EU adopts guidelines on airport body scanners

Nov 14, 2011 By SLOBODAN LEKIC , AP Aviation Writer

(AP) -- The European Union adopted new guidelines Monday on using body scanners at airports, hoping to address the privacy concerns that have delayed their implementation across the continent.

Siim Kallas, the EU commissioner responsible for transport, said under the rules the technology will only be used with strict to protect health and .

"Security scanners are not a panacea but they do offer a real possibility to reinforce passenger security," he said.

The scanners, some of which produce nude-like images of passengers, are already used in the United States and elsewhere as a more effective screening of passengers than .

Scanner technology is developing rapidly and has the potential to significantly reduce invasive pat-downs. The latest machines are equipped with software that displays a generic outline of a human body, with a red box around the area where a passenger may be concealing an object.

EU member states and airports do not have an obligation to deploy security scanners, but if they decide to use them, they will have to comply with the EU-wide operational standards.

Under the new EU law, security scanners must not store or copy any of the images, and the security staff analyzing the images will be in a room separate from where the actual screening is conducted. In addition, passengers must be informed and be given the right to choose an alternative method of screening.

And in order not to risk citizens' health and safety, only security scanners that do not use X-ray technology can be used at EU airports.

"The most important provision is that every passenger has the right to opt out and ask for the use of an alternative method," said Helen Kearns, spokeswoman for the transport commission.

EU states have been mulling the use of security scanners ever since Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a 24-year-old Nigerian, attempted in 2009 to blow up a plane flying from Amsterdam to Detroit with plastic explosives he had hidden in his underwear.

Until now, security scanners were used in a limited way under a patchwork of different national operational procedures. The scanners have tested in France, Italy, Finland and other countries, and been used at airports in Britain and the Netherlands.

But the whole body imaging machines have sparked outrage among some passengers and privacy advocates because the explicit images they display. Germany has already said it won't introduce them.

Authorities tested the scanners at Hamburg airport for 10 months on who volunteered. Among the findings, they said the machines' software proved too sensitive to things such as creases in suits.

Explore further: Researchers find security flaws in backscatter X-ray scanners

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New software to end 'naked' airport scans

Jul 20, 2011

In the face of an outcry over so-called "naked" body scans at airports, US authorities on Wednesday announced plans for a new scanning system that eliminates "passenger-specific images."

EU nations divided on use of airport body scanners

Jan 07, 2010

(AP) -- European nations were sharply divided Thursday over the need to install full-body scanners at European airports, with some EU members playing down the need for beefed-up security measures.

After foiled US plane attack, scanners revisited

Dec 29, 2009

As US lawmakers demand to know how a would-be attacker smuggled explosives aboard a plane on Christmas Day, the use of body scanners at airport security points is likely to be revisited.

Airport body scanners spreading across US

Mar 05, 2010

(AP) -- The Transportation Security Administration on Friday announced nine more U.S. airports that will receive body-scanning technology, as the U.S. heightens its effort to detect hidden explosives and ...

Better airport scanners delayed by privacy fears

Dec 28, 2009

(AP) -- High-tech security scanners that might have prevented the Christmas Day attempt to blow up a jetliner have been installed in only a small number of airports around the world, in large part because ...

Recommended for you

For secure software: X-rays instead of passport control

4 hours ago

Trust is good, control is better. This also applies to the security of computer programs. Instead of trusting "identification documents" in the form of certificates, JOANA, the new software analysis tool, examines the source ...

Razor-sharp TV pictures

6 hours ago

The future of movie, sports and concert broadcasting lies in 4K definition, which will bring cinema quality TV viewing into people's homes. 4K Ultra HD has four times as many pixels as today's Full HD. And ...

Michigan team finds security flaws in traffic lights

7 hours ago

What if attackers could manipulate traffic lights so that accidents would happen with mayhem as the result? That is a question many would rather put off for another day but authorities feeling responsible ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Lantern5
1 / 5 (1) Nov 14, 2011
It is a shame that the human race going to these extremes of animality. Remember the person who got on youtube naked girls images recorded with the device used at airports. We simply can not trust the moral quality of those who operate these machines. I doubt that the rich have to be reviewed with these devices when they lower their private jets. This technology is specifically imposed by the wealthy, but they did not leave review, the law is uneven in any country. This situation is worse than in the novel "1984" George Orwell. Besides having to endure the lack of privacy, they also have to go through humiliation own prisoners of concentration camps.
Lantern5
1 / 5 (1) Nov 14, 2011
This global Panopticon is only illusory shield against terrorism and crime, the real solution is to seek the welfare and happiness of all peoples of the world. In Latin America there would be many people helping drug dealers, if parents could give their families what they need to live with dignity, but of course, politicians prefer to steal 90% of the wealth of all Latin American countries, causing a spiral of violence unbeatable. We do not need an "Orwellian big brother" or a "Panopticon" what we need are leaders with a good heart.