Carbon cycling was much smaller during last ice age than in today's climate: study
Atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is one of the most important greenhouse gases and the increase of its abundance in the atmosphere by fossil fuel burning is the main cause of future global warming. In past times, during the transition between an ice age and a warm period, atmospheric CO2 concentrations changed by some 100 parts per million (ppm) from an ice age value of 180 ppm to about 280 ppm during warm periods.
Scientists can reconstruct these changes in the atmospheric carbon stock using direct measurements of atmospheric CO2 trapped in air bubbles in the depth of Antarctica's ice sheets. However explaining the cause of these 100ppm changes in atmospheric CO2 concentrations between glacial and interglacial climate states as well as estimating the carbon stored on land and in the ocean is far more difficult.
The researchers, led by Dr Philippe Ciais of the Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et l'Environnement near Paris, ingeniously combined measurements of isotopes of atmospheric oxygen (18O) and carbon (13C) in marine sediments and ice cores with results from dynamic global vegetation models, the latter being driven by estimates of glacial climate using climate models.
Dr Marko Scholze of the University of Bristol's School of Earth Sciences, co-author on the paper said: "The difference between glacial and pre-industrial carbon stored in the terrestrial biosphere is only about 330 petagrams of carbon, which is much smaller than previously thought. The uptake of carbon by vegetation and soil, that is the terrestrial productivity during the ice age, was only about 40 petagrams of carbon per year and thus much smaller: roughly one third of present-day terrestrial productivity and roughly half of pre-industrial productivity."
From these results, the authors conclude that the cycling of carbon in the terrestrial biosphere that is, the time between uptake by photosynthesis and release by decomposition of dead plant material must have been much smaller than in the current, warmer climate.
Furthermore there must have been a much larger size of non-decomposable carbon on land during the Last Glacial Maximum (the period in the Earth's history when ice sheets were at their maximum extension, between 26,500 and 19,000 years ago).
The authors suggest that this inert carbon should have been buried in the permanently frozen soils and large amounts of peat of the northern tundra regions.
More information: 'Large inert carbon pool in the terrestrial biosphere during the Last Glacial Maximum' by P. Ciais, A. Tagliabue, M. Cuntz, L. Bopp, M. Scholze, G. Hoffmann, A. Lourantou, S. P. Harrison, I. C. Prentice, D. I. Kelley, C. Koven and S. L. Piao, Nature Geoscience, 2011.
Journal reference:
Nature Geoscience
Provided by
University of Bristol
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
18 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
1 hour ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
3 hours ago |
4 / 5 (1) |
10
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
3 hours ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (14) |
39
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Almost half of new vets seek disability
(AP) -- America's newest veterans are filing for disability benefits at a historic rate, claiming to be the most medically and mentally troubled generation of former troops the nation has ever seen.
Nov 20, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (14)
Nov 20, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (15)
In fact Earth's climate has always changed. Life evolves because Earth's heat source - the Sun - changes and continues to evolve.
http://judithcurr...t-140333
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
http://myprofile....anuelo09
Nov 20, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (12)
Nov 20, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (17)
In addition, CO2 is only a minor GH gas. Water vapor is THE major GH gas and major temperature modulator.
Nov 21, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (6)
Nov 21, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
Yes, all those problematic air bubbles trapped in the Antarctic ice are just a practical joke left by God when he created Earth 4004 BC. Just like all those dinosaur fossils (sarcasm).
If anyone says anything that challenges my beliefs, I will simply assume it is a global conspiracy, financed by the communtist-nazis and Opus Dei. With a bit of help from the Martians.
Anyway, who needs elitisty "scientific facts" and "truth" when "truthiness"* (my random assumptions and beliefs) is more comforting
[* a term invented by that great thinker and statesman G. W. Bush]
Nov 21, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
The atmosphere does contributed to GW, that includes a CO2 factor(The sum of which is most likely better said through entropy). The dedicated scientist know that the science still needs tweaking... (dagnamit, I wanted to concentrate on other areas of physics, but that may have to change).
Again, this is probably better addressed via tracking relative changes in entropy.
Oliver is right in that the sun provides the energy which drives the earths temperature. However, changes to the earths equilibrium in the continuous capacity is the real issue. We can know this...
Nov 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
And your point is?
1. Humans do not directly alter the concentration of water vapour significantly, contrary to CO2
2. Water vapour increases the effect of CO2 by positive feedback
Nov 21, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
I'm sure, that after doing a comparative area accretion rate comparison between the earth and moon, that Oliver's underlying implied sun-changes can be correctly mitigated.
Nov 21, 2011
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (4)
And you may notice that the article doesn't say a word about global warming or the connection of CO2 thereto.
Declaring something 'drivel' for something it doesn't state just shows that you have either not read the article or haven't understood it (and therefore are supremely unqualified to comment on it)
Nov 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
The article doesn't...but the commentary preceding the article does state a direct correlation to CO2 and future warming. Therefore we can sight an innate lack of intelligence as the reason deatopmg should not be commenting. GHG's trap heat in the atmosphere, CO2 has been proven to be a GHG, therefore the more of it there is, the less heat it will allow to escape. That is as simply put as i can make it, if you do not understand, go hang out at the FOX website with the rest of your IQ bracket.
Nov 22, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
It's not that simple.
there is around a 27 L per gram conversion for combusted fossil fuels.
Do the math just on the Worlds daily Global fossil fuel consumption, and do a volume analysis. Then answer the question
Where does all that volume go to? To help give you insight, ask "how come the earths atmosphere boundary doesn't keep expanding?"... "And how come the oceans are only at the present level of acidity?"
Explain the diffence
Nov 22, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Nov 22, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
The science I want to concentrate is not GW. There is no solution in GW. So, I leave it here, to be most likely mitigated.