Bringing satellites out of retirement -The DARPA Phoenix program

October 25, 2011 by Tammy Plotner, Universe Today

Bringing satellites out of retirement -The DARPA phoenix program

Enlarge

Artist's Concept of Phoenix Mission - Credit: DARPA

It’s the dead zone. Approximately 22,000 miles above the Earth, $300 million worth of retired satellites are simply taking up space in geosynchronous orbit. Like anything a bit elderly, they might have problems, but they’re far from useless. There are a hundred willing volunteers waiting to be retrofitted, and all they need is the wave of a magic wand to come back to life. The DARPA Phoenix program might just be the answer.

Communication satellites in geosynchronous orbit (GEO) enable vital interchanges between warfighters. When one fails, it means an expensive replacement. But what remains isn’t a burned-out shell – it’s still a viable piece of equipment which often contains still usable antennae, solar arrays and other components. The only problem is that we haven’t figured out a way to recycle them. Now DARPA’s Phoenix program is offering an answer by developing the technology necessary to “harvest” these non-working satellites and their working parts. “If this program is successful, space debris becomes space resource,” said DARPA Director, Regina E. Dugan.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

However, as easy as the idea might sound, it’s going to take a lot of cooperation from a variety of applied sciences. For example, incorporating the robotics which allows a doctor to perform telesurgery from a remote location to the advanced remote imaging systems used for offshore drilling which views the ocean floor thousands of feet underwater. If this technology could be re-engineered to work at zero gravity, high-vacuum and under an intense radiation environment, it’s entirely possible to re-purpose retired GEO satellites.

“Satellites in GEO are not designed to be disassembled or repaired, so it’s not a matter of simply removing some nuts and bolts,” said David Barnhart, DARPA program manager. “This requires new remote imaging and robotics technology and special tools to grip, cut, and modify complex systems, since existing joints are usually molded or welded. Another challenge is developing new remote operating procedures to hold two parts together so a third robotic ‘hand’ can join them with a third part, such as a fastener, all in zero gravity. For a person operating such robotics, the complexity is similar to trying to assemble via remote control multiple Legos at the same time while looking through a telescope.”

Now enter DARPA’s System F6 – the master . It will host affordable, smaller scale electronics and structural models that provide on-board control. These smaller units will be able to communicate with each other and the master satellite – working together to harness the potential of the retired satellite’s assets. Right now, the Phoenix program is looking for the automation technology for creating a new breed of “satlets,” or nanosatellites. These can be sent into space much more economically through existing commercial satellite launches and then robotically attached to the elderly satellites to create new systems.

Bringing satellites out of retirement -The DARPA phoenix program
Enlarge

Artist Concept of System F6 - Credit: DARPA

System F6 (Future, Fast, Flexible, Fractionated, Free-Flying Spacecraft United by Information Exchange) will be fascinating in itself… a hive of wirelessly-interconnected modules capable of communicating with each other – sharing resources among themselves and utilizing resources found elsewhere within the cluster. “The program is predicated on the development of open interface standards—from the physical wireless link layer through the network protocol stack, including the real-time resource sharing middleware and cluster flight logic—to enable the emergence of a space “global commons” which would enhance the mutual security posture of all participants through interdependence.” says the DARPA team. “A key program goal is the industry-wide promulgation of these open interface standards for the sustainment and development of future fractionated systems.”

Right now the Phoenix program is looking for high tech expertise needed to develop a payload orbital delivery system. The PODS units will be needed to safely house the satlets during launch. The next step is an independent servicing station which will be placed in GEO and connected to PODS. The service module will be home to equipment such as mechanical arms and remote vision systems… the virtual “operating” center to make the Phoenix program a success.

Source: Universe Today

4.8 /5 (6 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

dschlink
Oct 25, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
In many cases, end-of-life is due to the lack of propellant for the stabilizing system. Rather than attempting to refill systems it might be simpler to attach a new auxiliary system with easily recharged tanks.
210
Oct 25, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
In many cases, end-of-life is due to the lack of propellant for the stabilizing system. Rather than attempting to refill systems it might be simpler to attach a new auxiliary system with easily recharged tanks.
I agree: The problems are truly daunting however -1) The cost of launch for the new fuel tanks. 2) U need the 'service' vehicle to service more than one satellite 2 start recovering costs. 3) To get to TWO satellites means a serious orbital burn, the service craft must be HUGE for this manuever - must make many, many burns. 4) A craft Dis big would need 2 B immune 2 space debris/trash/junk - not possible. 5) Another space station 4 servce of ded satellites is wht needed - D cost!
6) Sats go ded fast due 2 numbr N orbit, have 2 launch anothr ship/station - D cost!
7) Nations N space will not unite 2 fund launch or cleanup/rennovation. Finally, nothing put in space is cheap if worth saving - spare parts and fuel also have shelf life.
Need a new kind of satellite!
word-
Feldagast
Oct 25, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
Too bad we don't have a launchable vehicle with the capability of capturing these satellites and a platform that can maintain some duration in space. Oh wait we did and we retired it.
RustyMustard
Oct 25, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
Too bad we don't have a launchable vehicle with the capability of capturing these satellites and a platform that can maintain some duration in space. Oh wait we did and we retired it.


What vehicle would that be? What do/did we have that can do it at 22,500 miles?
ettinone
Oct 25, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Too bad we don't have a launchable vehicle with the capability of capturing these satellites and a platform that can maintain some duration in space. Oh wait we did and we retired it.


As Rusty already pointed out the Space Shuttle was designed for Low Earth Orbit (between 278km to 450km). Geosynchronous satellites operate at approximately 35,700km. Big difference and something you should have researched before making a silly statement like that.
huntingsthompson
Oct 25, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
So say for example Space X is able to deliver cargo to the space station. Could the ISS be used as a staging area for missions to Geosynchronous Orbit or would it be easier/more cost effective to do it from the ground-on-up?
210
Oct 26, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
So say for example Space X is able to deliver cargo to the space station. Could the ISS be used as a staging area for missions to Geosynchronous Orbit or would it be easier/more cost effective to do it from the ground-on-up?

Lifting the raw materials to the ISS raises their cost.Not their value. We would need the 'services' provided by such a 'satellite' to be very expensive when done by any other means. We need the raw materials, the launch platform and the destination(s) to Stay in space. We need to make the moon our orbiting satellite manufacturing point. It provides the raw materials, a far lower(steam powered) cost to launch, and we can automate the entire process and the moon and the satellites, stay in space. When the satellites finally die, we can use small thrusters 'thrown' from the moon to push - using compressed air- old satellites into the atmosphere for burn up. No, the Chinese are right, the moon IS the best place to turn into a 'space station.
word-to-ya-muthas
Rank 4.8 /5 (6 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Distance of planets from stars and revolution
    created2 hours ago
  • revamping general concept and cosmological principle
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Math behind Theoretical Physics
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Structure of the Milky Way?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study

(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.

Space & Earth / Environment

created 55 minutes ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 1 | with audio podcast

Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy

Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...

Space & Earth / Environment

created 2 hours ago | popularity 4 / 5 (1) | comments 10 | with audio podcast

10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction

It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 2 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 1 | with audio podcast

Sophisticated simulations predict future warming

The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (9) | comments 51

Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director

Alien life probably isn’t interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (14) | comments 39


Almost half of new vets seek disability

(AP) -- America's newest veterans are filing for disability benefits at a historic rate, claiming to be the most medically and mentally troubled generation of former troops the nation has ever seen.

'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...