For land conservation, formal and informal relationships influence success

Oct 31, 2011

During the past decade, voluntary contracts called conservation easements have become a popular method for conserving land.

Embodied in an agreement between landowners and a government or non-governmental organization, these easements have differing goals, structures and financial arrangements.

As the area protected by easements has grown to 30 million acres, questions have multiplied. Are easements the most efficient way to conserve land and biodiversity? What easement structures are the most effective?

The answers are difficult to obtain, says Adena Rissman, an assistant professor in forest and at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who began exploring easements about 10 years ago.

"It's become clear that easements are not going to be easy to assess, compared to common park or wilderness area models, given the diverse goals, processes, and financing," Rissman says.

In a study published in late September in the journal Society and Natural Resources, Rissman and Nathan Sayre of the University of California compared two large easement projects dominated by : the Malpai Borderlands Group, straddling the Arizona-New Mexico border, and The Nature Conservancy's Lassen Foothills, in northern California.

Each project has more than 80,000 acres under easements, but they have differing origins, structures and conservation requirements, Rissman says. The borderlands project was intended to preserve habitat for the ranchers who had sold easements to a land trust that they control. The foothills easements are held by The Nature Conservancy, which helped fund Rissman's research and has explicit goals.

Although Rissman has long been interested in the efficacy of easements, her goal in this study was to explore the social relationships that helped or hindered progress, using interviews with landowners, conservation organizations, and scientists.

Social relationships, she says, affect the nature, terms and methods of the easement agreement, even when the easements have broadly similar goals in conserving grazing land.

"In comparing the two cases, we assumed that landowner goals and land trust goals were more closely aligned for Malpai than for Lassen, since in Malpai, landowners make up the majority of the land trust board," Rissman says. "So we expected to find that the Malpai easements would contain fewer restrictions, that the restrictions would be behavior-based rather than performance-based, and that the monitoring would be less intensive, and this matches pretty closely what we found."

Also as expected, Rissman adds, Lassen contained a greater focus on direct conservation outcomes.

The surprising thing, Rissman says, was "the important role of informal, personal relationships. These were a stronger driver of conservation outcomes in Malpai, where ranchers were working together to raise funds for research and land management."

The tight social relationships at Malpai Borderlands existed long before the easements were written, Rissman says.

"Malpai is a unique organization created by a unique confluence of events, a longstanding effort to bring together the landowners to support their relations with governmental agencies that own a great deal of land in the region, and from which the ranchers lease large areas," Rissman says.

The Lassen project is more typical, with diverse landowners, and the easement process tended to strengthen social relationships that were looser to begin with, Rissman says. "The existing social situation of each area helped determine how the land trust worked with landowners, and that affected the ability to meet conservation goals. Malpai was more concerned with preserving the grazing character of the land, and its major outcome was to limit building; the easements contained few restrictions on how ranchers managed their land."

Beyond restricting development, the Lassen easements prohibited the scraping and collection of volcanic rock from the grasslands, and required some landowners to install cattle-proof fences along streams to reduce erosion and water pollution. Lassen also had an enforceable requirement that landowners retain a certain amount of stubble through the winter to prevent erosion.

Particularly at Malpai, having outside advice and expertise was key to success, Rissman says. "Consultants and scientists participated; this was not a do-it-yourself project."

As far as can be told, both projects are meeting their goals, which reflects both a workable structure and effective management of , Rissman says. "When we design and evaluate conservation programs, we need to pay close attention to these relationships, both formal and informal. Land managers need to account for more than just trees and birds. This is not just about resources, it's also about managing relationships among people."

Explore further: Green dream: Can UN summit revive climate issue?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Your view of personal goals can affect your relationships

Nov 16, 2010

whether it's to improve yourself or to do better than others—can affect whether you reach those goals. Different kinds of goals can also have distinct effects on your relationships with people around you, according to ...

New methods used to follow land use

Jun 12, 2006

Dutch researcher Koen Overmars has used a combination of analyses to gain insight into how land use is changing in San Mariano on the Philippines.

Papua New Guinea declares first national conservation area

Mar 03, 2009

The southeast Pacific nation of Papua New Guinea, home to some of the most biologically diverse ecosystems on Earth, has created its first national conservation area to preserve forever a swath of pristine tropical forest ...

Recommended for you

Green dream: Can UN summit revive climate issue?

7 hours ago

Five years ago, the environment movement was in its heyday as politicians, actors, rock stars and protestors demanded a looming UN summit brake the juggernaut of climate change.

Rio's Olympic golf course in legal bunker

Sep 18, 2014

The return of golf to the Olympics after what will be 112 years by the time Rio hosts South America's first Games in 2016 comes amid accusations environmental laws were got round to build the facility in ...

User comments : 0