Part I: The energy that drives the stars comes closer to Earth

Oct 20, 2011 By Paul Preuss
The sun releases energy when, under gravitational pressure, light elements combine to form heavier elements. Scientists seek to control fusion on Earth by different methods. In one form of inertial confinement fusion, target capsules of hydrogen isotopes inside a cylinder (a “hohlraum”) are ignited by intense x rays emitted when the inside of the cylinder is struck by laser or particle beams. Credit: NASA TRACE mission, LLNL National Ignition Facility

Nuclear fusion drives the stars, including our sun. But on Earth, despite efforts dating to the 1940s, sustained and controlled fusion for electrical power production has never been realized. Research persists, because few energy sources could be greener. Fusion yields far more energy than any other source per unit of mass; its heavy-hydrogen fuel is plentiful in sea water; burning it produces not a trace of carbon.

There’s more than one scheme for producing power; the two main categories are magnetic confinement and inertial fusion . A promising approach to inertial fusion energy, called heavy-ion fusion (HIF), has long been advocated by scientists at the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab).

In inertial fusion, the fuel is a solid target made of frozen isotopes of hydrogen (deuterium, or deuterium and tritium), which is instantly heated to fusion temperature when hit by driver beams of laser light or energetic particles. The heavy-ion fusion approached pursued at Berkeley Lab uses driver beams of ions (atoms lacking one or more electrons) whose atomic mass is generally greater than 100 – cesium or xenon, for example. (For comparison, iron has an atomic mass of 55.85.)

Most controlled-fusion efforts today involve magnetic confinement, however, with the most common reactors being the doughnut-shaped chambers called tokamaks. Tokamaks try to contain, squeeze, and heat a plasma of isotopes with magnetic fields, long enough for the nuclei to fuse. Magnetic-confinement research continues, but the inertial fusion energy approach has lately been gaining new attention.

Working toward heavy-ion fusion

In the spring of 2011, Berkeley Lab’s Accelerator and Fusion Research Division (AFRD) held a Workshop on Accelerators for Heavy Ion Fusion that drew 68 participants from national laboratories, universities, and private companies in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. For four days the members debated the best kinds of ion sources, the best kinds of ion-beam accelerators, the interface between the beams and the reactor chambers, and the best kinds of targets and how to position them.

“A couple of things are driving renewed interest in inertial fusion, and especially heavy-ion fusion,” says AFRD’s Peter Seidl, who chaired the workshop’s organizing committee. “One is the National Ignition Facility’s campaign to achieve ‘burn and gain,’ in which more energy is generated from the fusion reaction than went into creating it. Ignition is the sine qua non of fusion power, a goal they hope to reach soon.”

Although intended mainly for weapons research – by testing fusion reactions in miniature – the laser-based National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has always had the important goal of demonstrating the potential of fusion power production as well. Successful “burn and gain” ignition is a necessary first step to validate the promise of inertial fusion energy.

NIF is a multi-billion dollar installation that uses 192 high-powered laser beams to ignite pea-sized targets inside a small gold cylinder called a hohlraum (German for “hollow space”). What ignites the target are not the driver laser beams themselves but pressure from the x-rays these beams produce when they bounce off the inner walls of the hohlraum.

“A second thing that’s sparked interest in heavy-ion fusion is that the National Academies will soon issue a report on the prospects for inertial confinement,” Seidl says. “Their mission is to evaluate the various systems, identify the challenges, and advise DOE on a research program that would deliver the scientific and technical basis for a decision to build an IFE demonstration plant.”

A target in an inertial fusion reaction chamber is bathed in x-rays that ablate its surface, causing a rocket effect that squeezes and heats the target until it ignites and burns. For continuous power production, new targets would be injected into the chamber five to 10 times each second.

Seidl points out that such a facility would necessarily be on the scale of NIF – in other words, big – but devoted solely to energy research and the demonstration of power production.

Early designs for a heavy-ion fusion reactor called for high-power beams of ions, produced in an accelerator, to be focused on a pea-sized hohlraum and fusion capsule like those being tested at NIF. The ion beams would heat the hohlraum, in turn bathing the capsule in x-rays. This would ablate the surface of the fusion capsule inside, creating a rocket effect that would implode and crush it. The fuel would burn so quickly that it would be confined long enough to ignite and maintain fusion.

One advantage for heavy-ion fusion is the familiar technology of particle accelerators. Existing heavy-ion accelerators for basic research, like the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven National Laboratory or the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN (when used to collide heavy ions like lead instead of protons), have individually demonstrated several of the necessary features required by HIF.

These machines use radio-frequency (RF) power to create a series of strong electric fields that accelerate bunches of atomic nuclei to very high energies in two opposed beams. To generate the required power, however, HIF would require many more beams, accelerating many more ions per bunch.

HIF researchers choose a combination of ion energy and ion mass that allows a short “ion range” – short enough that the ions deposit virtually all their energy near the surface of the target. This is a much lower energy than the top energy at RHIC or LHC, suggesting that a different kind of accelerator is needed for optimum performance.

Explore further: Uncovering the forbidden side of molecules

More information: Part II: The energy that drives the stars - different technologies for unique demands

Related Stories

Researchers at NIF moving closer to fusion ignition point

Sep 13, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Researchers at the U.S. National Ignition Facility (NIF) report that they are growing ever closer to reaching the ignition point with their laser generated nuclear fusion project. The facility, ...

Recommended for you

Uncovering the forbidden side of molecules

Sep 21, 2014

Researchers at the University of Basel in Switzerland have succeeded in observing the "forbidden" infrared spectrum of a charged molecule for the first time. These extremely weak spectra offer perspectives ...

How Paramecium protozoa claw their way to the top

Sep 19, 2014

The ability to swim upwards – towards the sun and food supplies – is vital for many aquatic microorganisms. Exactly how they are able to differentiate between above and below in often murky waters is ...

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Husky
1 / 5 (3) Oct 20, 2011
how about spraying an ionic mist inside the wire array of a Z-machine just prior to firing, maybe the EM field of the collapsing array will drag the ions with it?
hjbasutu
1 / 5 (3) Oct 21, 2011
It seems most people are obsessed with use of brute force...isn't cold fusion much better..
rawa1
1 / 5 (3) Oct 21, 2011
..the energy that drives the stars comes closer to Earth..
It's because the Earth sucks?
.isn't cold fusion much better
It depends... It's like the selling of bottled air. You could make money in much ore reliable way with process, which is expensive and difficult to replicate.
JIMBO
1 / 5 (2) Oct 22, 2011
This, ITER, NIF, & ALL the other fusion pgms are BS ! However, stay tuned 1 wk from today when Andrea Rossi will demo his Working fusion 1 MegaWatt generator for the entire world to see & marvel at; http://www.wired....d-fusion
jsdarkdestruction
5 / 5 (3) Oct 22, 2011
This, ITER, NIF, & ALL the other fusion pgms are BS ! However, stay tuned 1 wk from today when Andrea Rossi will demo his Working fusion 1 MegaWatt generator for the entire world to see & marvel at; http://www.wired....d-fusion

I hope he does and cold fusion is the cheap plentiful energy source of the future. At the same time i'd also be willing to bet that it does not.

I have to say im amazed oliver k manuel hasnt polluted this thread w/his neutron repulsion being the source of the suns energy yet.......just a matter of time i bet.
rawa1
1 / 5 (2) Oct 24, 2011
At the same time i'd also be willing to bet that it does not.
What actually prohibits the cold fusion? We know about many reactions of atom nuclei with electrons (beta decay involving K-capture) and protons in nickel and palladium are deeply embedded into electron orbitals. The remaining electrons shield them against repulsive force of nickel nuclei.

Before the WWW II the nuclear fission was found. Suddenly, all reference to it disappeared about it from scientific journals, because it become of strategical interest. Stalin recognized from this silence, the nuclear fusion is really important stuff and he started to build his own nuclear industry.

Now we are facing WWW III and the situation just repeats with cold fusion finding. http://en.wikiped..._program

Without wide scale implementation of cold fusion the WWW III is very serious risk, because the world is running out of oil and the global financial crisis is undeniable.
Eoprime
not rated yet Oct 25, 2011
WWW II


World Wide War?
I smiled

bugmenot23
not rated yet Oct 27, 2011
The world isn't running out of oil or natural gas. Peak oil is decades away, look at horizontal drilling. By then we'll have fusion. I'm just tired of hearing "peak oil" and people pluggin up their ears whenever someone mentions they're find more oil everyday, and that we have hundreds of years of oil shale as well
PinkElephant
not rated yet Oct 27, 2011
Peak oil is decades away, look at horizontal drilling.
A common misconception. Peak oil is already here. Right now.

Net production across the world is plateauing, even as the developing world's demand continues to grow exponentially (never mind that the world's overall population continues to expand, as well.)

http://en.wikiped...ces2.jpg
http://en.wikiped...gGap.jpg

That's the crux of peak oil. Peak oil is not about "the world running out of oil". It is about demand growing faster than supply, on a permanent and irreversible basis. Which in turn means, ever-escalating price of oil, and ever-greater drag on those economies that are vitally dependent on oil.