Poland plans its first atomic power plant on Baltic

November 25, 2011

Poland currently relies on its plentiful coal reserves to generate 94 percent of its electricity

Enlarge

View of the Belchatow power plant in Belchatow, near Lodz central Poland. Poland's first nuclear power plant, due to come on line by 2020, is set to be located near the Baltic Sea, Polish energy group PGE said.

Poland's first nuclear power plant, due to come on line by 2020, is set to be located near the Baltic Sea, Polish energy group PGE said on Friday.

Three potential sites near the coast, at Zarnowiec, Choczewo and Gaski, were picked from around a hundred proposed locations, PGE chief Tomasz Zadroga told reporters.

The final choice is due to be announced in around two years, when the winner of the bidding race to build the plant will also be revealed, he said.

State-controlled PGE, which is in charge of Poland's programme, is set to launch the tender process before the end of this year.

Poland, a nation of 38 million people, currently relies on its plentiful to generate 94 percent of its electricity.

The ex-communist country, which joined the European Union in 2004, aims to construct two 3,000-megawatt reactors.

The cost of the nuclear programme is estimated at 100 billion zloty (22.1 billion euros, $29.4 billion)

Three international consortia have already expressed an interest in the project: France's EDF and Areva, US-Japanese Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, and US-Japanese GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas.

The nuclear option is strategic for Poland.

One goal is to meet EU quotas for cutting the country's , a tough task in a coal-fired economy.

The government's energy policy also involves reducing the role of energy imports.

Poland currently relies on Russia to cover 40 percent of its gas needs, for example, while other importers supply 30 percent and its own resources account for 30 percent.

(c) 2011 AFP

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

epsi00
Nov 25, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Oops. The efforts of Germany and Danemark to go nuclear free is now useless, nuclear radiation does not care about artificial borders in case of accidents.
rawa1
Nov 25, 2011

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
The government's energy policy also involves reducing the role of energy imports
The Poland is already a largest exporter of energy and polluters of life environment in Europe. The Poland is building these plants just for money and it plays a role European China in many aspects, not just with respect to its economical emigration.

http://disc.sci.g...obal.jpg
ShotmanMaslo
Nov 25, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Poland, a nation of 38 million people, currently relies on its plentiful coal reserves to generate 94 percent of its electricity.


Nice to see Poland trying to lower its carbon footprint, it was about time.
rawa1
Nov 25, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
At the case of Fukushima-type disaster the things would become quite interesting, because the Baltic sea is relatively shallow and closed.
antialias_physorg
Nov 25, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Oops. The efforts of Germany and Danemark to go nuclear free is now useless, nuclear radiation does not care about artificial borders in case of accidents.

How is it useless? Turn off 20 old power plants - build one new one. Not as good as a 20 to zero ratio but still WAY better than nothing.

Given the area of radiation fallout and major contamination after an accident it is still preferrable to have that happen in Poland (on the far side of Poland to boot) than right in the middle of your own country.
Skepticus
Nov 25, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Asian and second or third grade countries are building nuclear power stations, gaming their chances on the advancements make in technology. On the other hand, first world countries are turning their backs on nuclear while still fiddling with smal-scale renewables. Great news for the oil and coal power stations there!
Dane
Nov 25, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
...The efforts of Germany and Danemark to go nuclear free is now useless,...


Denmark does not have and has never had nuclear power stations.
The danish people are even more nuclear-frightened than the Germans. There's no debate in the political circles, and only one small center-right party actually endorses nuclear power.
The last open debate took place some 40 year ago.

Instead we're so stupid that we bet our money on the most expensive sources like windmills and biomass.

About ~15% of our electricity comes from windmills - that means the amount produced, not the amount actually used. Because of the unpredictable nature of wind-power, most is either sold way below market price or simply given away for free! When it is used we pay at least 20c per kWh, rising with every new park constructed (off shore).
Biomass is <10%, but only because we do heavy and pricy imports (e.g. Russia)!

The rest of our power comes from mainly coal and natural gas.
What a joke!
dschlink
Nov 25, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
These countries won't be "nuclear-free" until they stop importing power generated by nukes. Europe is too small for NIMBY to be meaningful.
kochevnik
Nov 27, 2011

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Nice to see Poland trying to lower its carbon footprint, it was about time.
That's what Iran is trying to do as well, but Israel and the US/English oil interests won't have it.
Skepticus
Nov 29, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Nice to see...but Israel and the US/English oil interests won't have it.


Please take a course of politics 101 for the 21st century, will you? Basically, you will try to crowbar, hinder and apply wholesale effort to demonize your enemy's advancements (or wish to) in whatsoever fields, by whatsoever means. Choice methods are your owned press and political pressure, assassinations of key personnel, blowing up installations (you get away every time if none can prove it conclusively, your owned press can always whitewash, censor muddle or deny the whole thing ever happened.) Never mind whether their endeavors are lawful or not, they ARE the enemy! Laws (can always be rewritten) be damned! And if you repeat your allegations 1000 times, 100,000 times, some dills will believe it and vote you in office, authorize bombing the upstart shit back to the Stone Age. Then, all will be well! From whatever hole you have been living in, welcome to the 21st century's alpha monkey polictics!
Rank 5 /5 (7 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Technology / Software

created 14 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 3

Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study

Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 3.6 / 5 (25) | comments 56 | with audio podcast

HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world

(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the company’s ultimate vision, successfully producing ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (16) | comments 17 | with audio podcast report

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Technology / Hi Tech & Innovation

created May 26, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 13 | with audio podcast report

Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22

Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (12) | comments 18


Stunning image of smallest possible five-ringed structure

Scientists have created and imaged the smallest possible five-ringed structure – about 100,000 times thinner than a human hair – and you'll probably recognise its shape.

'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study

(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.