Solar cycle primer

October 28, 2011 by Karen C. Fox

Solar cycle primer

Enlarge

Eleven years in the life of the Sun, spanning most of solar cycle 23, as it progressed from solar minimum (upper left) to maximum conditions and back to minimum (upper right) again, seen as a collage of ten full-disk images of the lower corona. Credit: NASA

(PhysOrg.com) -- Telescopes spotted the first blemish on the sun in 1611. While the sun had long been thought—at least in the Western world—to be an unchanging, "perfect" orb, sky-watchers observed black sunspots on the sun's surface that circled around as with the sun's rotation.

That first crack in the theory of the sun's immutable nature would soon fracture completely as the number of sunspots were shown to increase and decrease over time in a regular, approximately 11-year cycle, called the sunspot cycle. The exact length of the cycle can vary. It has been as short as eight years and as long as fourteen, but the number of sunspots always increases over time, and then returns to low again.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center/Scientific Visualization Studio

More sunspots mean increased solar activity, when great blooms of radiation known as solar flares or bursts of solar material known as coronal mass ejections (CMEs) shoot off the sun's surface. The highest number of spots in any given cycle is designated "solar maximum," while the lowest number is designated "solar minimum." Each cycle varies dramatically in intensity with some solar maxima being so low as to be almost indistinguishable from the preceding minimum.

One such set of cycles famously occurred from 1645 to 1715 and is known as the Maunder Minimum. Those who watched the sun could count enough change in sunspot number that they could still track cycles, but the overall sunspot number dropped drastically. One thirty-year period showed only 30 sunspots, one thousandth of what is typically seen.

The timing of the Maunder Minimum corresponded to what's called the Little Ice Age in Europe—a time of colder weather, heavier snowfall and the freezing of unusually large bodies of water such as the Thames and even the Baltic Sea. The Little Ice Age lasted longer than the Maunder Minimum, and there are other potential causes. Nevertheless it is believed by many scientists that the prolonged solar minima and its corresponding decrease in solar energy cooled Earth. Mapping out the details of how much the change in solar energy could have produced such an effect remains an unresolved area of research.

Solar cycle primer
Enlarge

Early records of sunspots indicate that the Sun went through a period of inactivity in the late 17th century. Very few sunspots were seen on the Sun from about 1645 to 1715. Credit: NASA/MSFC

It was not until the first half of the 20th century that scientists began to understand what causes the sunspot cycle. Researchers determined that the sunspots were a magnetic phenomenon and that, indeed, the entire sun was magnetized with a north and a south magnetic pole just like a bar magnet. The comparison to a simple bar magnet ends there, however, as the sun's interior is constantly on the move.

By tracking sound waves that course through the center of the sun, an area of research known as helioseismology, scientists can gain an understanding of what's deep inside the sun. They have found that the magnetic material inside the sun is constantly stretching, twisting, and crossing as it bubbles up to the surface. The exact pattern of movements is not conclusively mapped out, but over time they eventually lead to the poles reversing completely.

The sunspot cycle happens because of this pole flip — north becomes south and south becomes north—approximately every 11 years. Some 11 years later, the poles reverse again back to where they started, making the full solar cycle actually a 22-year phenomenon. The sun behaves similarly over the course of each 11-year cycle no matter which pole is on top, however, so this shorter cycle tends to receive more attention.

The sun is currently ramping up once again to solar maximum, so flares and CMEs are more common than they were a few years ago. This cycle may peak in late 2013, or early 2014, and should reach a minimum around 2020—although predictions about the sun's cycle are still quite uncertain. This has been the slowest of the space age, which is the time frame during which we have the most detailed observations.

The slower-than-expected progress of this cycle has led some researchers to speculate that the next cycle might be even smaller, with few sunspots even at solar maximum. It is still far too early to know, but even if this is the case, it has happened before and isn't a cause for concern. Four hundred years of sunspot observations have shown that the cycle will always return.

More information: For more about sunspots, visit: http://solarscienc … tCycle.shtml

Provided by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center search and more info website

4.1 /5 (10 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

ryggesogn2
Oct 28, 2011

Rank: 2.8 / 5 (11)
But solar cycles have no effect upon 'global climate change'.
nejc2008
Oct 28, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Well, here we have one who KNOWS! Congratulations.
omatumr
Oct 28, 2011

Rank: 1.4 / 5 (9)
Thank you for this reminder on the natural variability of Earth's heat source - the Sun.

Several studies reported that the cycles are induced by solar wobble from gravitational interactions between orbiting planets and the solar core (1-4).

That is why we need to know if the solar core is an iron-encased pulsar (5).

1. P. D. Jose, Suns motion and sunspots, Astron. J., 1965, 70, 193-200

2. R. W. Fairbridge and J. H. Shirley, Prolonged minima and the 179-yr cycle of the solar
inertial motion, Solar Physics, 1987, 110, 191-220

3. Superfluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate, Journal of Fusion Energy, 2002, 21, 193-198 http://arxiv.org/.../0501441

4. "Earth's Heat Source- The Sun," E&E, 2009, 20, 131-144 http://arxiv.org/pdf/0905.0704

5. "Neutron Repulsion", The APEIRON Journal, in press (2011)

http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://myprofile....anuelo09

Callippo
Oct 28, 2011

Rank: 2 / 5 (5)
But solar cycles have no effect upon 'global climate change'.

The eleven years cycles not, but the minimum of solar activity do - the so called Maunder minimum as apparent connection to the medieval era of cold winters.

http://en.wikiped...bers.png

But the people are surprisingly ignorant to explanations of both climatic cycles, both solar cycles. For example, the eleven years standing period of Solar activity has a connection to the motion of Jupiter planet - but from some reason no one of mainstream physics analyzed this connection deeper. Although this connection is quite apparent, from some reason the publications about it never got into peer-reviewed journals and the people who are dealing with this periodicity are generaly considered crackpots.

This illustrates clearly, the contemporary implementation of science still suffers with deep flaws.
omatumr
Oct 28, 2011

Rank: 1.4 / 5 (11)
the so called Maunder minimum as apparent connection to the medieval era of cold winters.

http://en.wikiped...bers.png

the eleven years standing period of Solar activity has a connection to the motion of Jupiter planet - but from some reason no one of mainstream physics analyzed this connection deeper.


Government science was misdirected after 1971 to support the Bilderberg model of the Sun as a stable heat source "in equilibrium".

Conflicting observations, even from very talented astrophysicists like Dr. Carl A. Rouse [1, 2], were ignored.

[1] Dr. Carl A. Rouse (PhD, Cal Tech)
www.omatumr.com/P...desc.htm

[2] "Evidence for a small, high-Z, iron-like solar core," Astronomy & Astrophysics 149, 65-72 (1985):

http://articles.a...49...65R

omatumr
Oct 28, 2011

Rank: 1.4 / 5 (11)
Carl A. Rouse earned his PhD in particle physics at Cal Tech in 1956.

"A researcher at heart who avoided the classroom, while working in private industry he branched out into astrophysics and in his writings and lectures challenged mistaken hypotheses concerning intensely hot gases that constitute the sun and stars."

www.math.buffalo....rla.html
Callippo
Oct 28, 2011

Rank: 2.2 / 5 (10)
omatumr: The posts of yours aren't related to sun cycles in any logical way presented. You're just abusing the visitors of this discussion instead of your children, but from the same reason: you're living in the world of your fantazies.
omatumr
Oct 28, 2011

Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
I failed to explain that solar cycles occur BECAUSE changes in SIM (solar inertial motion) cause the Sun's dense energetic core to be jerked around - like a yo-yo on a string - inside the glowing ball of waste products (photosphere = 91% H 9% He) that obscures the solar core.
omatumr
Oct 28, 2011

Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
I failed to mention that solar cycles occur BECAUSE changes in SIM (solar inertial motion) cause the Sun's dense energetic solar core to be jerked around - like a yo-yo on a string - inside the glowing ball of waste products (photosphere = 91% H 9% He) that obscures the solar core.
Callippo
Oct 28, 2011

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
I failed to explain that solar cycles occur BECAUSE changes in SIM (solar inertial motion) cause the Sun's dense energetic core to be jerked around - like a yo-yo on a string - inside the glowing ball of waste products

This effect has nothing to do with Sun composition, as it can occur even in classical models of solar fusion, which are considering the existence of dense solar core too. So that all your links above are irelevant to subject.
omatumr
Oct 28, 2011

Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
Do you really think that the position of the compact, dense solar core remains fixed in the exact center of the Sun during changes in solar inertial motion?

Are you aware of an instrument called a "shaker" ? It is used to mix paint.
Callippo
Oct 28, 2011

Rank: 2.5 / 5 (8)
Of course, the dense solar core exists in standard solar model too. We don't need any omaturm to realize it.

http://en.wikiped...ar_Model

As I explained here many times, the motion of solar core is affected with position of the center of mass of solar system, which is driven with motion of Jupiter and other planets. It affects the convection of solar plasma with Coriollis effect.

Again, it has anything to do with your silly links and it could be deduced from any solar model.
omatumr
Oct 28, 2011

Rank: 1.4 / 5 (10)
Of course the dense solar core exists in standard solar model too.


Shaking [changes in SIM - solar inertial motion] causes mixing of material with different densities

The Sun's pulsar core is much more dense than ordinary atomic matter.

That is why the pulsar-centered Sun explains better than the standard solar model:

a) Solar cycles and many other observations that lock-step consensus scientists ignored for the past four decades (b,c,d,e,f,):

b) "Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate"
J Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)

http://arxiv.org/.../0501441

c) "Composition of the solar interior" ESA SP-517, 345-348 (2003)

http://arxiv.org/...410717v1

d) "Earth's Heat Source - The Sun", E & E 20, 131-144 (2009)

http://arxiv.org/pdf/0905.0704

e) "Neutron repulsion" (in press)

http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1

f) Climategate history (1971-2011)
http://dl.dropbox...oots.pdf
hyongx
Oct 28, 2011

Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
I like this article, because I learned something new, that I didn't know, about sun-spot cycles. Theoretical models speculate, while experimental observations provide information to support or discredit theoretical models. Science proceeds as per usual.
Mr. Oliver, your posts are, as per usual, entertaining and mostly irrelevant. :)
jsdarkdestruction
Oct 29, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
i love it when those 2 go at it. Callipo, you are actually the most sane person in the argument. After reading through your past 20 posts i was getting kind of sick of it but these made me smile. i think you should do that with all of olivers post. it would make the world a better place for us all.
Callippo
Oct 29, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
i think you should do that with all of olivers post
It has no meaning to dispute with him. He will just repeat his usual list of links prepared for clipboard paste.
jsdarkdestruction
Oct 29, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
but it makes you look so much better than your normal posting does....look at that, you just got a bunch of five scores(by me), whens the last time that happened?(answer=last time you called olivers nonsense out.)
Callippo
Oct 29, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
This is not a social club and I'm not here for collection of credits. You should use a PM feature for such kind of messages. If you don't want to see the very same links all the time, just report the abuse. Or you're just helping the spammers to attract attention to their person.
barakn
Oct 29, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
...changes in SIM (solar inertial motion) cause the Sun's dense energetic core to be jerked around - like a yo-yo on a string ....
The Sun does indeed orbit around the barycenter of the solar system, but it does so in free-fall, simply following a straight line in curved spacetime. This is similar to an stronaut orbiting the Earth, who's linear inertial motion has been constrained into an ellipse by gravity but who feels weightless. If anything is going to jerk the Sun's core relative to outer layers it is the gravity gradient, or tidal forces, and analysis of the primary motion around the barycenter will tell you little about the tidal forces.
andre_5200
Oct 29, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Have we forgotten about frequencies, and or, metaphysics, they too doctrine our minute planes?
Egnite
Oct 31, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
..isn't a cause for concern. Four hundred years of sunspot observations have shown that the cycle will always return.


Yeah, monitoring a 4.6 bilion year old star for 400 years will give you a great indication of any patterns that could exist. Arrogant much?
omatumr
Oct 31, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
The Sun does indeed orbit around the barycenter of the solar system, but it does so in free-fall, simply following a straight line in curved space-time.


The link of solar inertial motion with Earth's climate, solar cycles and sunspots was known even before we realized the solar core is a pulsar, about 1,000,000,000,000,000 more dense than ordinary atomic matter.

See the review paper by Richard Mackey, "Rhodes Fairbridge and the idea that the solar system regulates the Earths climate"

www.griffith.edu....S176.pdf

Two of many earlier papers:

1. J. D. Jose, Suns motion and sunspots, Astron. J. 70, 193-200 (1965)

2. R. W. Fairbridge and J. H. Shirley, Prolonged minima and the 179-yr cycle of the solar
inertial motion, Solar Physics 110, 191-220 (1987)

Rank 4.1 /5 (10 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Distance of planets from stars and revolution
    created1 hour ago
  • revamping general concept and cosmological principle
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Math behind Theoretical Physics
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Structure of the Milky Way?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy

Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...

Space & Earth / Environment

created 1 hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 8 | with audio podcast

10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction

It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 1 hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 1 | with audio podcast

Sophisticated simulations predict future warming

The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (9) | comments 51

Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director

Alien life probably isn’t interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (14) | comments 39

Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue

UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.

Space & Earth / Environment

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 3.7 / 5 (7) | comments 39


'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Same gene that stunts infants' growth also makes them grow too big: research

UCLA geneticists have identified the mutation responsible for IMAGe* syndrome, a rare disorder that stunts infants' growth. The twist? The mutation occurs on the same gene that causes Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, which makes ...

Scientists develop ultra-sensitive test that detects diseases in their earliest stages

Scientists have developed an ultra-sensitive test that should enable them to detect signs of a disease in its earliest stages, in research published today in the journal Nature Materials.