Bang & Olufsen unleashes huge plasma TV with huger price: $85,000

Oct 05, 2011 By Shan Li
Bang & Olufsen unleashes huge plasma TV with huger price: $85,000

How can a home television set cost $85,000? It's big. Bang & Olufsen's new BeoVision 4-85 plasma TV has an 85-inch screen, measured diagonally, which conveniently comes out to $1,000 an inch.

But there is at least one other plasma TV of that size, and it costs far less. Panasonic's 85-inch model goes for about $40,000.

B&O, known mainly for its high-end audio equipment, boasts other attributes for its BeoVision set, including a triangular speaker system that jets out from under the screen, 3-D capability and proprietary enhancements to picture quality.

But the biggest difference, it turns out, is the stand the set sits on. It's a massive motorized unit that dramatically lifts the TV off the floor and into preset viewing positions with the push of the power button.

The screen and stand together are so heavy that the company won't sell the BeoVision 4-85 unless a structural engineer inspects the home floor space to ensure it won't cave under the weight.

"It's as much for our security as the customers'," said product manager Dave Zapfel, at the local debut of the TV at a B&O store in Beverly Hills, Calif. "We're talking about a 1,000-pound TV tipping over."

B&O started shipping the sets in July, at the rate of about 25 a month, and is selling out, according to Zean Nielsen, president of B&O America. The biggest markets for the BeoVision 4-85 have been in Russia and China, Nielsen said. About 25 have sold in the United States. Panasonic would not disclose sales figures for its 85-inch set.

"If you can buy a $200,000 car and spend $4 million on a house and own a couple of homes around the world," Zapfel said, "these are our customers." There's currently a 10-week waiting list to get one, Nielsen said.

The stand, made of steel tubing nearly an inch thick, features the same kind of mechanism as used in some hospital beds. After the TV slowly rises up, it can then be swiveled to the left or right, or tilted back and forward, all by remote control.

The motorized movement of the TV, the B&O website says, is something "that you just may find to be entertainment itself."

Perhaps more than "Jersey Shore."

For $85,000, most people will expect something in addition to stand movements, and the BeoVision 4-85 touts a proprietary picture quality system that features a robotic arm, hidden behind the frame, that pops down after every 100 viewing hours. It examines the screen close-up and makes adjustments to the color mix to compensate for changes that could come with age.

The company referred to this as "anti-wrinkle cream for your TV."

Another perk: Every time the TV is turned on, digital electronic curtains that mimic the velvet curtains at vintage movie theaters glide open across the screen.

Is that enough to justify $85,000?

It was for Helen Hu, 43, who bought one for the townhouse she recently purchased in San Francisco.

"It's very expensive, but if you want the best merchandise you need to pay much more money," said Hu, who works for a Chinese consumer electronics company. Her husband owns a construction company based in China.

She didn't stop at getting just the TV. She also purchased a set of external B&O speakers that go for about $23,000 a pair, and bought extra pairs of the electronic 3-D glasses the set uses.

Although B&O delivers the TV at no extra charge anywhere in the world, the company doesn't install it - Zapfel said that generally costs the buyer at least $10,000.

All in all, Hu said she spent about $135,000.

For consumers who want an even bigger TV, B&O sells a 103-inch version for a base price of $113,000. But Nielsen said the 85-inch model "is more friendly and easier to get into customers' homes. People seem to want something bigger than 65 inches and smaller than 103 inches."

Hans Michael, 59, stopped by the inaugural event in Beverly Hills. The investment banker, who lives in Malibu, said he has owned several B&O audio systems over the years. But he wasn't going for the BeoVision 4-85.

"They have great gadgets," Michael said, "but no matter how nice, I don't know what could be worth paying $85,000.

"After all, it's only a TV."

Explore further: FINsix small-size laptop adapter uses special power platform

1.5 /5 (4 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Panasonic to show TV at Stock Exchange

Apr 18, 2006

Panasonic will be showcasing the world's largest high-definition plasma television at the closing bell of the New York Stock Exchange Tuesday.

Samsung Develops First 70-inch LCD TV Panel

Aug 21, 2006

Samsung Electronics has developed the first 70-inch LCD panel for use in the consumer TV market. Currently, the largest LCD TV screen size is 65 inches. The company will unveil its 70-inch LCD HDTV at the ...

Panasonic's first 3-D TV set in $2,900 package

Mar 10, 2010

(AP) -- Panasonic Corp. on Wednesday revealed the price for its first 3-D TV set, confirming that $3,000 is about what it takes to be among the first to watch 3-D movies in the home.

Recommended for you

Study: Samsung phone durable, but iPhone has edge

Apr 14, 2014

Samsung's new Galaxy S5 smartphone is more durable than last year's model and other leading Android phones, but the iPhone 5s outperformed all of them in part because of its smaller size, a new study finds.

Invention loves collaboration at Milan show

Apr 14, 2014

Collaboration drove invention during Milan's annual International Furniture Show and collateral design week events, yielding the promise of homes without mobile phone chargers, and with more ergonomic seating, ...

Amazon 'to release smartphone later this year'

Apr 12, 2014

Amazon is preparing to release a smartphone in the second half of 2014, thrusting itself into a market already crowded with Apple and Samsung models, The Wall Street Journal reported.

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Noumenon
4.8 / 5 (46) Oct 05, 2011
I see Bang & Olufsen is trying to bring the audiophile' fraudulent "diminishing return on investment" concept to the TV market.

You can get a 92" Mitsubishi TV for $5,500.
Noumenon
4.8 / 5 (46) Oct 05, 2011
the company doesn't install it - Zapfel said that generally costs the buyer at least $10,000.


How does it cost $10,000 to "install" a TV?
Husky
not rated yet Oct 05, 2011
simple, the deep pockets buying this stuff do not expect there toys to be maintained/installed cheaply or they might feel they overpaid for the tv in the first place, besides its a sign of "Can afford it" to sit on my ass and have a tv installed for 10.000
Corban
5 / 5 (1) Oct 05, 2011
In the high end of the market, products are divided into two segments: premium and luxury. This is clearly luxury, with no premium advantage over the Mitsubishi TV. Rather than show off their quality of character, it reveals their ignorance of engineering. For this money, I could have modern knight armor made of nanotubes!
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (2) Oct 06, 2011
I see Bang & Olufsen is trying to bring the audiophile' fraudulent "diminishing return on investment" concept to the TV market.

B&O have always done that. They have always sold to the crowd for whom price is no object (and done well for themselves).
Vendicar_Decarian
5 / 5 (2) Oct 06, 2011
Suckers.
KBK
not rated yet Oct 18, 2011
yes, indeed, suckers.

I was running 10.5 feet diagonally, at over 1080P resolution, back in 1998.

Cost me about $5-6K back then. This, with an image fidelity to die for. Top notch CRT projectors from the used market could do/reach such qualities just fine. So I had to use them in a dark room. Big deal. Only an idiot wants to watch east-enders at 85" in a bright room. this is about THEATER, which is about darkened purposeful intent, rooms and presentations.

Thus giant plasmas and LCD TV's are the dreams of the masses, not the knowledgeable....and the masses don't have $85k to spend on a technology which will be $30k or less inside of 12-15 months.

But they can wank poetic about it.

This market is for the rich and no one ever said that the rich were intelligent. Just wankers with money. Ability to make money has no correlation to intelligence but it does have correlation to the animalism connected to reaching financial gain.

Am I purposely insinuating about the rich? Prolly.
antialias_physorg
not rated yet Oct 18, 2011
But you have to admit: B&O has some seriously well designed stuff.

Hey..it's like Apple products: Massively overpriced junk that looks good.
But some people are willing to shell out cash for what looks good. Let 'em. Not everyone puts their priorities on the tech aspects. And the rich do need to spend their cash on something.

More news stories

Tech giants look to skies to spread Internet

The shortest path to the Internet for some remote corners of the world may be through the skies. That is the message from US tech giants seeking to spread the online gospel to hard-to-reach regions.

Patent talk: Google sharpens contact lens vision

(Phys.org) —A report from Patent Bolt brings us one step closer to what Google may have in mind in developing smart contact lenses. According to the discussion Google is interested in the concept of contact ...

Wireless industry makes anti-theft commitment

A trade group for wireless providers said Tuesday that the biggest mobile device manufacturers and carriers will soon put anti-theft tools on the gadgets to try to deter rampant smartphone theft.

Astronomers: 'Tilt-a-worlds' could harbor life

A fluctuating tilt in a planet's orbit does not preclude the possibility of life, according to new research by astronomers at the University of Washington, Utah's Weber State University and NASA. In fact, ...