Quantum error correction in solid state processing

Nov 16, 2011 by Miranda Marquit feature

(PhysOrg.com) -- "Liquid state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) has been successful for quantum information processing,” Osama Moussa tells PhysOrg.com. “However, there are some questions about scalability and other issues. There are thoughts that maybe solid state NMR could overcome some of these problems."

In order for solid state quantum to work, though, the ability to perform would be required. Moussa, a scientist at Waterloo University in Ontario, Canada, worked with Jonathan Baugh, Colm A. Ryan and Raymond Laflamme to test a method of quantum error correction in a solid state information processing system. The results of their work can be found in : “Demonstration of Sufficient Control for Two Rounds of Quantum Error Correction in a Solid State Ensemble Quantum Information Processor.”

“People have looked at some ideas for controlling liquid state in quantum information processing, and proposed similar ways to control a solid state system,” Moussa says. “We took the idea of emulating a processor by having an ensemble of molecules. Each has a string of nuclei acting as qubits.”

Moussa explains that, unlike a liquid state system, there isn’t the same amount of motion in a solid state system. “With a solid state system, you don’t have motion so you can put molecules farther away from each other, and have a buffer,” he says.

The team at Waterloo University used a single crystal malonic acid for their system. “Molecules with three carbon-13 nuclei provide the magnetic states that you can control,” Moussa says. “We call them the processors. We also include buffers of the same compound, but with carbon-12 instead of carbon-13. That way there is no interaction between the processors.”

“It’s similar to a liquid state ,” Moussa continues, “but it works better for quantum processing. It has bigger couplings, and hence faster times for gates. Additionally, the solid state system has potential for higher polarization, and offers longer coherence times, which is important in quantum information processing.”

After preparing the solid state system, Moussa and his colleagues next needed to test the ability to perform error correction. Specifically, the group wanted to be able to accomplish two rounds of error correction. “The problem is that you need more definite states,” he says. “We have shown that, in principle, our system can reach highly definite states, but for the time being our system can’t reach very high definite states.”

One round of quantum error correction was possible, but the Waterloo team wanted to be able to do another round. “Instead, we came up with a way to measure as if we were doing it twice – but without having a definite state on the second round – and we showed that we have good enough control to perform two rounds,” Moussa explains. “This result offers evidence that this is a viable system in which you can implement quantum information processing with encoded states that are protected from natural noise.”

There is potential for hybrid systems, thanks to this result. “We’ve shown that there is the control possible to perform error correction in solid state systems where the information is encoded on nuclear spins,” Moussa points out. “One could envisage a variety of hybrid systems with nuclear spins as the primary information carrier. As we get better at manipulating the states, and as we develop protocols for systems like these, as a field will benefit.”

Explore further: Tiny magnetic sensor deemed attractive

More information: Osama Moussa, Jonathan Baugh, Colm A. Ryan, and Raymond Laflamme, “Demonstration of Sufficient Control for Two Rounds of Quantum Error Correction in a Solid State Ensemble Quantum Information Processor,” Physical Review Letters (2011). Available online: link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.160501

Journal reference: Physical Review Letters search and more info website

4.4 /5 (8 votes)

Related Stories

Large scale qubit generation for quantum computing

Jul 27, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- "Many people are trying to build a quantum computer," Olivier Pfister tells PhysOrg.com. "One to the problems, though, is that you need hundreds of thousands of qubits. So far, scalability has been someth ...

Reducing noise in quantum operation at room temperature

Aug 23, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- "A quantum memory is a crucial component of future quantum information processing technologies. Among these technologies, a quantum communications system based on light will enable vastly improved performance ...

Scientists view a quantum jump in real time

Apr 11, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- For more than two decades, scientists have been "watching" electrons in atoms make the jump between energy levels in real time. "Atoms have energy levels, and when electrons 'jump' from one level to another, ...

Could silicon be ideal in quantum computing?

Sep 16, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- "Quantum computing could provide a way to significantly speed up the way we process certain algorithms," Malcolm Carroll tells PhysOrg.com. "The primary issue, though, is that you need a well controlled two-le ...

Recommended for you

Tiny magnetic sensor deemed attractive

21 hours ago

Ultra-sensitive magnetic sensor technology pioneered at PML may soon be commercialized for a host of applications from detection of unexploded bombs and underground pipes to geophysical surveying and perhaps ...

Beams come knocking on the LHC's door

22 hours ago

Over the weekend, proton beams came knocking on the Large Hadron Collider's (LHC) door. Shooting from the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) and into the two LHC injection lines, the proton beams were stopped ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ED__269_
not rated yet Nov 16, 2011
The field seems to be progressing quickly.
Alexander_Wykel
not rated yet Nov 23, 2011
The thought that any quantum computer has a solid or motion stable state is off. This is an atomic or molecular state change, if the system was stimulated into emission of and liner dot operations of input that would be quantum anlouge computing, and states could have 'Q' flavor described by output vecotor assignments which are entangled and decoupled, Error is removed by adding a parity tone to a vector. It would be nice to have a realy unstable Parity where any change in vector due to error is written to parity.

Not much diffrent then how it's done now. Only no logical 1 and 0. More like Min. Max. [Operating Range]

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.