were to relinquish the common root.