Hubble survey carries out a dark matter census
This image from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope shows the galaxy cluster MACS J1206. Galaxy clusters like these have enormous mass, and their gravity is powerful enough to visibly bend the path of light, somewhat like a magnifying glass. These so-called lensing clusters are useful tools for studying very distant objects, because this lens-like behaviour amplifies the light from faraway galaxies in the background. They also contribute to a range of topics in cosmology, as the precise nature of the lensed images encapsulates information about the properties of spacetime and the expansion of the cosmos. This is one of 25 clusters being studied as part of the CLASH (Cluster Lensing and Supernova survey with Hubble) programme, a major project to build a library of scientific data on lensing clusters. Credit: Image courtesy of NASA, ESA, M. Postman (STScI) and the CLASH Team
(PhysOrg.com) -- The NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope has been used to make an image of galaxy cluster MACS J1206.2-0847. The apparently distorted shapes of distant galaxies in the background is caused by an invisible substance called dark matter, whose gravity bends and distorts their light rays. MACS 1206 has been observed as part of a new survey of galaxy clusters using Hubble.
Cluster MACS J1206.2-0847 (or MACS 1206 for short) is one of the first targets in a Hubble survey that will allow astronomers to construct the highly detailed dark matter maps of more galaxy clusters than ever before. These maps are being used to test previous but surprising results that suggest that dark matter is more densely packed inside clusters than some models predict. This might mean that galaxy cluster assembly began earlier than commonly thought.
The Cluster Lensing And Supernova survey with Hubble (CLASH) probes, with unparalleled precision, the distribution of dark matter in 25 massive clusters of galaxies. So far, the CLASH team has observed six of the 25 clusters.
Dark matter makes up the bulk of the Universe's mass, yet it can only be detected by measuring how its gravity tugs on visible matter and warps the fabric of space-time like a fairground mirror so that the light from distant objects is distorted.
Galaxy clusters like MACS 1206 are perfect laboratories for studying dark matter's gravitational effects because they are the most massive structures in the Universe to be held together by gravity. Because of their immense gravitational pull, the clusters act like giant cosmic lenses, amplifying, distorting and bending any light that passes through them -- an effect known as gravitational lensing.
This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
This video zooms in on galaxy cluster MACS J1206.2-0847 (or MACS 1206 for short). The cluster has been observed by Hubble as part of CLASH (Cluster Lensing and Supernova survey with Hubble), a major programme to observe galaxy clusters whose gravity bends and distorts light passing through them. Credit: NASA, ESA, Digitzed Sky Survey 2, M. Postman (STScI) and the CLASH Survey Team. Music: John Dyson (from the album Moonwind)
Lensing effects can also produce multiple images of the same distant object, as is evident in this Hubble picture. In particular, the apparent numbers and shapes of the distant galaxies far beyond a galaxy cluster become distorted as the light passes through, yielding a visible measurement of how much mass there is in the intervening cluster, and how it is distributed. The substantial lensing distortions seen are proof that the dominant mass component of the clusters is dark matter. The distortions would be far weaker if the clusters' gravity came only from visible matter.
MACS 1206 lies four billion light-years from Earth. Hubble's keen vision helped CLASH astronomers to uncover 47 multiple images of 12 newly identified faraway galaxies. Finding so many multiple images in a cluster is a unique capability of Hubble, and the CLASH survey is optimised to find them. The new observations build on earlier work by Hubble and ground-based telescopes.
Among the observations which complement Hubble's is a major project using the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope. Unlike Hubble, which is making images of the clusters, the VLT is carrying out spectroscopic observations, where instruments split up the galaxies' light into their component colours letting the scientists draw inferences about many of the properties of the cluster galaxies, including their distance and chemical makeup.
Taking advantage of two of Hubble's powerful cameras, the Advanced Camera for Surveys and the Wide Field Camera 3, the CLASH survey covers a broad wavelength range, from ultraviolet to near-infrared.
Astronomers need the diverse colours to estimate the distances to the lensed galaxies and to study them in more detail. Hubble's unique capabilities allow astronomers to estimate distances to galaxies that are four times fainter than those that ground-based telescopes can see.
The era when the first clusters formed is not precisely known, but is estimated to be at least nine billion years ago and possibly as far back as twelve billion years ago. If most of the clusters in the CLASH survey are found to have excessively high accumulations of dark matter in their central cores, then it may yield new clues about the early stages of the origin of structure in the Universe.
Future telescopes like the NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), a space-based infrared observatory now being built, will be able to study the fainter lensed galaxies in clusters like MACS 1206 in greater detail. JWST will be powerful enough to observe the spectra of some of the magnified galaxies and study their early chemical composition.
Provided by
ESA/Hubble Information Centre
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Distance of planets from stars and revolution
4 hours ago
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
2 hours ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
4 hours ago |
4 / 5 (1) |
10
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
4 hours ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (14) |
40
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Oct 13, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (9)
It would be helpful to have a clear explanation of differences between "dark matter" and compressed nuclear matter that is commonly identified as "black holes" or "neutron stars."
Thanks for your assistance.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://myprofile....anuelo09
http://dl.dropbox...reer.pdf
Oct 13, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Here's the main _observational_ difference: compact massive objects are not really dark, because they tend to accrete nearby matter, and the high-energy emissions from those accretion disks (and the accompanying polar jets) are very easily detected. For neutron stars, accreting matter impacting on the star's surface at relativistic velocities, makes the star shine very brightly indeed.
The main _theoretical_ difference is that dark matter haloes extend far beyond the visible outskirts of galaxies. Compact massive objects would be expected to migrate toward galactic cores (flinging ordinary matter outward in the process), rather than to hang out on the periphery in a highly uniform, sparse distribution.
Oct 13, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Ah come on. Precise? How can anything that is hypothesized be called precise?
Oct 13, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Oct 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Well that explains a lot of things. Like you not knowing that if Black Holes are stopped by NR then Neutron stars couldn't exist either. Of course there are all those claims that NR is causing galaxies to fragment and you spammed the site with that dozens of times.
Now to point out another thing about Neutron Repulsion as you have described it. If it has the range to fragment galaxies and the strength and range to block the formation of ANY black holes then it not only is strong enough to stop the formation of neutron stars but also ANYTHING that is held together by gravity.>>
Oct 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Now will you address this issue. Or will you continue to evade it.
Ethelred
Oct 15, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
1. Over fifty years ago President Dwight D. Eisenhower solemnly warned of the danger to our democracy if a "scientific-technological elite" ever took control [Farewell address (17 Jan 1961)]
Document: http://mcadams.po.../ike.htm
Video: www.youtube.com/w...ld5PR4ts
2. Last week an editorial in Nature confirmed the danger of using consensus models as scientific facts [Nature 5, 7 (5 Oct 2011)]
http://www.nature...07a.html
3. Forty years (1971-2001) of lock-step, consensus models have damaged:
a.) The vitality of government science,
b.) The integrity of government science,
c.) Sexism and racism in government science, and
c.) The fragile self-governance we inherited in 1776!
http://judithcurr...scholar/
http://judithcurr...t-121893
Oliver K. Manuel
http://myprofile....anuelo09
Oct 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I am so glad that is all cleared. Now we are quite clear on the fact that you don't a clue on how bad your theory. Not surprising since ELSEWHERE you have said you aren't a good at theory.
Yet here you are insisting you inadequate disproved theory must be the right one and all the people that are good at theory are all wrong. And yes it is disproved. My question that you refuse to even acknowledge shows with extreme clarity that you are wrong.
True Oliver is not a sexist. He abuses people of any sex.
For decades Oliver has tried to prop up a theory by attacking all opponents in highly personal ways. He attacks me by claiming I am a paid part of a vast conspiracy against him.
Answer the questions or admit you are wrong. If you were right you could answer.
That is not an editorial. It does not support Cranking.
Ethelred