General Motors announces first center mounted airbags (w/ video)

Oct 03, 2011 by Bob Yirka weblog
General Motors will introduce the industry’s first front center air bag to help protect drivers and front passengers in far-side impact crashes where the affected occupant is on the opposite, non-struck side of the vehicle.

( -- General Motors, in a move to make driving automobiles safer, has announced it will be installing center-mounted airbags in three of its 2013 crossover vehicles. The center mounted airbags will be positioned next to the driver to protect occupants against far (passenger) side impacts.

GM has been working on the new airbags for the past three years after discovering that 11% of the fatalities involving people wearing seat-belts and sitting up front in 1999 model vehicles, were due to impacts that occurred on the far/passenger side.

The new air bag pops up out of the console between the driver and passenger, just next to the driver, when a far side impact is detected. The idea is that it will prevent the driver from crashing into someone sitting in the passenger seat if the vehicle they are in is struck by another vehicle on the passenger side. GM says it should also help prevent fatalities when there is no one in the passenger seat when such a collision occurs. Side impact accidents tend to force the upper body of the driver into the empty passenger seat resulting in violent twisting and turning which can cause serious or fatal spine and neck injuries. And it is expected that the new air bag will also help reduce injuries and death in rollover accidents as well.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

To develop the new , GM turned to Japanese partner Takata, a leading developer of seat belt, and other safe driving technology. The center mounted airbags are the first of their kind and GM says it’s all part of its continuing effort to make driving automotive vehicles as safe as possible. In its initial run, the new air bags will be installed in the Chevy Traverse, Buick Enclave and GMC Acadia.

Such air bags are not required by the U.S. government, but if they turn out to save as many lives (or prevent as many injuries) as GM believes they will, then the government might make them so at some point in the future.

The front center air bag deploys from the right side of the driver’s seat and is designed to provide restraint during passenger-side crashes when the driver is the only front occupant.

GM showed off the new air bags at the Milford Proving Grounds in Michigan to a group of industry analysts and insurance executives and it appears that most, especially the insurance group, were impressed with the results.

Explore further: PsiKick's batteryless sensors poised for coming 'Internet of things'

More information: Press release

Related Stories

Back seat less safe: Australian study

Aug 31, 2010

Adults who ride in the back of new cars are at higher risk of serious injury during an accident than those in the front seat, new research has found.

Recommended for you

Large streams of data warn cars, banks and oil drillers

Apr 16, 2014

Better warning systems that alert motorists to a collision, make banks aware of the risk of losses on bad customers, and tell oil companies about potential problems with new drilling. This is the aim of AMIDST, the EU project ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Oct 03, 2011
Why not just fill the entire cabin with foam? I'm not sure what it's called but I know there is a liquid that, when combined with a catalyst, basically "explodes" into low density foam, which then quickly deteriorates. This should be enough to cushion any impact and protect from flying debris at the same time, and then deteriorate or "melt" fast enough so as to not suffocate the passengers...

Anyone know why this hasn't been done?
5 / 5 (1) Oct 03, 2011
Such low-density foam does not protect from impact. To try it out, you might fasten a shower sponge on your head and walk into a wall. Hardly any better than without.
1 / 5 (1) Oct 04, 2011
Density does not imply anything about rigidity. I was under the impression the stuff was fairly sturdy for the few seconds before it started to deteriorate.
5 / 5 (1) Oct 04, 2011
Yeah, but i think there's heat generated along with the foam. Too much heat for the skin to take.

More news stories

Hackathon team's GoogolPlex gives Siri extra powers

( —Four freshmen at the University of Pennsylvania have taken Apple's personal assistant Siri to behave as a graduate-level executive assistant which, when asked, is capable of adjusting the temperature ...

Better thermal-imaging lens from waste sulfur

Sulfur left over from refining fossil fuels can be transformed into cheap, lightweight, plastic lenses for infrared devices, including night-vision goggles, a University of Arizona-led international team ...

Researchers discover target for treating dengue fever

Two recent papers by a University of Colorado School of Medicine researcher and colleagues may help scientists develop treatments or vaccines for Dengue fever, West Nile virus, Yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis and other ...