NASA develops new game-changing technology
November 18, 2011 By Priscilla Vega
This picture shows three High Operating Temperature Infrared Sensors, mounted on leadless chip carriers. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
Two NASA California centers have been selected to develop new space-aged technologies that could be game-changers in the way we look at planets from above and how we safely transport robots or humans through space and bring them safely back to Earth.
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., will use advanced compound semiconductor materials to develop new technologies for the High Operating Temperature Infrared Sensor Demonstration. The higher the temperature at which an infrared detector can operate, the less power is required to cool it. Reduced power needs can translate into operational cost and system weight savings. If successful, this sensor technology could be used in many future NASA Earth and planetary science instruments, as well as for U.S. commercial and defense applications.
"The technology demonstration effort is different in the fact that we're focused on affordability concurrently with performance," said Sarath Gunapala of JPL, who is project manager for the High Operating Temperature Infrared Sensor Demonstration. "This technology has excellent potential for transitioning from laboratory demonstration to NASA and commercial product lines."
The overall goal for this technology development effort is to achieve 100 percent cost savings as compared with traditional cryogenically cooled infrared sensors. The weight and volume savings allow for more compact instruments -- an important consideration for a spacecraft's payload size and cost. This state-of-the-art technology also will have spinoff applications for commercial instrument manufacturers.
Seeking to radically change the way heat shields protect spacecraft during atmospheric entry, NASA's Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, Calif., is developing the Woven Thermal Protection System. The project is a revolutionary approach to thermal protection system design and manufacturing for extreme environments. Ames is the lead center for the project, partnering with NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va.
Partnering with the U.S. textile industry, NASA is employing an advanced, three-dimensional weaving approach in the design and manufacture of thermal protection systems. Today, lightweight aircraft parts are being manufactured using similar weaving technologies. This will be expanded to include spacecraft heatshield applications. The system will enhance performance using advanced design tools with cost savings from a shortened product development and testing cycle.
"Woven TPS has the potential to significantly impact future NASA missions by changing heat shield development from a challenge to be overcome into a mission-enabling component," said NASA Langley's Ethiraj Venkatapathy, principal investigator of the project. "By delivering improved heat shield performance and affordability, this technology will impact all future exploration missions, from the robotic science missions to Mars, Venus and Saturn to the next generation of human missions."
NASA's Game-Changing Technology Division focuses on maturing advanced space technologies that may lead to entirely new approaches for the agency's future space missions while finding solutions to significant national needs. NASA Langley oversees project management of the Game Changing Technology programs.
Provided by
JPL/NASA
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Distance of planets from stars and revolution
5 hours ago
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
2 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
2
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
4 hours ago |
4 / 5 (1) |
11
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
4 hours ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (14) |
40
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (10)
What a shame the Republicans have long had NASA's destruction as one of their treasonous goals.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (9)
When you have the private sector(SpaceX) sending cargo into space a $1000 per pound vs. the NASA space shuttle's $10,000-$15,000 per pound, then you tell me which is the bigger crime!? Government is inherently inefficient(E.G. USPS and DMV) and is no where near as incentivised and motivated to produce better end results as the private sector at anything.
http://www.calwat...ace-age/
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
In point of fact, both sides of the aisle, along with multiple Administrations, have had a hand in playing politics with NASA. Fiddling with its mission statement, budget, priorities, etc.
In any case, it's good to see valuable work being done at NASA. Most Americans have a very favorable view of it and look to it as a leader in science and technology.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
I agree. NASA does certain things well, like basic research, and it should be free to stick to its core strengths while allowing some of these areas like LEO hauling to be opened up completely to whomever does it best.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
God you guys are idiots. Typical politics. You both managed to be on different sides, and you both managed to be wrong as well.
1. Republicans tend to support NASA, believe it or not.
2. Obama pushed to have NASA to work with private companies like SpaceX etc to a much greater extent. The republicans protested - They wanted to keep NASA as it was - A govt dominated enterprise.
Obviously this situation is backwards from the typical, but just goes to show that partisans aren't to be bothered with facts.
Also, CP, If the Post Office was allowed to charge cost - it would be 50c a letter (VS $7 for a competitor) they are efficient - they just need to be able to adjust their prices appropriately, among other things.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
This is great -- now that NASA doesn't have to allocate as many resources to its space-taxis, it can focus on its core business which is going where no one has gone before!
I just attended a talk from a NASA senior researcher and he seemed really passionate about this direction. It seems that they're starting to realize the implications, that they can start thinking big again.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I sometimes see comments about privatization being "forced". While this may or may not be the case, it's irrelevant. Because, now that the science is achievable for individual organizations (a select few, to be sure), there are plenty of people who want to explore space, on their own terms, without government involvement or interference.
Frankly, that's a good thing for everybody. Why should a cutting-edge group like NASA be focused on cranking repetitively cranking out communication satellites or other very mundane tasks? Let SpaceX have their fun. And let NASA stay focused.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
They want the new sensors to cost nothing at all?
(Well, at least their cost reduction projections didn't EXCEED 100%...)
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (3)
If SpaceX fails , then NASA can focus on its core business - which is going NOWHERE.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
As for SpaceX all the best. But cost per kilogram is a different metric that cost per astronaut safely returned. To date I have a record as good as SpaceX: zero.
Sure, for militarization purposes. Can't have those secrets falling into private hands.
Nov 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
"The overall goal for this technology development effort is to achieve 100 percent cost savings as compared with traditional cryogenically cooled infrared sensors."
So, if the traditional cryogenically cooled infrared cost $1,000 each, NASA's goal is to bring the new ones in at $500.
Nov 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
True. But, look at that glass as half-full. SpaceX has lost 18 fewer astronauts than NASA and the Russians!
Nov 20, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Nov 21, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Perhaps the difference is too subtle for JPL/NASA publicists, but it could be the difference between an A and an F in fourth-grade math...
;)