Nebraska welcomes new pipeline route

Nov 16, 2011
An oil extraction facility near the town of Fort McMurray in Alberta Province, Canada. Nebraska's governor on Tuesday welcomed a controversial US-Canada pipeline now that it will be rerouted away from the state's sensitive wetlands, but environmentalists vowed to keep up the fight.

Nebraska's governor on Tuesday welcomed a controversial US-Canada pipeline now that it will be rerouted away from the state's sensitive wetlands, but environmentalists vowed to keep up the fight.

Governor Dave Heinenman said he hoped the Keystone XL pipeline project could move forward as quickly as possible and disagrees with "environmental leftists groups that oppose the pipeline no matter what."

"I supported the pipeline -- I opposed the route," Heinenman told reporters. "Now the route's going to change, we can go forward with the pipeline."

Pipeline operator TransCanada Corp on Monday agreed to reroute the pipeline after Nebraska lawmakers introduced legislation aimed at protecting the state's Sand Hills area, which features important wetlands and a sensitive ecosystem.

The move came shortly after President Barack Obama's administration delayed the project, saying it needed more time to assess the pipeline's environmental implications and warning that a final decision may not come until 2013.

The State Department said last week its move was based on specific concerns about the Sand Hills area, which is along the proposed pipeline route from Canada's Alberta province to refineries in Texas.

The decision to change the route will not change the department's "thorough, rigorous and transparent review process," spokesman Mark Toner said Monday.

Activists fear an accident along the 1,700-mile (2,700-kilometer) pipeline would be disastrous for aquifers in central US Great Plains states.

Others oppose the $13 billion project because exploiting the requires energy that generates a large volume of .

The National Resource Defense Council applauded Nebraska's victory in protecting the Sand Hills, and vowed to continue to oppose the project in order to protect the climate.

"Now we need TransCanada to listen to the American people tell them 'no' to the pipeline as a whole," Susan Casey-Lefkowitz, international program director, wrote in a blog post.

"What Nebraska will see is that there is no safe route for a leaky tar sands pipeline through any of their farms and communities. And what the nation knows is that we can't fight climate change and build yet another tar sands oil ."

The environmental group Bold Nebraska also vowed to carry on the fight.

"We do not trust TransCanada. They have bullied and mislead landowners and citizens," founder Jane Kleeb said in a statement. "Because of that we will be watching them like a hawk to ensure our land and water are protected."

Explore further: Minorities aren't well represented in environmental groups, study says

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US to study alternate route for US-Canada pipeline

Nov 10, 2011

The US government said Thursday it would study an alternate route for a controversial US-Canada oil pipeline, and pushed back its final decision on the project until 2013 -- after next year's presidential ...

Impact statement on US oil pipeline due in August

Jul 23, 2011

The US State Department said Friday it expects by mid-August to release a final environmental impact statement on a proposed $13 billion oil pipeline that would stretch from Canada to Texas.

US sees no major harm from Keystone XL pipeline

Aug 26, 2011

The proposed Keystone XL pipeline that would bring oil from Canada's tar sands to the US Gulf Coast would have "no significant impact" on the environment, the United States said Friday.

Activists push for end to US-Canada pipeline plan

Nov 07, 2011

Thousands of protesters rallied outside the White House on Sunday to press US President Barack Obama to scrap plans for a multi-billion-dollar oil pipeline stretching from Canada to Texas.

Proposed pipeline could cost jobs, not create them

Oct 03, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Claims of job creation by the TransCanada Corp. Keystone XL Pipeline are inflated at best and misleading at worst, according to a new report by the ILR Global Labor Institute (GLI) posted on its website.

Recommended for you

Malaysia air quality 'unhealthy' as haze obscures skies

1 hour ago

Air quality around Malaysia's capital Kuala Lumpur and on Borneo island was "unhealthy" on Tuesday, with one town reaching "very unhealthy" levels as haze—mostly from forest fires in Indonesia—obscured skies.

Worldwide water shortage by 2040

1 hour ago

Two new reports that focus on the global electricity water nexus have just been published. Three years of research show that by the year 2040 there will not be enough water in the world to quench the thirst of the world population ...

Regulations only a first step in cutting emissions

2 hours ago

Intensifying calls for action on climate change have led to a variety of proposed regulations to cut greenhouse gas emissions from specific sources of the economy, including, most recently, the environmental ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

RCB
2.3 / 5 (3) Nov 16, 2011
"What Nebraska will see is that there is no safe route for a leaky tar sands pipeline through any of their farms and communities. And what the nation knows is that we can't fight climate change and build yet another tar sands oil pipeline."

Give me a break from this ultra extreme environmentalist prattle. Here's some news for these whiners: We are already using tar sand oil daily in the US and several pipelines carrying oil and oil products already cross the Ogallala Aquifer.

Pipelines are essential to the energy needs of the US, energy companies can and do operate them safely and efficiently. Risk can be minimized but not eliminated; tryiing to cancel pipelines because any risk is present is beyond moronic.

"Fighting climate change" is a cult/psychosis that continues to permeate all enviro groups. Here's a message to all groups: You will NEVER attain the god like control over the environment and individual Americans you are desperately seeking.