Want fuel cells? Think outside the hydrogen tank
November 18, 2011 By Kyle Todd
One of Professor Eric Wachsman's solid-oxide fuel cells (SOFCs)
(PhysOrg.com) -- When most people hear the words "fuel cell," they think of eco-friendly, hydrogen-powered cars that emit nothing more than water.
And that, says Professor Eric Wachsman, director of the University of Maryland Energy Research Center (UMERC), is one of the reasons we're all not driving one.
The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) recent decisions about how to fund fuel cell research, he says, are putting the country at risk of falling behind in the development and implementation of the most efficient means of converting fuel to electricity. Fuel cells have up to three times the efficiency of an internal combustion engine.
"There is a problem in the perception of the public and policy makers, and in the funding of our fuel cell programs, that hydrogen and fuel cells are linked," says Wachsman, a faculty member at the university's A. James Clark School of Engineering. "Hydrogen-based fuel cells are the technology that has gotten all of the press and as a result we're still waiting for a future hydrogen infrastructure. Yes, fuel cells can run off hydrogen, but they don't have to."
Another problem, Wachsman says, is America's fixation on vehicles. "It will take decades to create a nationwide hydrogen distribution and storage system, and to convert every gas station into a hydrogen filling station. That reality has turned fuel cells into a 'future technology' and has resulted in a drastic reduction in the funding of fuel cell research by the DOE in favor of developing electric cars, when in fact fuel cells can be used right now in many stationary and mobile applications, including centralized power distribution and power generation for homes, businesses, and industry."
Most people are unaware that there are two kinds of fuel cells. The one in the public eye, the proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell, uses hydrogen to generate power. The type of fuel cell Wachsman and his colleagues have worked to perfect, the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC), has a distinct advantage over its PEM-based sibling.
"Solid oxide fuel cells are unique because they can oxidize any fuel," Wachsman explains. "They can run off of gasoline, diesel and natural gas today, and biofuels and hydrogen in the future, whenever that infrastructure is in place."
Hot Technology
Still, nothing's perfect, and Wachsman can sum up the reason why SOFCs aren't in large-scale production in a word: temperature.
"That is the issue," he explains. "It's the reason why the automotive companies are using PEM fuel cells. PEM fuel cells operate at around 80 degrees Celsius [180 degrees Fahrenheit], which allows them to startup fairly quickly. Current solid oxide fuel cells currently operate at 800 degrees Celsius [1500 degrees Fahrenheit], so it takes a long time to warm up to operating temperature, making them more applicable to stationary power generation."
Wachsman and his colleagues are working to change that. In an article in the November 18 issue of Science, the team outlines the technology behind a new world record power density SOFC that generates two watts of power per square centimeter at 650 degrees Celsius [1200 degrees Fahrenheit]. The cell uses a bi-layer electrolyte developed by Wachsman that is more than 100 times more conductive than the conventional zirconia-based electrolyte operating at the same temperature also a world record. When the cells are assembled into a stack they should produce three kilowatts of electricity per kilogram of material, more than an internal combustion engine at approximately one-third the size.
The paper lays out a strategy to further lower temperature. The team believes its improvements to SOFC electrolytes and nanostructured-electrode designs could ultimately reduce the cells' operating temperature to only 350 degrees Celsius [660 degrees Fahrenheit]. At that temperature they could start up fast enough for automotive applications, and would be more efficient and more affordable than current SOFCs because they could be manufactured from less expensive materials.
More information: See Eric D. Wachsman and Kang Taek Lee. "Lowering the Temperature of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells." Science, 2011, forthcoming.
See Eric D. Wachsman, Craig A. Marlowe and Kang Taek Lee. "Role of solid oxide fuel cells in a balanced energy strategy." Energy and Environmental Science, 2011. Read the advance article online here.
Provided by
University of Maryland
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
Low temperature fuel cells: New clean, energy efficient technology to power cars and mobiles
-
Need a rigid insulation material???
17 hours ago
-
magnets or EMF in car bumpers to protect from fender bender
May 26, 2012
-
length of wire in a coil of known dimensions?
May 25, 2012
-
India Engineering Powerhouse
May 25, 2012
-
electromagnet core dereference between hard and soft iron
May 25, 2012
-
Measuring water pressure in an open tank
May 24, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Engineering
More news stories
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
9 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
3
Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study
Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
3.6 / 5 (22) |
56
|
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22
Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (12) |
18
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
Almost half of new vets seek disability
(AP) -- America's newest veterans are filing for disability benefits at a historic rate, claiming to be the most medically and mentally troubled generation of former troops the nation has ever seen.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (3)
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (8)
But if the SOFC can just reach temperature as you reach your destination, what's the point? The longer it takes to start up, the more energy you waste.
Heating up a kilogram of iron for example by 650 degrees takes 300 kJ of energy. Now, if your "engine" weighs 25 kilograms for 100 HP on the pedal, and you need all that warmed up before you go, that's 2 kWh or 1/4 a liter of gasoline wasted right there. With that amount of fuel, you would already be 2 miles down the road, or 5-6 miles if we assume that the fuel cell has three times the fuel economy.
So it's quickly apparent that the efficiency of the car suffers a lot on short trips. Could work for a taxi, because it doesn't have time to cool down.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (3)
The trouble is that it would take 10-15 minutes at a reasonable rate so that the battery doesn't boil over, and the battery would be empty after just one start.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
If the charge gets low then the fuel cell just turns on and charges up the battery.
If you are going to go on vacation or put it in storage or it is being garaged where the CO2 buildup could be a problem then there is a switch to shut it down. You simply use an outlet to get it hot again in say 20 minutes.
A simple CO2 external air sensor could recognize when CO2 buildup is becoming a risk and shut down automatically to avoid danger if someone forgot to turn it off and it has been left for a few hundred hours.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
http://www.fossil...ide.html
http://en.wikiped...n_engine
an aside - as it turns out, rocket engines are about 70% efficient if the expansion chamber is big enough.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (6)
Power up the car with the SOFC, when parked plug it into the house to provide power, sell back excess to the power company. If the entire country were to do this, we'd likely find our big power generation facilities worthless.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
For short journeys the battery would be used only and depending on the total distance needed to travel, the car would start the warm-up process to recharge the batteries while you do your food shopping for example.
With enough programming and great insulation around the fuel cell, I'd be surprised if this type of technology would actually inhibit your everyday life.
Sure it might slow you down in some situations but there is a simple way to deal with that, suck it up and stop complaining!
In time things will be more convenient and efficient than they are now but we can't keep denying all these technologies on the premise that they are not 100% as "great" as what we have today.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
bullhocky. Those foolcells are no where near 50% eff nor are they are eff as ICE's can be. They don't include the pumps, etc in either the weight or input energy.
Facts are good ICE's running 90% power in large sizes now are 50% eff and about 35% for car motors though only running near full power.
If you want an eff car, then a 50-100 mile battery range and a very small generator of 5kw/1,000lbs of car will give by far the best eff and fuel options.
What we really need is a 2hp Rankine heat engine so we can turn heating oil, wood, used veg oil, etc into heat and electricity during heating season.
If I was up north, in Fl so not worth it here, I'd by a water cooled 5-10hp diesel and run it on used veg oil, kerosene, biogas or whatever free/low cost fuel at 1200rpm for long life to replace the furnance.
And they have short lives.
Nov 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Nov 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
But it would still halve your fuel economy, because you're only going to drive 10 miles to work. It would make it barely any better than regular hybrids.
Nov 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
But yes, as Fuel Cell Energy has been showing for years now, you can make electricity with fuel cells from many energy sources such as natural gas...even wastewater!
Nov 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Asinine. You'd burn expensive, portable fuels in order to feed power into a grid that mostly uses cheap fuels. There's no future in fossil fuels and generating hydrogen takes an awful lot of energy which will come from ... big power generation facilities.
Nov 21, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Which is why nobody will buy it unless they absolutely must. It's an inconvenience that nobody wants. It's the reason why steam cars didn't win over internal combustion - the latter would turn on and be ready at the turn of a key.
Nov 24, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Under such a circumstances I'd definitely rather invest into research of nuclear sources, than into ineffective and bulky chemical energy sources - no matter which "green" technology they're actually using. BTW Andrea Rossi claims that a $24 million order has been sent to buy his cold-fusion device.
http://evworld.co...yid=2035
Jan 16, 2012
Rank: not rated yet
The other option if using a power source is an option, radial heaters could be used. Which have limited heat loss and don't require any time at all to reach target temp.