US firm confirms web censoring tools used in Syria

Oct 29, 2011
A US firm specializing in Internet censoring equipment on Friday confirmed that Syria was using its products to block web activity, amid a brutal crackdown on anti-regime protests.

A US firm specializing in Internet censoring equipment on Friday confirmed that Syria was using its products to block web activity, amid a brutal crackdown on anti-regime protests.

Northern California-based Blue Coat Systems told AFP that Internet filtering equipment sold to Iraq's communications ministry has mysteriously been put to use in Syria but insisted it did not know how the equipment changed hands.

The United States bars selling any such equipment to Syria.

"The evidence points to it being in Syria," a Blue Coat official said, referring to analysis of data logs and computer address numbers from Syria's Internet posted by 'hactivists.'

"Since we didn't sell it there, we don't know the particulars," said the official, who asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter.

The official said that it appears that at least 13 of the 14 Web censoring "appliances" shipped to Iraq -- which combine computer hardware and software -- are being used in Syria.

That would be enough equipment to effectively curb in that country, according to the company, which said the equipment was shipped to Dubai for delivery to the Iraqi government.

Paperwork marking the chain of custody gave the impression the Internet filtering gear had been delivered to the intended customer, according to the company.

The estimates that more than 3,000 people, mostly , have been killed in the bloody of anti-regime that have rocked Syria since mid-March.

Explore further: Study: Social media users shy away from opinions

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Signs Syria may be lifting Facebook, YouTube ban

Feb 08, 2011

(AP) -- Internet users in Syria said Tuesday that Facebook and YouTube were available for the first time in three years amid signs Damascus may be lifting its ban on the popular social networking websites.

Apparent pro-Syria group hacks Harvard website

Sep 26, 2011

(AP) -- Hackers have briefly defaced Harvard University's website, replacing the home page with an image of Syria's President Bashar Assad together with a message accusing the U.S. of supporting the uprising against him ...

Recommended for you

Study: Social media users shy away from opinions

Aug 26, 2014

People on Facebook and Twitter say they are less likely to share their opinions on hot-button issues, even when they are offline, according to a surprising new survey by the Pew Research Center.

US warns shops to watch for customer data hacking

Aug 23, 2014

The US Department of Homeland Security on Friday warned businesses to watch for hackers targeting customer data with malicious computer code like that used against retail giant Target.

Fitbit to Schumer: We don't sell personal data

Aug 22, 2014

The maker of a popular line of wearable fitness-tracking devices says it has never sold personal data to advertisers, contrary to concerns raised by U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer.

Should you be worried about paid editors on Wikipedia?

Aug 22, 2014

Whether you trust it or ignore it, Wikipedia is one of the most popular websites in the world and accessed by millions of people every day. So would you trust it any more (or even less) if you knew people ...

Philippines makes arrests in online extortion ring

Aug 22, 2014

Philippine police have arrested eight suspected members of an online syndicate accused of blackmailing more than 1,000 Hong Kong and Singapore residents after luring them into exposing themselves in front of webcam, an official ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

kaasinees
0.3 / 5 (22) Oct 29, 2011
USA the most hypocritical country in the world, how can you judge China and Syria for using censoring tools when you have one to? Homeland security has the ability to hijack DNS records without asking a judge first.
sigfpe
1 / 5 (1) Oct 29, 2011
@kaasinees When a US firm talks about filtering software being used in another country (1) it isn't the USA, it's a private company and (2) this company was merely reporting the use of their software, not making judgments.
kaasinees
0.3 / 5 (22) Oct 29, 2011
@sigfpe
1. The research must be funded by someone, who has benefit for this knowledge?
2. The government does not have the expertise to do this research. Technology related research/production is always outsourced.

In October 2011 it was reported [12] [13] that the US government is looking into claims made by Telecomix that the Syrian government is using the companies products in order to help them restrict internet access from its citizens. The hacktivist group released 54Gb of log data alleged to have been taken from seven Blue Coat web gateway appliances. This showed that search terms including 'Israel' and 'proxy' were blocked in the country using the appliances. [14] Blue Coat has denied these allegations and says that it is posible that their equipment could be acquired via the grey market or on eBay.