Activists push for end to US-Canada pipeline plan

Nov 07, 2011 by Michael Langan
Demonstrators gather in front of the White House in Washington, DC. Thousands of protesters rallied outside the White House on Sunday to press US President Barack Obama to scrap plans for a multi-billion-dollar oil pipeline stretching from Canada to Texas.

Thousands of protesters rallied outside the White House on Sunday to press US President Barack Obama to scrap plans for a multi-billion-dollar oil pipeline stretching from Canada to Texas.

"Our mainstream society is extremely destructive and exploitative. This is one of the most egregious examples of over-exploitation," Ken Srdjak, 25, an artist from Ohio, told AFP.

Completing the pipeline would mean "harming indigenous peoples and the environment," he argued.

Washington has launched consultations on the 1,700-mile (2,700-kilometer) Keystone XL pipeline which would run from the of the Canadian province of Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico in the southern United States.

Many environmentalists fear a potential pipeline accident would spell disaster for aquifers in central US Great Plains states. That could disproportionately endanger rural towns and Native Americans, they say.

Thousands of demonstrators, including Oscar-nominated actor Mark Ruffalo and 1997 Nobel peace laureate Jody Williams, crammed Lafayette Square opposite the White House, as Obama was out playing golf.

Hundreds protested in vibrant orange vests reading Stop Keystone XL, while others waved signs with slogans such as "We believe in a better way -- if it doesn't involve tar sands" and "Pipeline to the Apocalypse."

Dozens more, most in their 20s, danced to pop music in front of a soundstage waving their protest banners less than a block from the White House.

Lauren Glapa, 19, rode a bus overnight from Indiana University for her first protest with dozens of classmates to make their voices heard.

"So many people don't know anything about this issue. Obviously Obama does, and I don't know what he is going to do. But if we increase awareness, maybe he will do the right thing," she said, readying for the long ride home.

The Keystone XL pipeline proposed by TransCanada would begin in Alberta in western Canada and pass through the US states of Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma before ending up at refineries in Texas.

A number of environmental and citizen groups are fighting the pipeline because exploiting the unconventional oil sands of Alberta requires energy that produces a large volume of greenhouse gases.

Concerns about potential for an environmental disaster seem to be heightened on the heels of last year's devastating BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

The US State Department is handling public consultations as the pipeline would run across the border with Canada.

But it said Wednesday it might not decide whether to issue a permit for the proposed by the end of 2011 as planned.

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said the "first priority" is to ensure the pipeline's potential environmental impact is carefully studied, not to meet the year-end goal set by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Explore further: Conservation scientists asking wrong questions on climate change impacts on wildlife

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Impact statement on US oil pipeline due in August

Jul 23, 2011

The US State Department said Friday it expects by mid-August to release a final environmental impact statement on a proposed $13 billion oil pipeline that would stretch from Canada to Texas.

US sees no major harm from Keystone XL pipeline

Aug 26, 2011

The proposed Keystone XL pipeline that would bring oil from Canada's tar sands to the US Gulf Coast would have "no significant impact" on the environment, the United States said Friday.

Proposed pipeline could cost jobs, not create them

Oct 03, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Claims of job creation by the TransCanada Corp. Keystone XL Pipeline are inflated at best and misleading at worst, according to a new report by the ILR Global Labor Institute (GLI) posted on its website.

Beaver dam partly contains Canada oil spill

May 05, 2011

An oil spill near the native village of Little Buffalo in Canada's Alberta province was partly contained by a beaver dam, a provincial environment official said Wednesday.

Recommended for you

Big data confirms climate extremes are here to stay

20 hours ago

In a paper published online today in the journal Scientific Reports, published by Nature, Northeastern researchers Evan Kodra and Auroop Ganguly found that while global temperature is indeed increasing, so too is the variab ...

Peru's carbon quantified: Economic and conservation boon

20 hours ago

Today scientists unveiled the first high-resolution map of the carbon stocks stored on land throughout the entire country of PerĂº. The new and improved methodology used to make the map marks a sea change ...

How might climate change affect our food supply?

21 hours ago

It's no easy question to answer, but prudence demands that we try. Thus, Microsoft and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) have teamed up to tackle "food resilience," one of several themes ...

Groundwater is safe in potential N.Y. fracking area

21 hours ago

Two Cornell hydrologists have completed a thorough groundwater examination of drinking water in a potential hydraulic fracturing area in New York's Southern Tier. They determined that drinking water in potable ...

User comments : 0