Hypothetically tweaking: Research shows questions can influence behavior, promote bias

Oct 06, 2011

Hypothetically speaking, if someone told you that a hypothetical question could influence your judgments or behaviour, would you believe them?

University of Alberta Business researcher Sarah Moore's research has shown that hypothetical questions are not as innocuous as one would believe. In a study recently published in the journal Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, Moore and her colleagues found that hypothetical questions can be used to influence people's and opinions. The problem exists, she says, because people are unaware of the potential for these questions to bias behaviours.

"In general, we have theories about when people are trying to influence us. For example, we have some defenses against advertising," Moore said. "But hypothetical questions are in sheep's clothing because we don't think of them as being influence tactics."

Leading the respondent

Hypothetical questions, which are frequently used in jury selection and political polling, can be used to create a bias or further entrench an existing belief, says Moore, and that the purpose of using these questions in a pre-trial examination of potential jurors is to detect bias. However, one study revealed that pre-trial questions can actually create bias. Two groups participating in a jury study were asked the following question: "Hypothetically speaking, if the individual in this court case was a member of a gang, would that influence your ability to be impartial?"

One group, the debiased group, was told that the question was developed by lawyers and should not influence their ; this debiased group was less likely to convict than the group that was not cautioned about letting the questions bias them. Moore says that by not reminding them of the hypothetical nature of the question, the biased group seemed to view the content as fact rather than a supposition.

"This pre-trial questioning in the jury system, particularly in the United States, is supposed to fix bias, but can actually introduce it instead," she said. "It goes back to being aware that the question can influence you."

Politics, push polls and poisoned beliefs

Moore says a popular form of questioning used by political parties, known as push polling, often uses a negative message to which a person will respond. She says that hypothetical questions give us new information that may or may not match our stereotypes and attitudes. The problem with this type of questioning, she says, lies with the fact that the word "if" is clouded by the negative tone being put forth, one that becomes a truth rather than imaginary scenario.

"For instance, if I introduce someone to new, hypothetical information about a certain politician being crooked, even though the information isn't true, the question will influence them over time because it matches their existing, negative beliefs about politicians," said Moore. "They'll become more negative about that politician and less likely to vote for him, and their attitude about politicians in general will become more negative."

Correction, please!

The key to preventing bias in hypothetical questions, Moore says, is to recognize the potential influence of the question. Respondents need to recognize that the information being introduced and presented to them is hypothetical and not factual in nature. She says that the more people think about the hypothetical question, without taking into account that the information provided is suppositional, the stronger the effects of bias appear to be. Recognizing that these types of questions can be used to influence one's response, however, is the first line of defense in preventing hypothetical questions from influencing one's thoughts or feelings.

"When people are made aware that the situation is hypothetical or that people are trying to influence or bias them by asking them these questions, then they are able to correct for that ," said Moore. "They can then think about how they actually feel about the question and not be overly influenced by it.

"Hopefully, as people become more aware of this issue, hypothetical questions won't work as well to sway us."

Explore further: A two generation lens: Current state policies fail to support families with young children

Related Stories

Hypothetical questions can influence behavior

Sep 20, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- With the election cycle now underway, many Americans will be responding to political polls about who they support in the races for president and other offices. But can the poll questions themselves influence ...

Tell me where it hurts

Nov 10, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- A University of Connecticut study finds that the way a question is phrased is important when assessing pain.

Stereotypes, bias and personnel decisions

Dec 03, 2008

In an article in the December issue of the journal Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Frank J. Landy questions research that is said to demonstrate that stereotypes about social groups bias personnel decisions. He arg ...

The myth of the 'queen bee': Work and sexism

Jun 20, 2011

Female bosses sometimes have a reputation for not being very nice. Some display what's called "queen bee" behavior, distancing themselves from other women and refusing to help other women as they rise through the ranks. Now, ...

Recommended for you

Scholar tracks the changing world of gay sexuality

21 hours ago

With same-sex marriage now legalized in 19 states and laws making it impossible to ban homosexuals from serving in the military, gay, lesbian and bisexual people are now enjoying more freedoms and rights than ever before.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

that_guy
5 / 5 (1) Oct 06, 2011
Congratulations! You just rediscovered the teachings of aristotle and socrates regarding rhetoric.

I understand that this research is good as it applies to modern day, and the excessively keen use of it by limbaugh and o'reilly, but seriously, stop with the stupid premises. No, really, stop.

University of Alberta Business researcher Sarah Moore's research has shown that hypothetical questions are not as innocuous as one would believe.


If you believe that hypothetical questions are always innocuous, then you slept through history, social studies, and debate...
Callippo
not rated yet Oct 06, 2011
Such a questions are hardwired in negative psychology so firmly, they became an immanent part of courtesies and common phraseology - which is manipulative in its very nature, don't you think so?

Why not just to say "do you think so?" Because people tend to delimit oneself against direct request or direction. They're expecting the beckon and appeal, i.e. the verbal manipulation.
Callippo
not rated yet Oct 06, 2011
If you believe that hypothetical questions are always innocuous, then you slept through history, social studies, and debate
If you believe, the researchers could keep their jobs without inventing the artificial problems - then you probably missed the overemployment problem of modern intelligence, which is educated whole years for spending the rest of life with research of common trivialities..;-)