Solar systems: Energy from sun can pay for panels in about 10 years

Oct 06, 2011 By Kathy Van Mullekom

Ben Cuker lives what he teaches as a professor of marine and environmental science at Hampton University in Hampton, Va.

Max Buzard lives what he sells and installs through Royer Technical Services, also in Hampton.

Both are enthusiasts, living in houses that make the energy they use. Instead of just paying , they can get checks back from brokers and the power company.

"Photovoltaic actually start paying for themselves right after installation," says Buzard. He estimates 10 solar panels in 235-watt sizes cost about $14,000 installed; add in a 30 percent federal credit, register for renewable energy credits and you pay for the system in less than 10 years.

"Our home has 25 solar panels of various sizes. We went from $225 per month on the budget plan to $70 a month - a savings of $155. In addition, we receive solar payments of $200 per megawatt generated. Last quarter, we received $400."

For the Cukers, the savings and payback are just as great.

"Dominion (Dominion Power Co. in Virginia) charges us about $8.25 a month for staying tied to the , so we spend just under $100 per year on our electric bill," says Cuker, who shares the house with wife, Dawn.

"However, even though we use almost all the energy we make, we sell the credits for the renewable energy on the SREC (Solar Renewable Energy Credit) market. Since installing the first systems in 2009, we have made $1,940, which leaves us about $800 to the good each year, after subtracting what we pay Dominion."

SRECS are a way for utilities to buy the clean energy produced by anybody who makes solar energy and is tied to the grid, according to Cuker.

"Even though the homeowner uses most of the energy produced, the fact that it was done without burning dirty fuels is what is traded," he says.

"Current rates for SRECs are about $200 per megawatt."

Buzard's solar lifestyle includes a 33-foot-tall wind turbine that spins with the breezes at his waterfront home. But, he's not sold on wind turbines for individual homeowners.

"The bang for the buck just isn't there," says Buzard, 54. "I only get wind from 180 degrees because homes in the neighborhood block it at this height.

"For homeowners, solar panels are the way to go."

Buzard's solar panels are small, attractive units he installed on short poles camouflaged by shrubbery. Some are located on the roof of his boathouse. Microinverters attached to the panels convert the to power the house can use. The number of solar panels a house needs is based on its energy use, so cost varies from house to house. Typically, a turnkey installation with ten 235-watt solar panels runs about $14,000; add in a 30 percent federal tax credit and your cost is about $10,500, said Buzard.

Cuker, 57, wholeheartedly agrees about the solar panels, but he's taken it a step further, making some innovations on his own.

Living in their 1936-built house since 1988, Cuker wanted to showcase how an old house, not just a new house, can become near energy neutral, meaning it generates at least as much energy as it uses.

In 2009, he worked with Solar Services of Virginia Beach, Va., to install solar cells. Encountering a problem because the roof on the main structure has a roof line with east-west slopes, and not the desired southern slope, he designed and built a five-part solar awning on the south side to carry the solar panels. Each awning section supports two 215-watt panels, for a total of 10.

"We adjust the slope of the awning with the changing seasons to get the best angle on the sun and maximize production of electricity," he says.

The first year, the Cuker household made about 60 percent of their electricity needs. In 2010, Solar Services installed 10 additional panels on the east-facing roof of an addition on the house. Combined, the solar panels produce about 100 percent of the home's electricity needs now, including air conditioning for summer.

In addition, the Cukers installed a solar hot water system. He also designed, built and installed a 20-foot-long "solar heat wall," using acrylic panels that heat a back room; it costs about $500 in materials. A fourth system is a solar-powered attic ventilator he created with two small solar panels and two engine cooling fans for less than $200.

The Cukers' cost for all this solar is offset by a 30 percent federal tax credit for the $38,000 spent on the photovoltaic system, meaning it cost them about $26,600. The solar hot water system, which cost just under $7,000, also got the 30 percent credit, as well as $4,000 from a special Virginia fund that encourages clean energy, helping the hot water system pay for itself within a year, according to Cuker.

During winter, the Cukers heat the house with a ventless natural gas log fireplace for about $250 for the season; they save about $30 per month by having the gas service stopped in April and restarted in November.

"The electrical system is tied to the grid," says Cuker. "So we don't store the energy we make, but share it with the Dominion system of distribution."

Which means the house has a "net meter" installed on an exterior wall.

"It's one that counts backward when we make more than we use," says Cuker.

Explore further: Imec demonstrates organic photovoltaics modules showing excellent optical properties, high efficiencies

2.3 /5 (3 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Californians bask in solar energy

Jan 04, 2007

Soaring energy costs, environmental consciousness and financial incentives have combined to make solar panels part of the California housing landscape.

A flexible way to use sun's rays

Sep 02, 2011

Carl Harberger's 6,000-square-foot house in the Chatsworth neighborhood of Los Angeles is equipped with six refrigerators, five TVs, a smattering of computers and a pool, among other things - enough to draw the wagging finger ...

Solar panels released in an array of colors

Jun 07, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Solar panels are, for the most part, large black panels, made of squares, but what if it does not have to be that way. What if users could get all of the benefits of solar panels without ...

Solar panels keep buildings cool

Jul 18, 2011

Those solar panels on top of your roof aren't just providing clean power; they are cooling your house, or your workplace, too, according to a team of researchers led by Jan Kleissl, a professor of environmental ...

One million Bangladesh homes on solar power

Jun 15, 2011

The number of households in electricity-starved Bangladesh using solar panels has crossed the one million mark -- the fastest expansion of solar use in the world, officials said Wednesday.

Recommended for you

Yale engineer to build 'hot' solar cells

15 hours ago

Associate professor of electrical engineering Minjoo Larry Lee has been awarded $2,540,000 to develop dual-junction solar cells that can operate efficiently at extreme temperatures above 750 degrees Fahrenheit. ...

Fracking's environmental impacts scrutinised

16 hours ago

(Phys.org) —Greenhouse gas emissions from the production and use of shale gas would be comparable to conventional natural gas, but the controversial energy source actually faired better than renewables on some environmental ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jonnyboy
2.5 / 5 (8) Oct 06, 2011
10 years, only because the rest of us are picking up half the tab through federal state local etc. credits.
that_guy
not rated yet Oct 06, 2011
I don't think that most people are savvy enough to sell on the carbon market, although, in a way, I believe a carbon credit contract should be included. (Outside the fact that carbon credits have turned into a joke)

I'm not sure how much service this does for people, other than to say you should sell your carbon credits if you can, because once you take that out of the equation, the numbers look really different. Most people want a system that doesn't require them to be day traders.

For one, a $4000 hot water system would take me 7-10 years to earn its keep. The solar system would break even at about 15 years, which is iffy considering degradation/lifetime of the panels.

This article should focus on selling the carbon credits, and outlining the fact that solar panels have an advantage that there is no markup on the energy generated - practical stuff that your average person would be interested in.
dirk_bruere
not rated yet Oct 07, 2011
"He estimates 10 solar panels in 235-watt sizes cost about $14,000 installed;"

Since the panels themselves probably cost around $4000 somebody is making a lot of profit somewhere
that_guy
not rated yet Oct 07, 2011
Several people/companies are, but I think you're discounting the DC/AC converter, frame, other related equipment, and installation costs.

And 'probably' indicates that your information might not be accurate - Although I wouldn't be surprised if it was in the ballpark.

It would be cool if they sold solar kits so that people could save on the installation costs (I would still have an electrician make the final hookup though.)
barakn
5 / 5 (1) Oct 20, 2011
10 years, only because the rest of us are picking up half the tab through federal state local etc. credits.

And yet you don't seem to have a problem with taxpayers footing the bill for all those oil wars. Hypocritical much?