Population growth set to significantly affect ecosystem services

Oct 10, 2011

Changing land use can have a significant impact on a region’s vital ecosystem services, a recent research study has revealed.

Large increases in urbanization can lead to more concrete and asphalt reducing an area’s flood mitigation services.

Low density housing, however, has little effect on flood mitigation services but does cut down losses in the amount of land available for food and carbon storage, the study showed.

Researchers investigated how a projected 16 per cent increase in the human population in Britain by 2031 would affect key ecosystem services depending on how cities expanded to meet the growing demand.

Dr. Felix Eigenbrod, Lecturer in Ecology and Ecosystem Services at the University of Southampton, led the study while at the University of Sheffield.

He says: “Predicting exactly how cities are going to grow is extremely difficult because every city grows a bit differently, so we decided to analyse the impacts of two extreme, yet realistic scenarios – densification and suburban sprawl on three ecosystem services.

“We assumed under the sprawl scenario that the majority of would be accommodated by building new suburban housing.

“Under the densification scenario we assumed that in the first instance areas with suburban levels of housing would become dense urban housing. This would greatly reduce the amount of new land needed for housing,” he says.

The study team, from the University of Sheffield and the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, in Wallingford, explored the effect of these two different scenarios on three – flood mitigation, agricultural production and carbon storage.

Felix says: “If a city expands then that land is no longer useful for agriculture so production goes down and when you construct new houses you disturb the soil, which removes the stored carbon.

“However, if you reduce expansion of cities by increasing high density housing, you tend to have much less green space so the water will run off quicker and contribute to flooding, whereas in suburban areas there will be a lot of gardens and parks where the water can drain into the soil and not create floods.”

“There is an opportunity here, with clever planning, to try and maximise the benefits identified from both scenarios,” Felix adds.

The results of the study were presented at the British Ecological Society’s (BES) annual meeting at the University of Sheffield and are published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences.

Explore further: Gold rush an ecological disaster for Peruvian Amazon

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The grass is always greener

Aug 19, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Recent study of grasslands shows that species variety more important to ecosystem services than previously thought.

In soil we trust

Jul 14, 2011

Put simply, we cannot survive without soil. Its rich combination of minerals, carbon-rich organic matter and water supports plant life. It also harbours its own diverse ecosystem of millions of microbes and ...

Recommended for you

Gold rush an ecological disaster for Peruvian Amazon

22 hours ago

A lush expanse of Amazon rainforest known as the "Mother of God" is steadily being destroyed in Peru, with the jungle giving way to mercury-filled tailing ponds used to extract the gold hidden underground.

Australia out of step with new climate momentum

Nov 28, 2014

Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who rose to power in large part by opposing a tax on greenhouse gas emissions, is finding his country isolated like never before on climate change as the U.S., China ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Nanobanano
1 / 5 (2) Oct 10, 2011
how a projected 16 per cent increase in the human population in Britain by 2031


My God. How can the population growth be that high?

Ok, U.S. population growth was 9.7 percent, but that wasn't through reproduction. Our reproduction rate is not even enough to replace existing population. The growth came through imigration, much of which was illegal.

Which has become part of the U.S. problem. Our country is divided and is too diverse, and nobody ever agrees on anything, so nothing ever works out.

*ahem* digression...

Does Britain have THAT much immigration?

Is nanotechnology and other modern medicine really expected to make life expectancy that much higher to support an 8 percent per decade growth rate for 20 years? I doubt people are having that many children, how would they support them in the modern economy and modern life style?
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (4) Oct 10, 2011
A popular new feature in Tucson, AZ is to dig a big hole in your yard and add a cistern to collect some of the rain water that rushes down the washes.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.