Visions of a 'car-free future'
City centers could become virtually car-free over the next 20 years under new plans proposed by University of Leeds transport researchers.
The year is 2030. Traffic jams and smog have been banished from city centres and replaced with tree-lined boulevards where commuters walk or cycle to a much greater extent than now; electric bicycles and airport style travelators have become common modes of travel.
It might sound like the setting for a science fiction film, but this is just one scenario outlined by scientists who aim to create urban environments which are safer, more sociable and less environmentally damaging.
The team have produced three 'visions' of future UK cities where up to 80% of all journeys are made by bike or on foot and where cars and lorries are virtually obsolete. Their proposals, published in the Journal of Transport Geography, are illustrated by animations and images of how these cities may look.
Each of the visions presents a scenario where a number of changes have been made to the infrastructure of urban areas. These range from relatively minor adjustments, to major shifts in society and infrastructure that would cut car journeys from around 60% of all trips to just 5%.
This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
Lead author Dr. Miles Tight, from the University of Leeds Institute for Transport Studies, said the benefits of such changes would go beyond simply reducing congestion. "Walking and cycling can make a considerable contribution to sustainable transport goals, but getting people out of their cars and onto their feet or a bicycle has the potential to address many other problems which blight urban areas, including road accidents, air and noise pollution, and obesity," he said."The kinds of changes we're talking about are not beyond the realms of possibility. Obviously we don't expect people to give up their cars overnight, but we want to show people what cities could look like if walking and cycling played a much larger role and what the implications might be for lifestyle, behaviour and logistics."
More details of the three visions can be found below.
Vision 1: Change to current European best practice
Similar to present-day European centers such as Copenhagen or Delft
Moderate increases in walking and a major increase in cycling, better public transport and reduced number of car journeys (one in three journeys made on foot, one in ten by bike)
Private car ownership reduced by 50% in urban areas, one in three journeys still made by car
Greater control over drivers: Intelligent Speed Adaptation, road pricing, etc.
Safer cycle paths and more pleasant pedestrian environments
Car journeys remain for trips impossible by bike or foot
Freight transport still largely undertaken by lorries and vans.
Vision 2: Dramatic social change, major reduction in car use
Car is now the minority mode of transport (just 5% of journeys), partly curtailed by government intervention
Car ownership is limited to those with mobility problems or for emergency use
Public transport significantly improved, with door-to-door service in some areas
Freight carried by public transport at off-peak times and more freight distribution in the evenings to avoid congestion
A 'garden city' approach to regional development with communities largely independent from the central urban area
Better road safety, reduced pollution and greater sense of 'community'
Vision 3: Extreme change brought about by fuel shortages
Society blighted by a large-scale energy shortages
Smart technology such as electric bikes, information systems and segways allow walking and cycling to become predominant mode of urban transport (80% of journeys).
Less public transport than vision 2 given the energy shortage
Major shift in land use with employment and services becoming localised in several 'urban villages'
Freight transported from distribution centres at the edge of urban area to locations in the city via bicycle and electric vehicles.
With the visions in place, the team are in the process of discussing with city authorities how the changes required might be achieved in the specific context of a number of towns and cities in the UK.
"Experience has shown us that simply making small changes like adding a bit of cycle lane here and there is not going to lead to large-scale sustainable change. A real paradigm shift from driving to walking and cycling is going to take government-led intervention on a large scale," added Dr. Tight.
More information: http://www.visions2030.org.uk/
Provided by
University of Leeds
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Need a rigid insulation material???
17 hours ago
-
magnets or EMF in car bumpers to protect from fender bender
May 26, 2012
-
length of wire in a coil of known dimensions?
May 25, 2012
-
India Engineering Powerhouse
May 25, 2012
-
electromagnet core dereference between hard and soft iron
May 25, 2012
-
Measuring water pressure in an open tank
May 24, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Engineering
More news stories
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
10 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
3
Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study
Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
3.6 / 5 (22) |
56
|
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22
Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (12) |
18
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
Almost half of new vets seek disability
(AP) -- America's newest veterans are filing for disability benefits at a historic rate, claiming to be the most medically and mentally troubled generation of former troops the nation has ever seen.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (14)
Why is it that every time you hear of some plans like this, it's not about making it better to travel on foot or by bike, but about deliberately making ownership and use of cars more difficult. "Dramatic social change" as it's called.
Why do people use cars? Because it saves time and effort. Why don't people walk? Because it's cumbersome and takes more time. Forcing the cars out of the city just means that the people will drive outside of the city for their groceries and furniture, and entertainment and whatnot.
I live in an "European best practices" type of city where some streets are closed off for cars, and the streets are narrow and maze-like so everybody just parks their cars outside of the center and walks everywhere. Guess where I like to go shopping?
Five miles outside of the city where there's room to turn.
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (9)
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (14)
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (5)
The BIG problem comes when pedestrian, light transport (bicycles, segways, carts), and heavy transport (cars, trucks, buses) must share the same right-of-way. In a conflict, pedestrians and bicyclists can only lose.
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (11)
I never felt more free or mobile as when I didn't have a car there, just a sweet bike (as well as awesome public transit).
Buy this car to drive to work. Drive to work to pay for this car.
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (14)
If you work somewhere besides McDonalds the phrase "Drive to work to pay for this car" has little meaning. My car expenses, including maintenance and fuel, cannot even be expressed as a whole number percentage of my income.
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (11)
Your liberty ends where your destruction of my environment starts.
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (9)
It's because you are a whining, pea-brained, loser.
see my comment above.
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (9)
The average car now costs around $8,000 a year to own and run - this includes amortized purchase costs.
If this is less than 1 percent of your income then your income must be on the order of 1 million per year after taxes.
The average wage of adequately employed Americans is about $35,000, so car ownership eats up about 1/4 of their wages.
Oct 20, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Oct 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Netherlands is small, densly populated and has decent biking roads. Public transport can be much better though, and depends on where u live. Its great in rotterdam and amsterdam and den haag. In other places it doesnt work well for jobs.
Oct 21, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
I don't own a car. Never have, never will.
Oct 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Liar.
Oct 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
So you alone own the environment, and you've decided that cars necessarily destroy it, now and forever?
How about adressing the other 90% of the sources of pollution before forcing everyone to give up basic transportation and the freedom of movement?
There's two ways of dealing with a sore thumb: you could heal it, or you could lop it off. What you, and all the other "social engineers" are proposing is to have a society without thumbs.
Oct 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Yet even you benefit from the fact that most other people do.
Otherwise you'd probably have no work, no goods brought to your local market, and pretty much no other people around your part of suburbia because the whole place wouldn't exist.
And there would be nobody you could bum a ride from, when you actually need to go somewhere else than where the bus stops.
Oct 21, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Oct 21, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
That's sad, I'm sorry you're so poor, or that you live in an urban death trap.
Oct 21, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
This is your first mistake, buying a ridiculously expensive car. I bought my car used with 30 something thousand miles on it and paid just over 8k for it... it's not a shit box either it's a full size sedan with a power sunroof, 17" alloy wheels, component audio system with subwoofer, etc... Specifically, it's a Pontiac Grand Prix. Assuming I'll own it for about 10 years it won't even cost me $1000 a year, of course I do all my own repair and maintenance work.
I make about 1/10th that, about 80% of my income is salary, 15% dividends, and 5% I earned last year from selling PC/Android apps.
That's pathetic.
Oct 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Oct 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Want to elaborate on that? What aspect is pathetic?
Oct 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
How many "aspects" were there in the quoted text that I might be referring to?
"The average wage of adequately employed Americans is about $35,000, so car ownership eats up about 1/4 of their wages."
That's pathetic... there is only one aspect there, the relative poverty of the American people, 35,000 a year is borderline poverty... That salary is pathetic and spending 25% of your income on your car is pathetic.
Oct 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
Oct 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Your life is a mountain of trash and several million stadiums full of poisonous gas. And you think the people who live on less are pathetic?
Oct 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Oct 23, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Or a brain.
Oct 23, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
I have no clue what you are talking about.
Oct 23, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (2)
The who industry around cars is pretty corrupt and mind bogglingly wasteful. Big petrol killed the pure latex tire industry so that you have to buy tires that need to be replaced at a cost of $500 per set.
The point is that you should ride a bike WHEN YOU CAN which is a huge percentage of the time. Or hell if you're too much of a fat lazy garbage can get a scooter and put-put yer fat ass around without using the 7 unnecessary cylinders in your queer ass hummer or ford F890 ( get it, the 89 is for buttsechs)
Seriously the amount of pollutants a car puts out will shorten your life by a good percentage.
Oct 23, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (8)
Wow you're an idiot or your perspective is so narrow you must be living under a rock... I live on 22 acres of land, my closest neighbor is 3 miles away, the closest store is almost 7 miles away... I am not biking 14 miles to get some milk.
I feel truly sorry for those that live in cities, you will never know what a dark night is, you will never know what quite is. With the lights out in my house at night you can't see ANYTHING, there is no light outside to come in the windows, there is no sound of cars to keep me up at night, I can see the stars every single night using my telescope in my sun room...
point is, not everyone lives in urban death trap
Oct 24, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Why should we subsidize your lifestyle? You realize there is a shit load of extra roads paved so selfish assholes can live out in the middle of nowhere, right? Maybe you should have to pay to pave the 3 miles of road between you and your nearest neighbor? You should also have to pay a premium for postal delivery. Quit leeching off my tax dollars.
Oct 24, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
You guys really need to walk around in each other's shoes for awhile so you each have a clue what the other is talking about.
Oct 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Oct 24, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
Jesus Christ you are stupid... Ever heard of farming? No? You have no idea what you are talking about.
Oct 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Dear Dr. Tight,
Please don't shift your paradigm on my account. I would prefer to drive. Thanks!
Oct 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
All well and good. For you. As long as you get out of the way of my car.
Oct 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Vendicar, your obnoxious rants, self-aggrandizing behavior and comebacks that amount to "nanny-nanny-boo-boo" are bad enough. Why do you feel it is also necessary to resort to fourth-grade name calling? Labeling everyone with whom you do not agree a Tard is the lowliest and, I suppose, easiest way to show us your state of ignorance. Furthermore, it is clearly against Physorg's comment guidelines. Here's hoping they cut you off.
Oct 24, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Oct 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
The question is, how do you define destruction? There must be hundreds of actions we each take daily that have a non-benign effect on the environment. For example, Vendicar, when you excrete solid and liquid waste, you are polluting my environment. Should we take away your liberty?
It's absurd to point to a single human activity and say, "yep, that's the one I don't like, so we should ban that one."