Planets smashed into dust near supermassive black holes

Oct 28, 2011
Caption: A 2006 Hubble Space Telescope image of the "light echo" of dust illuminated by the nearby star V838 Monocerotis that became 600,000 times more luminous than our Sun in January 2002. This outburst is believed to have been caused by a giant collision of some kind, e.g., between two stars or a star and a planet. Credit: NASA/ESA. Collsions of smaller objects, such as asteroids or minor planets near a supermassive black hole could also be dramatic due to the huge collision velocities and would release a lot of dust." Credit: NASA/ESA.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Fat doughnut-shaped dust shrouds that obscure about half of supermassive black holes could be the result of high speed crashes between planets and asteroids, according to a new theory from an international team of astronomers. The scientists, led by Dr. Sergei Nayakshin of the University of Leicester, publish their results in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Supermassive black holes reside in the central parts of most galaxies. Observations indicate that about 50% of them are hidden from view by mysterious , the origin of which is not completely understood. The new theory is inspired by our own Solar System, where the so-called zodiacal dust is known to originate from collisions between solid bodies such as asteroids and comets. The scientists propose that the central regions of galaxies contain not only black holes and stars but also planets and asteroids.

Collisions between these rocky objects would occur at colossal speeds as large as 1000 km per second, continuously shattering and fragmenting the objects, until eventually they end up as . Dr. Nayakshin points out that this - radiation and frequent collisions - would make the planets orbiting supermassive black holes sterile, even before they are destroyed. "Too bad for life on these planets", he says, "but on the other hand the dust created in this way blocks much of the harmful radiation from reaching the rest of the . This in turn may make it easier for life to prosper elsewhere in the rest of the central region of the galaxy."

He also believes that understanding the origin of the dust near black holes is important in our models of how these monsters grow and how exactly they affect their host galaxies. "We suspect that the in our own Galaxy, the Milky Way, expelled most of the gas that would otherwise turn into more stars and planets", he continues, "Understanding the origin of the dust in the inner regions of galaxies would take us one step closer to solving the mystery of the supermassive black holes".

Explore further: Astronomers find 'cousin' planets around twin stars

More information: The new work is published in "Are SMBHs shrouded by "Super-Oort" clouds of comets and asteroids?", Nayakshin S., et al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, in press. A preprint of the paper can be seen at arxiv.org/abs/1109.1217

Related Stories

Supermassive black hole is thrown out of galaxy

May 11, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Undergraduate student Marianne Heida of the University of Utrecht has found what appears to be a supermassive black hole leaving its home galaxy at high speed. As part of an international ...

Chandra finds nearest pair of supermassive black holes

Aug 31, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Astronomers have used NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory to discover the first pair of supermassive black holes in a spiral galaxy similar to the Milky Way. At a distance of 160 million light ...

Black holes spinning faster than ever before

May 23, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Two UK astronomers have found that the giant black holes in the centre of galaxies are on average spinning faster than at any time in the history of the Universe. Dr Alejo Martinez-Sansigre ...

Chandra data reveal rapidly whirling black holes

Jan 10, 2008

A new study using results from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory provides one of the best pieces of evidence yet that many supermassive black holes are spinning extremely rapidly. The whirling of these giant ...

Backwards Black Holes Might Make Bigger Jets

Jun 01, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Going against the grain may turn out to be a powerful move for black holes. New research suggests supermassive black holes that spin backwards might produce more ferocious jets of gas. The ...

Recommended for you

How small can galaxies be?

Sep 29, 2014

Yesterday I talked about just how small a star can be, so today let's explore just how small a galaxy can be. Our Milky Way galaxy is about 100,000 light years across, and contains about 200 billion stars. Th ...

The coolest stars

Sep 29, 2014

One way that stars are categorized is by temperature. Since the temperature of a star can determine its visual color, this category scheme is known as spectral type. The main categories of spectral type are ...

Simulations reveal an unusual death for ancient stars

Sep 29, 2014

(Phys.org) —Certain primordial stars—those 55,000 and 56,000 times the mass of our Sun, or solar masses—may have died unusually. In death, these objects—among the Universe's first-generation of stars—would ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

omatumr
1 / 5 (7) Oct 28, 2011
Planets smashed into dust near supermassive black holes?


Or planets form out of dust near "supermassive black holes"?

The first planets observed beyond the solar system were planets that formed out of the supernova debris surrounding a pulsar [1]. That 1992 discovery has been confirmed in many subsequent studies at Pennsylvania State University and Poland's Nicolaus Copernicus University [2,3]:

1. www.nature.com/na...5a0.html

2. http://live.psu.e...ry/56029

3. www.physorg.com/n...lar.html

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Burnerjack
1 / 5 (3) Oct 28, 2011
"Could" occurs more often in this article than "good science" would allow.
Supposition is a poor alternative for information. Fishing for funding?
jsdarkdestruction
5 / 5 (4) Oct 29, 2011
a pulsar is not a supermassive black hole. a pulsar could never get that big. it would collapse, just like your theory does when you try to say neutron repulsion stops black holes from forming and causes the expansion of the universe when it would also stop pulsars from forming.
hush1
not rated yet Oct 31, 2011
lol
Burnerjack
"Could" occurs more often in this article than "good science" would allow.


Would it now? Oh my! What a poor question in search for alternatives to supposition! Occurs much too often!

Pokin fun.
hush1
not rated yet Oct 31, 2011
lol Burnerjack
Scrutinize jsdarkdestruction:
"could never", "it would collapse", "when it would".

We could or would or should never allow this!
Where would! we be without are poor alternatives for information or suppositionals?

Gone fishin...

hush1
not rated yet Oct 31, 2011
typo:
are=our
Obviously an failed attempt at spelling.
I would or could or should be much better off with suppositions.