Subtly shaded map of moon reveals titanium treasure troves
LROC WAC mosaic showing boundary between Mare Serenitatis and Mare Tranquillitatis. The relative blue colour of the Tranquillitatis mare is due to higher abundances of the titanium bearing mineral ilmenite. Enhanced colour formed as 689 nm filter image in red, 415 nm in green, and 321 nm in blue [NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University].
(PhysOrg.com) -- A map of the Moon combining observations in visible and ultraviolet wavelengths shows a treasure trove of areas rich in Titanium ores. Not only is Titanium a valuable mineral, it is key to helping scientists unravel the mysteries of the Moons interior. Mark Robinson and Brett Denevi will be presenting the results from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission today at the joint meeting of the European Planetary Science Congress and the American Astronomical Societys Division for Planetary Sciences.
Looking up at the Moon, its surface appears painted with shades of grey at least to the human eye. But with the right instruments, the Moon can appear colourful, said Robinson, of Arizona State University. The maria appear reddish in some places and blue in others. Although subtle, these colour variations tell us important things about the chemistry and evolution of the lunar surface. They indicate the titanium and iron abundance, as well as the maturity of a lunar soil.
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Wide Angle Camera (WAC) is imaging the surface in seven different wavelengths at a resolution of between 100 and 400 metres per pixel. Specific minerals reflect or absorb strongly certain parts of the electromagnetic spectrum, so the wavelengths detected by LROC WAC help scientists better understand the chemical composition of the lunar surface.
Robinson and his team previously developed a technique using Hubble Space Telescope images to map titanium abundances around a small area centred on the Apollo 17 landing site. Samples around the site spanned a broad range of titanium levels. By comparing the Apollo data from the ground with the Hubble images, the team found that the titanium levels corresponded to the ratio of ultraviolet to visible light reflected by the lunar soils.
Our challenge was to find out whether the technique would work across broad areas, or whether there was something special about the Apollo 17 area, said Robinson.
Robinsons team constructed a mosaic from around 4000 LRO WAC images collected over one month. Using the technique they had developed with the Hubble imagery, they used the WAC ratio of the brightness in the ultraviolet to visible light to deduce titanium abundance, backed up by surface samples gathered by Apollo and Luna missions.
The highest titanium abundances on Earth are around xx percent. The new map shows that in the mare titanium abundances range from about one percent to a little more than ten percent. In the highlands, everywhere TiO2 is less than one percent. The new titanium values match those measured in the ground samples to about one percent.
We still dont really understand why we find much higher abundances of titanium on the Moon compared to similar types of rocks on Earth. What the lunar titanium-richness does tell us is that the interior of the Moon had less oxygen when it was formed, knowledge that geochemists value for understanding the evolution of the Moon, said Robinson.
Lunar titanium is mostly found in the mineral ilmenite, a compound containing iron, titanium and oxygen. Future miners living and working on the Moon could break down ilmenite to liberate these elements. In addition, Apollo data shows that titanium-rich minerals are more efficient at retaining particles from the solar wind, such as helium and hydrogen. These gases would also provide a vital resource for future human inhabitants of lunar colonies.
The new map is a valuable tool for lunar exploration planning. Astronauts will want to visit places with both high scientific value and a high potential for resources that can be used to support exploration activities. Areas with high titanium provide both a pathway to understanding the interior of the Moon and potential mining resources, said Denevi, from John Hopkins University.
The new maps also shed light on how space weather changes the lunar surface. Over time, the lunar surface materials are altered by the impact of charged particles from the solar wind and high-velocity micrometeorite impacts. Together these processes work to pulverize rock into a fine powder and alter the surfaces chemical composition and hence its colour. Recently exposed rocks, such as the rays that are thrown out around impact craters, appear bluer and have higher reflectance than more mature soil. Over time this young material darkens and reddens, disappearing into the background after about 500 million years.
One of the exciting discoveries weve made is that the effects of weathering show up much more quickly in ultraviolet than in visible or infrared wavelengths. In the LROC ultraviolet mosaics, even craters that we thought were very young appear relatively mature. Only small, very recently formed craters show up as fresh regolith exposed on the surface, said Robinson.
The mosaics have also given important clues to why lunar swirls sinuous features associated with magnetic fields in the lunar crust are highly reflective. The new data suggest that when a magnetic field is present, it deflects the charged solar wind, slowing the maturation process and resulting in the bright swirl. The rest of the Moons surface, which does not benefit from the protective shield of a magnetic field, is more rapidly weathered by the solar wind. This result may suggest that bombardment by charged particles may be more important than micrometeorites in weathering the Moons surface.
Provided by Europlanet
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
3 comments
-
Distance of planets from stars and revolution
1 hour ago
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
1 hour ago |
not rated yet |
8
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
1 hour ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (14) |
39
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Same gene that stunts infants' growth also makes them grow too big: research
UCLA geneticists have identified the mutation responsible for IMAGe* syndrome, a rare disorder that stunts infants' growth. The twist? The mutation occurs on the same gene that causes Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, which makes ...
Scientists develop ultra-sensitive test that detects diseases in their earliest stages
Scientists have developed an ultra-sensitive test that should enable them to detect signs of a disease in its earliest stages, in research published today in the journal Nature Materials.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (3)
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
I'm pretty sure a rail gun would be ideal. Low surface gravity, low escape velocity, and no air resistance.
The way you'd make this work is through massive automation and self-replication.
However, I think it's far cheaper to exhaust the mining options on our own planet, unless the price of some metal in the moon gets so high as to make it worth it.
Supposedly, the moon contains an elevated amount of He3, which is supposed to be useful in fusion, but nobody has even demonstrated economical He3 fusion, so even that is probably useless.
The Alumina, (Al2O3), is probably more valuable for space than titanium, (after baking out the Oxygen,) as it is much, much lighter, and particularly on the Moon and Mars where the gravity is so much lighter.
Aluminum would be the ultimate structural space metal in low gravity.
Al2O3 is the formula for Corundum, which is Saphire, which is incredibly hard. You'd probably need lasers or diamond tools to mine this stuff.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Lunar Escape Velocity is 2.38km/s.
We already have experimental weaponized rail guns capable of firing a projectile at or above that in atmosphere.
There are also hydrogen gas guns capable of similar velocities, but that wouldn't be good on the Moon, since you'd lose all your gas with no good way to replenish it.
Building a Lunar rail gun large enough to launch a cargo capsule would be a very big project, but certainly not impossible. But you'd need mining and refining already in place on the moon to do it. Else, it would cost several TRILLION dollars to build and launch something like that, because it's going to be larger than an aircraft carrier. You'd need to build as much of the structure components as possible from materials already on the Moon, and import special components from Earth; else launch costs from Earth would be impossible.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (2)
Yeah but I wasn't talking about workers, I was talking about getting finished goods to consumers... unless you mean that robots will both be the producers and the consumers... which I suppose is possible, but humans have to get their hands on some final product eventually or no one makes money and so there is no incentive to do it.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
I wouldn't know for sure, but there may be international treaty forbidding anyone from staking a claim on the Moon.
I mean, who gets the "rights" to the resources there?
First come, first served?
If the moon contains some super-exotic isotope in it's deep crust or mantle and someone eventually finds it, would it start a "World War"?
Why shold some CEO or some 3rd or 4th generation decendent of a corporation's founder automatically get part ownership of the Moon, just because they were the first ones to get ther? After all, they inherited the company and the technology, or in some cases are given it by the government. They didn't necessarily build that from the ground up. Why should they get to own and monopolize the Moon?
But I actually agree with you in principle. Once you get a manufacturing facility in space, it's mostly a waste of energy to transport stuff back to Earth, at least above profitability...
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Once you get a manufacturing facility in space you want to use it for making more machines and habitats for human dwelling for space colonization.
Landing a space ship on a planet is a complete waste of energy, except for colonization or insertion of a self-replicating mining system, and even then you wouldn't want to land something large, like a "mothership".
Mostly what you will be doing in space is building self-sufficent space habitats on the Moon, Mars, or artificial orbital platforms of some sort.
I suppose if you eventually tapped Zero Point Energy or wormholes or teleportation or something like that, then we wouldn't care about energy costs, and terraforming a planet would be peanuts too...
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Article 2 of the treaty practically bans anything that would be useful...
Would seem to forbid mining of resources from celestial objects, seeing as how you'd be making a claim by default...
This would also make colonization by anyone except pirates illegal, due to the "by any other means" phrase, since mining and colonization would again require a person to be making a "claim" by default.
People would not move to a place and work there unless they had the right to own something.
Suggests a corporation is subject to the same rules as it's home nation...
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
We know what patent wars look like in existing corporations, can you imagine the espionage, sabotage, and other crap going on if privatized space mining was done?
It's weird though...
Even if it is legal,it'll never be worth it unless something really, really valuable is discovered, or unless we get at least the self-replicating robots anyway.
Does not seem to cover the case of a self-replicating robot.
After all, the "child" was not launched, and is made from components on the celestial body(s) in question.
Our legal system sucks. Congress and presidents signing treaties they have no idea of the consequences...
I guess when this was done nobody took it seriously except for the nuclear weapons part.
Now that we are reaching the pinnacle of technology to make this stuff work, it's important again.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Oct 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
This kind of idea has been proposed and worked out in considerable details for decades. Mass driver concept was hatched mostly to exploit the low escape velocity of the Moon and other low gravity bodies in space for space exploration/space industries. "The Moon is a harsh mistress" by R. A. Heinlein is one well known example of literature on the uses of mass drivers from the Moon.
Oct 08, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Oct 08, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Oct 08, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (4)
Actually,mining doesn't really destroy the environment if it's done responsibly.
Most of the materials we mine (excluding fossil fuels,) are not directly related to life in the modern biosphere.
The real problem comes with irresponsible use and waste of products, i.e. "consumerism" in which we waste and throw away a plastic container which has a 500 year life expectancy, after just one use. This is where we are wasting a huge amoung of materials and destroying the environment.
The plastics pollution in the Pacific comes from illegal dumping in the U.S. and China, from INDIVIDUALS doing it, by throwing their beer bottles and soda bottles and other crap in ditches and streams and so on...
Oct 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Because people design for "form" or for "function" and don't consider economy very often, your house might have a patch of wall 11 ft long, and siding comes in 12ft sections because everything usually comes in even lengths. So you waste 1/12 of the vynl, and in most cases not much of it will be useful anywhere else on the house, except perhaps in the odd case between two close windows or doors. So statistically, the average waste on a piece of building material is one running foot.
All of this gets thrown in landfills or burned or disposed in some other way.
About 10% of the price of a new home or apartment is in this waste, not even counting wastes at the original saw mill, though they capture some of that in particle board...you could cut that value down nearly to half just by making materials at odd lengths, especially plastics and vynls.
Oct 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
The problem with the republican and tea party view is that they claim to be all about "small business", but most 1099 income earners make no more than w2 income earners. They present "small business" as the solution outwardly, but in reality they are all about monopoly of big business.
If everyone is a small business owner, who works for them?
How many gourmet cupcake companies and 3rd party computer repair companies can fit in one town?
YOu want to save America 100 billion, or a trillion per year? I can do that, but you have to get somebody to listen and actually "think" first.
What we have now is everyone goes to work and does their job, and pretty much goes for the "priceline" advertisement gimmick: buy and sell what a celebrity tells you to, whether or not it makes sense and whether or not it's cost effective in the long term, etc.
Quit being cattle first of all, people...
Oct 08, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Oct 08, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
Now the store owners know that the "consumers" need to be able to see things, so they use so much light, but before today, I never gave much thought to just how many lights are there. 520 bulbs.
How is it that "Economics" in America is never "Economical"?
Maybe nothing makes sense to me because nothing makes sense.
It's like the more you waste, the more people are willing to pay for something...
Oct 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
If it says "XX" then the percent sign must be an escape operator in the forum script.
I gave the number 10 percent, and I believe it should be possible to cut it to about 5 just by making more odd sizes in standard building materials, or by architects designing with real world building materials in consideration, instead of the "build it for the looks" mentality they have now.
Oct 08, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
Self-sufficient space habitats - that is the real tech holding things back. We cant do that right now. Transporting consumables is expensive and makes the whole endeavor a huge money drain. -- see ISS.
Oct 08, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
The real problem with the ISS is it's ill conceived.
YOu need huge amounts of energy inputs and resource inputs from the environment in order to be self sufficient. If you have no resource inputs then you need 100 percent recyclability, which requires even more energy inputs.
It was designed as an experiment. A very expensive one at that.
Next time, we need something that can actually pay for itself, which is to say a mining colony.
Oct 09, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Oct 10, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
Perhaps at some point in the far future, an elevator of sorts can be designed that could be tethered to a very long cable that extends up past the ionosphere, attached to a stationary platform in Earth orbit, but in a geosynchronous orbit to the Earth so that the cable can raise and lower the elevator from the platform to carry contents up to the platform and down again with products from the Moon mining operations. Expensive rocket fuel would not be needed except for the trips between the Moon and the platform. And by then, a firm like SpaceX may have discovered a new method of propulsion such as the utilization of concentrated radiation from outer space to heat up whatever they will be using as rocket fuel. Something cheap but efficient.
Oct 10, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Oct 10, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Oct 10, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)