Physicists unveil a theory for a new kind of superconductivity

Oct 24, 2011
The superfow of two kinds of superconducting electrons (arrows show their velocities) as calculated on supercomputers. Graphic 2 shows superflow of the other subpopulation of electrons on the surface of a vortex cluster. Graphics courtesy of Egor Babaev.

( -- In this 100th anniversary year of the discovery of superconductivity, physicists at the University of Massachusetts Amherst and Sweden’s Royal Institute of Technology have published a fully self-consistent theory of the new kind of superconducting behavior, Type 1.5, this month in the journal Physical Review B.

In three recent papers, the authors report on their detailed investigations to show that a Type 1.5 superconducting state is indeed possible in a class of materials called multiband superconductors.

For years, most believed that superconductors must be either Type I or Type II. Type 1.5 superconductivity is the subject of intense debate because until now there was no theory to connect the physics with micro-scale properties of real materials, say Egor Babaev of UMass Amherst, currently a fellow at the technology institute in Stockholm, with Mikhail Silaev, a postdoctoral researcher there.

Their new papers now provide a theoretical framework to allow scientists to calculate conditions necessary for the appearance of Type 1.5 superconductivity, which exhibits characteristics of Types I and II previously thought to be antagonistic.

Superconductivity is a state where electric charge flows without resistance. In Type I and Type II, charge flow patterns are dramatically different. Type I, discovered in 1911, has two state-defining properties: Lack of electric resistance and the fact that it does not allow an external to pass through it. When a magnetic field is applied to these materials, superconducting electrons produce a strong current on the surface which in turn produces a magnetic field in the opposite direction. Inside this type of superconductor, the external magnetic field and the field created by the surface flow of electrons add up to zero. That is, they cancel each other out.

Type II superconductivity was predicted to exist by a Russian theoretical physicist who said there should be where a complicated flow of superconducting electrons can happen deep in the interior. In Type II material, a magnetic field can gradually penetrate, carried by vortices like tiny electronic tornadoes, Babaev explains. The combined works that theoretically described Type I and II superconductivity won the Nobel Prize in 2003.

The superfow of two kinds of superconducting electrons (arrows show their velocities) as calculated on supercomputers. Graphic 1 shows the first kind of supercurrent forming vortices. Graphics courtesy of Egor Babaev

Classifying superconductors in this way turned out to be very robust: All superconducting materials discovered in the last half-century can be classified as either, Babaev says. But he believed a state must exist that does not fall into either camp: Type 1.5. By working out the theoretical bases for superconducting materials, he had predicted that in some materials, superconducting electrons could be classed as two competing types or subpopulations, one behaving like electrons in Type I material, the other behaving like electrons in a Type II material.

Babaev also said that Type 1.5 superconductors should form something like a super-regular Swiss cheese, with clusters of tightly packed vortex droplets of two kinds of electron: one type bunched together and a second type flowing on the surface of vortex clusters in a way similar to how electrons flow on the exterior of Type I superconductors. These vortex clusters are separated by "voids," with no vortices, no currents and no magnetic field.

The major objection raised by skeptics, he recalls, is that fundamentally there is only one kind of electron, so it’s difficult to accept that two types of superconducting electron populations could exist with such dramatically different behaviors.

To answer this, Silaev and Babaev developed their theory to explain how real materials can give raise to Type-1.5 superconductivity, taking into account interactions at microscales. In a parallel effort, their colleagues at UMass Amherst and in Sweden including Johan Carlstrom and Julien Garaud, with Babaev, used supercomputers to perform large-scale numerical calculations modeling the behavior of superconducting electrons to better understand the structure of vortex clusters and what they look like in a Type-1.5 superconductor.

They found that under certain conditions they could describe new, additional forces at work between the Type-1.5 vortices, which can give vortex clusters very complicated structure. As more work is done on superconductivity, the team of physicists in Stockholm and at UMass Amherst say the family of multi-band superconducting materials will grow. They expect that some of the newly discovered materials will belong in Type 1.5.

"With the development of theory that works on the microscopic level, as well as our better understanding of inter-vortex interaction, we can now connect the properties of vortex clusters with the properties of electronic structure of concrete materials. This can be useful in establishing whether materials belong in the Type 1.5 superconductivity domain," says Babaev.

Explore further: Physicist pursues superconductivity mysteries

More information:

Related Stories

Superconductivity: The puzzle is taking shape

Sep 13, 2011

By destabilizing superconductivity with a strong magnetic field, the electrons of a "high temperature" superconductor align into linear filaments. This phenomenon has been demonstrated by a team of researchers ...

Superconductivity's third side unmasked

Jun 17, 2011

The debate over the mechanism that causes superconductivity in a class of materials called the pnictides has been settled by a research team from Japan and China. Superconductivity was discovered in the pnictides ...

Brown physicist discovers odd, fluctuating magnetic waves

Feb 23, 2010

At the quantum level, the forces of magnetism and superconductivity exist in an uneasy relationship. Superconducting materials repel a magnetic field, so to create a superconducting current, the magnetic forces ...

Stripes offer clues to superconductivity

May 17, 2010

New images of iron-based superconductors are providing telltale clues to the origin of superconductivity in a class of ceramic materials known as pnictides. The images reveal that electrons responsible for ...

Recommended for you

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.2 / 5 (9) Oct 24, 2011
IMO the superconductivity arises, when movable electrons are squeezed between atoms in such a way, their repulsive forces compensate mutually. The type I superconductors are squeezing electrons with attractive forces of their d- and f-orbitals, which doesn't provide very high temperatures of superconductive transition. Type II superconductors are using the attractive forces between whole groups of atoms in layers, which enables them to squeeze electrons more. They're forming the superconductive paths not at the atomic level, but at the lattice level. Which means, there are conductive stripes of electrons separated with many layers of "inert" atoms, the main purpose of which is to keep the electrons together.

In Type I SCs the magnetic vortices are single atom wide and they're always repulsive, in Type II SCs the magnetic vortices are attractive. The Type 1.5 SC is mixed state, so that the magnetic vortices are attractive at long distances, repulsive at short ones.
1.7 / 5 (9) Oct 24, 2011
Here you can find the video of simulations of magnetic vortices of Type 1.5 SCs with increasing level of pairing (from Type I to Type II): http://people.uma...ise.html
3 / 5 (6) Oct 24, 2011
What's superfow?
3.7 / 5 (9) Oct 24, 2011
What's superfow?

Superfow = the process of carefully editing scientific articles for correct spelling, punctuation and grammar.
2.6 / 5 (5) Oct 24, 2011
Better headline:

Supercomputers calculate that the superflow in superconductors is superfly.
2.3 / 5 (7) Oct 24, 2011
A new kind of superconductivity?

Not hardly.

It's a new application of superconductivity we were ignorant of knowing, until now.
3.7 / 5 (3) Oct 26, 2011
A new kind of superconductivity?

Not hardly.

It's a new application of superconductivity we were ignorant of knowing, until now.

New to us, Horus. I bet you're fun at parties.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.