The high energy crab
An image of the Crab Nebula taken by the Hubble Space Telescope. Observations of the Crab in gamma-rays find surprisingly bright emission. Credit: NASA
(PhysOrg.com) -- The Crab Nebula is the remnant of a supernova. Its precursor star exploded in 1054 AD in an event that was recorded by Chinese and (quite probably) Anasazi Indian astronomers. It is called the Crab Nebula because it has many tentacle-like gas filaments extending outward nearly radially. At the center of the explosion is a pulsar, the spinning, super-dense stellar ash often left behind after a supernova explosion. Supernovae play a critical role in the cosmic ecosystem, because they seed space with the elements needed for life, including carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen. All of these elements are made in the precursor stars as a byproduct of nuclear burning; none were present in the early days of the universe.
Although supernovae have been seen since 1054, pulsars were only detected in 1968 thanks to advances in radio telescopes and the fact that pulsars have strong radio emission. Pulsars are rapidly spinning (the Crab pulsar spins about 30 times a second) and have strong magnetic fields. Charged particles in this environment are whipped around at nearly the speed of light, and as a result they shine at wavelengths from very low energy radio to very high energy gamma rays. Studying this light provides key information about the physical processes underway both in pulsars and supernovae. Surprises from these extreme conditions regularly turn up.
CfA astronomers Nicola Galante, Danny Gibbs, Emmet Thomas, Martin Schroedter, and Trevor Weekes, along with a large team of colleagues, used the VERITAS array of telescopes in Arizona to study the high energy gamma-rays from the Crab Nebula. They made two remarkable discoveries: first, they saw the gamma-rays pulsing, just as radiation at shorter wavelengths does. More significantly, they found that these gamma-rays were extremely intense - much brighter than expected from conventional models of pulsar emission. Writing in the latest issue of Science magazine, the scientists conclude that the gamma-rays cannot come from usual pulsar mechanisms like accelerating charged particles. Instead, they suggest the process whereby light is scattered by fast-moving electrons in the outer reaches of the pulsar environment. The new paper adds new insights to the nature of a pulsar's environment, and is a powerful reminder about the surprises nature still has in store.
Provided by
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Distance of planets from stars and revolution
4 hours ago
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
2 hours ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
4 hours ago |
4 / 5 (1) |
10
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
4 hours ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (14) |
40
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Oct 31, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
http://www.presto...ndex.htm
Oct 31, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Oct 31, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
1. Are brighter than expected from conventional models of pulsar emission;
2. Cannot come from usual pulsar mechanisms;
3. Add new insights on a pulsar's environment; and
4. Remind us of the surprises nature still has in store.
In 1960, the Crab Nebula was one of the first puzzling clues I encountered that suggested:
1. Pulsars are not just dead nuclear embers of stars.
2. Pulsars are highly energetic cosmic objects powered by some source of energy other than fusion.
It took 40 years before we finally realized that pulsars are powered by repulsive interactions between neutrons [1,2].
1. 32nd Lunar Sci. Conference, paper #1041 (12-16 Mar 2001)
www.omatumr.com/lpsc.prn.pdf
2. APEIRON J., in press (2011)
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://myprofile....anuelo09
Nov 01, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
1. Pulsars are not just dead nuclear embers of stars.
2. Pulsars are highly energetic cosmic objects powered by some source of energy other than fusion."
In 1960 pulsars were an unknown to science. Pulsars were not ID until 1967 and the pulsar associated with the Crab SNR was not discovered until 1968:
http://www.astro....ery1.pdf
http://en.wikiped...b_Pulsar
(The word "pulsar" first appeared in print in 1968)
Are you sure of your date?
Nov 01, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Oh well at least when he is convicted of raping his children his incarceration and castration should stop the spamming.
http://mominer.ms...hildren/]http://mominer.ms...hildren/[/url]
http://www.homefa...uel.html
http://mominer.ms...hildren/]http://mominer.ms...hildren/[/url]
Nov 01, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Nov 01, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The momentum of the rotating pulsar which is transferred to the ionized gas in space around the pulsar by the strong magnetic field of the pulsar. This transfer is why the pulsation rate decreases over time.
The second source of energy is dependent of the pulsar having a companion star. Matter that is stripped from the companion falls in towards the pulsar thus transferring angular momentum from the companion to the pulsar and thus whipping it up much higher spins than the Crab has.
There is no sign of energy being released by your hypothetical neutron repulsion nor even by neutron decay. And of course if neutron repulsion worked the way you claim then there would be no pulsars, stars, planets or you.
JS MM give it rest.
Ethelred
Nov 02, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)