Past decade ties for world's hottest: UN agency
November 29, 2011 by Marlowe Hood
Thirteen of the warmest years recorded have occurred within the last decade and a half, the UN's World Meteorological Organisation said on Tuesday.
Thirteen of the warmest years recorded have occurred within the last decade and a half, the UN's World Meteorological Organisation said on Tuesday.
The year 2011 caps a decade that ties the record as the hottest ever measured, the WMO said in a provisional report on climate trends and extreme weather events, unveiled at UN climate talks in Durban, South Africa.
"Our science is solid and it proves unequivocally that the world is warming and that this warming is due to human activities," WMO Secretary-General Michel Jarraud said in a statement, adding that policy makers should take note of the findings.
"Concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere have reached new highs and are very rapidly approaching levels consistent with a 2 to 2.4 Celsius rise in average global temperatures."
Scientists believe that any rise above the 2.0 threshold could trigger far-reaching and irreversible changes on Earth over land and in the seas.
The 2002-2011 period equals 2001-2010 as the warmest decade since 1850, the report said.
2011 ranks as the 10th warmest year since 1850, when accurate measurements began.
This was true despite a La Nina event -- one of the strongest in 60 years -- that developed in the tropical Pacific in the second half of 2010 and continued until May 2011.
Meterological events like La Nina, and its cousin El Nino, are not caused by climate change, but rising ocean temperatures caused by global warming may affect their intensity and frequency, scientists say.
The report noted that the cyclical climate phenomenon, which strikes every three to seven years, helped drive extreme weather events including droughts in east Africa, islands in the central equatorial Pacific and the southern United States.It also aggravated flooding in southern Africa, eastern Australia and southern Asia.
While La Nina, and its meteorological cousin El Nino, are not caused by climate change, rising ocean temperatures caused by global warming may affect their intensity and frequency, scientists say.
Average surface temperatures over land were above long-term averages in most regions.
Over northern Russia January to October temperatures were about 4.0 Celsius (7.2 Fahrenheit) above average in places. Nearby Finland had its hottest summer in 200 years.
Sea ice in the Arctic shrank to its second lowest surface area after 2007, and has reached record levels of thinness.
Extreme weather events in 2011 -- some influenced by La Nina -- included, by region:
EAST AFRICA: In a region where agriculture is almost entirely rain-fed, severe drought affected many countries through most of 2011, especially in northern Kenya, western Somalia and some parts of Ethiopia.
Some 13 million people required emergency aid, according to the UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).
Starting in October, many of the same areas were overwhelmed by flood-provoking rains.
Severe drought affected many East African countries through most of 2011, especially in northern Kenya, western Somalia and some parts of Ethiopia. Some 13 million people required emergency aid, according to the UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).
EAST ASIA: Rainfall during the 2011 monsoon season was far above average, with Thailand and Laos most affected. Floods claimed nearly 1,000 lives across Thailand, Cambodia and Myanmar.Severe flooding, exacerbated by high tides, affected many parts of Bangkok for several weeks from mid-October, causing economic damage of several billion dollars.
NORTH AMERICA: Fourteen weather-climate events in the United States each caused at least one billion dollars in losses.
Extreme drought affected a large swath of the south, especially Texas, where rainfall for the first 10 months of the year was a record 56 percent below normal.
Temperatures in the Lone Star state were also exceptionally hot, 3.0 C (5.4 F) above long-term averages.
Some northern and central states, by contrast, saw record rainfall, leading to severe flooding, as did areas hit by Hurricane Irene in August and Tropical Storm Lee the next month.
CENTRAL AND SOUTH AMERICA: Rainfall exceeding 200 millimetres (eight inches) in a few hours left at least 900 dead in the mountains north of Rio de Janeiro, one of the deadliest natural disasters in Brazil's history.
Central America experienced major flooding in October -- an astounding 1,513 millimetres (60.5 inches) of rain fell in Huizucar, El Salvador over 10 days. Guatemala, Nicaragua, Honduras and Costa Rica were also hit.
SOUTH ASIA: For the second year in a row, Pakistan saw severe flooding, though more localised -- in the south -- than in 2010. It was the wettest monsoon season on record for the province of Sindh.
(c) 2011 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
18 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
1 hour ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
3 hours ago |
4 / 5 (1) |
10
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
3 hours ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (14) |
39
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Almost half of new vets seek disability
(AP) -- America's newest veterans are filing for disability benefits at a historic rate, claiming to be the most medically and mentally troubled generation of former troops the nation has ever seen.


Nov 29, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (11)
Nov 29, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (9)
Nov 29, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
Nov 29, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
Nov 29, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
Nov 29, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (13)
Stop regurgitating long disproved lies.
"we were just beginning to emerge from the Little Ice Age" - TardChem
Nov 29, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (13)
The above graphic shows you to be a liar.
"We're cooler now than 80-90% of that time period." - Lying Denialist
Nov 29, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (13)
deatopmg - PhysOrg Member since September 24, 2007, 11:58 am
Nov 30, 2011
Rank: 4.6 / 5 (10)
Yeap. I noticed that too. Same with southwest Kansas, and KC Kansas had record breakers too. Longest hottest heat wave recorded.
Crops not doing well either and the water aquifer in SW Kansas is tapped from irrigation.
Nov 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (11)
Wow, the sock puppet voters got you! Doesn't matter what you say or how you say it, if it's against the liberal principles of 1-2 people on PhysOrg, you will get zapped by 5-10 "1" votes.
Sad, hypocritical, anti-social, anti-intellectual, and anti-science.
Nov 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (10)
Great source there big boy!
For those of you with a modicum of self-respect and intellectual curiosity, take a look at one critique of Vendicar's source:
"In September 2006, New Scientist was criticised by science fiction writer Greg Egan, who wrote that "a sensationalist bent and a lack of basic knowledge by its writers" was making the magazine's coverage sufficiently unreliable "to constitute a real threat to the public understanding of science"."
Nov 30, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (10)
Nov 30, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (10)
Whether it's Vendicar, bluehigh, kochevik, or whatever name you choose to post under, my post is valid.
The site chosen as Vendicar's reference has been criticized by many for its astoundingly bad representation of science information. Egan is only one of the most famous -- and vocal -- of those who have criticized it.
In addition, Egan himself is no fool. He has a B.S. in Mathematics, and his been widely praised for his style of "hard scifi", which means he predominantly writes about real events, with real science which he painstakingly researches. Vs. other sci-fi writers, like the imminent scientists Asimov or Clarke, who enjoyed adding more fantasy into the mix.
Bottom line, you can call names all day long. Facts don't change either way.
Nov 30, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Dec 01, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Here are some other older members
gmurphy Member since: September 24, 2007, 11:58 am
Parsec Member since: September 24, 2007, 11:58 am
mabarker Member since: September 24, 2007, 11:57 am I used to see posts from Ma back to 2005.
Valentiinro Member since: September 24, 2007, 11:58 am
The ever popular
omatumr Member since: September 24, 2007, 11:57 am
So older members all have about the start time.
Ethelred
Dec 01, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
His remark about New Scientist may be correct in general though.
HOWEVER that does not change the facts.
That is three different people. Bluehigh is an Ausie, VD is a Canuck Troll and Kochevik is deranged.
The graph was not the product of New Scientist. They just published it. It would be nice to know the original source. My guess it that it is based on isotope ratios, perhaps from ice cores.
Ethelred
Dec 01, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
How ConservaTard of him.
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I don't take seriously extrapolations of past temperature changes of a mere 0.1 to 0.5C based on core samples.
We all know ocean currents and wave actions can carry animal remains much farther than the temperature range itself, and that graphic is a little absurd plotting all these "data" points as though they actually mean anything compared to actual thermometer data in the past 117 years of the modern record.
That said, you can't argue with the modern data either.
We know there's less ice than there ever has been since at least the 1400's.
Dallas/Fort Worth broke their record high almost every day this summer.
They broke and then re-broke the ALL TIME record high SEVEN times during this summer 2011, and a couple other stations broke their ALL TIME record highs more than once this year.
It's a pretty damn big deal when you break the ALL TIME record high 5 to 7 times in one year. That means they had SEVEN days that were hotter than ANY day in history...
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
This year was a "neutral" year in the 11-year solar cycle.
I don't know about longer solar cycles, but I've seen a graphic recently of the 11 year cycle.
Next 3 years "should" be the "hottest" 3 years in the 11 year cycle.
Takes 3 years for the low peak on the Keeling Curve to be strictly worse than the present high peak, so intuitively, 2013 and 2014 ought to be real scorchers, because both the solar cycle and the CO2 will be strictly worse than they are now. That is, the minimum seasonal greenhouse effect from CO2 will be worse than the maximum was this year.
Four, five, six years from now we'll be in neutral solar cycle years again, just like we are now, but then again, the CO2 will be 9 to 13 PPM worse, if not a bit more than that...
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
People actually believe, as fact, what comes from the UN? The least trustworthy organization (behind the Comintern, the DNC and Taliban) in the world?
And they don't believe, Freeman Dyson when he says, "The polar bears will be fine"?
Dyson is smarter, more knowledgeable, and better able to judge the strength and weaknesses of data synthesis than anyone at the UN; or even all of them, combined.
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
http://www.wunder...num=1995
Hey everyone! The Condor will be fine too, right!
But Dyson might be right anyway. Polar bears probably don't actually "need" ice, they're just designed to deal with it. They can probably compete with other animals in surrounding habitats if forced to do so, after all, they are the largest bear and highly intelligent...they just got all that white fur to hide in the forest, but maybe a few will get lucky and mutate some pigment genes back into their genomes...
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
The chart you posted shows that we are much cooler now (the black line) than we have been for most of the list 12000 years, and all of the last 6000 (with the exception of the little ice age).
You are typical of the warmist faithful, such absolute confirmation bias that you will post a chart which destroys your argument as though it supported it.
Hilarious.
http://www.newsci..._600.jpg
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Sounds silly, perhaps even preposterous, doesn't it?
Good thing we have a great many of their own emails attesting to their fraud. In context even!
Face it, Nanobanano, the liars got caught.
Sadly, in this political environment, getting caught might not be enough for them to get punished. And given the state of climate "science", I wouldn't be surprised if they ended up giving themselves awards.