Study finds unprecedented Arctic ozone loss
Left: Ozone in Earth's stratosphere at an altitude of approximately 12 miles (20 kilometers) in mid-March 2011, near the peak of the 2011 Arctic ozone loss. Right: chlorine monoxide - the primary agent of chemical ozone destruction in the cold polar lower stratosphere - for the same day and altitude. Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
(PhysOrg.com) -- A NASA-led study has documented an unprecedented depletion of Earth's protective ozone layer above the Arctic last winter and spring caused by an unusually prolonged period of extremely low temperatures in the stratosphere.
The study, published online Sunday, Oct. 2, in the journal Nature, finds the amount of ozone destroyed in the Arctic in 2011 was comparable to that seen in some years in the Antarctic, where an ozone "hole" has formed each spring since the mid-1980s. The stratospheric ozone layer, extending from about 10 to 20 miles (15 to 35 kilometers) above the surface, protects life on Earth from the sun's harmful ultraviolet rays.
The Antarctic ozone hole forms when extremely cold conditions, common in the winter Antarctic stratosphere, trigger reactions that convert atmospheric chlorine from human-produced chemicals into forms that destroy ozone. The same ozone-loss processes occur each winter in the Arctic. However, the generally warmer stratospheric conditions there limit the area affected and the time frame during which the chemical reactions occur, resulting in far less ozone loss in most years in the Arctic than in the Antarctic.
To investigate the 2011 Arctic ozone loss, scientists from 19 institutions in nine countries (United States, Germany, The Netherlands, Canada, Russia, Finland, Denmark, Japan and Spain) analyzed a comprehensive set of measurements. These included daily global observations of trace gases and clouds from NASA's Aura and CALIPSO spacecraft; ozone measured by instrumented balloons; meteorological data and atmospheric models. The scientists found that at some altitudes, the cold period in the Arctic lasted more than 30 days longer in 2011 than in any previously studied Arctic winter, leading to the unprecedented ozone loss. Further studies are needed to determine what factors caused the cold period to last so long.
"Day-to-day temperatures in the 2010-11 Arctic winter did not reach lower values than in previous cold Arctic winters," said lead author Gloria Manney of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., and the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology in Socorro. "The difference from previous winters is that temperatures were low enough to produce ozone-destroying forms of chlorine for a much longer time. This implies that if winter Arctic stratospheric temperatures drop just slightly in the future, for example as a result of climate change, then severe Arctic ozone loss may occur more frequently."
The 2011 Arctic ozone loss occurred over an area considerably smaller than that of the Antarctic ozone holes. This is because the Arctic polar vortex, a persistent large-scale cyclone within which the ozone loss takes place, was about 40 percent smaller than a typical Antarctic vortex. While smaller and shorter-lived than its Antarctic counterpart, the Arctic polar vortex is more mobile, often moving over densely populated northern regions. Decreases in overhead ozone lead to increases in surface ultraviolet radiation, which are known to have adverse effects on humans and other life forms.
Although the total amount of Arctic ozone measured was much more than twice that typically seen in an Antarctic spring, the amount destroyed was comparable to that in some previous Antarctic ozone holes. This is because ozone levels at the beginning of Arctic winter are typically much greater than those at the beginning of Antarctic winter.
Manney said that without the 1989 Montreal Protocol, an international treaty limiting production of ozone-depleting substances, chlorine levels already would be so high that an Arctic ozone hole would form every spring. The long atmospheric lifetimes of ozone-depleting chemicals already in the atmosphere mean that Antarctic ozone holes, and the possibility of future severe Arctic ozone loss, will continue for decades.
"Our ability to quantify polar ozone loss and associated processes will be reduced in the future when NASA's Aura and CALIPSO spacecraft, whose trace gas and cloud measurements were central to this study, reach the end of their operational lifetimes," Manney said. "It is imperative that this capability be maintained if we are to reliably predict future ozone loss in a changing climate."
Provided by
JPL/NASA
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
16 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
1 hour ago |
not rated yet |
8
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
1 hour ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (14) |
39
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Same gene that stunts infants' growth also makes them grow too big: research
UCLA geneticists have identified the mutation responsible for IMAGe* syndrome, a rare disorder that stunts infants' growth. The twist? The mutation occurs on the same gene that causes Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, which makes ...
Scientists develop ultra-sensitive test that detects diseases in their earliest stages
Scientists have developed an ultra-sensitive test that should enable them to detect signs of a disease in its earliest stages, in research published today in the journal Nature Materials.
Oct 02, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
Oct 02, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (7)
at the height of the environmental disaster cries did anyone notice that nobody mentioned the ozone layer?
til now that is...
Oct 02, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (11)
Oct 02, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (7)
Oct 02, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (16)
After WikiLeaks and SPACE.com exposed the Trojan Horse [1] and the truth about variable Earth's heat source:
www.space.com/131...ing.html
Environmentalism was a Trojan Horse we welcomed unaware that science [2,3] would be sacrificed for:
Redistribution of wealth [1] under a one-world government.
Conclusions:
A. The Great Reality [4] is greater than dogmatic science.
B. Communion is greater than dogmatic communism.
C. God is much greater than any dogmatic religion.
D. Cowards hide under various dogmatic cloaks.
Regretfully it took me forty years (1971-2011) to decipher this.
1. www.nature.com/ne...20110929
2. www.nature.com/na...9a0.html
3. www.omatumr.com/a...nces.pdf
4. www.youtube.com/w...vJiyeLIo
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://myprofile....anuelo09
Oct 02, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
Oct 02, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
How about you question your assumptions? Had you read the article carefully, you'd know that they are talking about Arctic ozone levels, not the Antarctic, which WAS in the news all those years ago and which has improved somewhat over the years.
But the two polar 'holes' are quite different. The Arctic situation is generally more stable, less prone to seasonal fluctuations due to more efficient heat transport in the northern hemisphere. The south is more prone to cold snaps (in the upper atmosphere) which affects ozone levels there more frequently. That's why this is a significant result as it speaks to the northern (Arctic) ozone depletion levels.
Also the effects of the now banned pollutants are long lived and will be with us for at least another thirty years.
Oct 02, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
You know, at first I thought "What densely populated areas under the Artic polar vortex?" until I saw this:
http://www.resear...zone.htm
You will notice that the Arctic polar vortex does indeed move around quite a bit. You can double click on the first color map to expand it.
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (11)
"...the cold period in the Arctic lasted more than 30 days longer in 2011 than in any previously studied Arctic winter..."
Global "warming" strikes again! LOL
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (8)
Did you imagine you were being clever, or something? Dream on.
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (5)
Space.com did no such thing. That article did not support you in anyway. For that matter neither have you.
So just how do Neutron Stars form when neutron repulsion is alleged by you to be so powerful that it stops Black Holes from forming no matter how large the mass?
Ignoring the question won't magically make you right Oliver. The ideas are contradictory and I bet even the Plasma Universe Cranks can see that now that it has been pointed out.
Ethelred
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
LOL Ethelred, you (rightly) accuse of Ollie of spamming, and then you proceed to do exactly the same thing by submitting the above post all over the place!
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Yes. My misplaced faith: The Holy Grail of causes for the worsening dynamics of ozone holes. Now there more to it than meets the ban.
Had this been predicted the need to ask that a capability be maintained for reliably prediction becomes moot.
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
"...the positive radiative forcing from greenhouse gases overwhelms the sulphate aerosol forcing at the end of the 21st century..."
http://www.grida..../351.htm
Right. This is a feedback loop caused by LOW temperatures and CFC induced ozone depletion. It must initially be COLD for it to begin.
http://www.wunder...ling.asp
cont...
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Obviously, too clever for you.
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
http://www.wunder...ling.asp
Enlighten me please, what is the great allure of bloviating on matters for which you clearly don't have a grasp of even the most basic underlying theory or facts? What's so great about flaunting your ignorance and making an idiot of yourself on public fora?Yeah, hilarious. Now show me where in the above article is global warming mentioned even once.And for yourself, which apparently isn't saying much.
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (4)
The way I figure it is if enough of us respond in kind Physorg will have to finally respond instead of ignore the way he violates the site. I doubt if even the Insane Immoderator would start deleting my posts without deleting the posts I am responding to.
Join The Cause. Force Physorg To Enforce Their Own Rules On Oliver.
COUNTER SPAM OLIVER NOW.
Ethelred
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
They COULD allow us to change our votes. That would be a good thing.
Ethelred
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
I wouldn't know. Maybe you should ask this of yourself.
You must be a bot, 'cause you obviously have no sense of humor, and apparently don't even recognize there's a world beyond the webpage.
Ah, did I hurt the widdle bots' feelings? There, there. It'll be alright.
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
It's no surprise you don't understand:
"The hypothetical person lacking a sense of humour would likely find the behaviour induced by humour to be inexplicable, strange, or even irrational."
http://en.wikiped...i/Humour
Humor doesn't need a proper context to be funny. A ridiculous incongruity, itself, is often the basis of humor. But for the humor to become apparent, the incongruity must be resolved. You're just having trouble resolving the incongruity.
Here's a paper that might teach you the value of humor in regards to science:
http://www.logika...1/tm.pdf
Oct 03, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (2)
I know you are, but what am I?
Oct 04, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Oct 04, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
"This is your baby."
(An attempt to fulfill a label defined above as humor.)
Oct 04, 2011
Rank: not rated yet