Measuring elusive neutrinos flowing through the Earth, physicists learn more about the sun
Using one of the most sensitive neutrino detectors on the planet, an international team including physicists Laura Cadonati and Andrea Pocar at the University of Massachusetts Amherst are now measuring the flow of solar neutrinos reaching earth more precisely than ever before. The detector probes matter at the most fundamental level and provides a powerful tool for directly observing the sun's composition.
Pocar, Cadonati and colleagues report in the current issue of Physical Review Letters that the Borexino instrument has now measured with high precision the flux of the beryllium seven (7Be) solar neutrino, abundant, low-energy particles once below the observable threshold. With this advance, they can now precisely study the behavior of solar neutrinos with kinetic energy below 1 megaelectron volt (MeV). Borexino scientists also recently reported the first observation of neutrinos produced in a little-studied solar nuclear process known as proton-electron-proton, or pep, and set of stringent limit on reactions involving carbon, nitrogen and oxygen (the CNO cycle) in the sun.
Cadonati says, "Borexino is the only detector capable of observing the entire spectrum of solar neutrinos at once. Our results, the culmination of 20 years of research, greatly narrow the observation precision. The data confirm the neutrino oscillations, flavor changes and flow predicted by models of the sun and particle physics."
Of particular interest, Pocar and Cadonati note, is the Borexino instrument's ability to more thoroughly test neutrino oscillation parameters, allowing an exploration of their characteristic non-zero mass, which does not fit the Standard Model of particle physics. "Our data can tell us about fundamental micro physics at the particle level," says Cadonati. "Borexino is using neutrinos to explore the interior of the sun, looking for new, exciting clues to the mysteries of the universe we cannot see." Pocar adds, "Our detector provides stringent tests of the three-neutrino oscillations model."
Solar neutrinos are produced in nuclear processes and radioactive decays of several elements during fusion reactions at the sun's core. As many as 65 billion of them stream out of the sun and hit every square centimeter of the earth's surface [or 420 billion every square inch] every second. But because they only interact through the nuclear weak force they pass through matter unaffected, making them very difficult to detect and to distinguish from the trace nuclear decays of ordinary materials. The weak force is one of the four fundamental forces of nature, with gravity, electromagnetism and the strong force. It is responsible for the radioactive decay of unstable subatomic particles, with a short range of influence, about 1 percent of the diameter of a typical atomic nucleus.
The Borexino instrument, housed far beneath Italy's Apennine Mountains, detects neutrinos as they interact with an ultra-pure organic liquid scintillator at the center of a large sphere surrounded by 2,000 tons of water. Its great depth and many onion-like protective layers maintain the core as the most radiation-free medium on the planet.
There are three neutrino types, or "flavors": electron, muon and tau. Those produced in the sun are the electron type. As they travel away from their birthplace, they oscillate, or change from one flavor to another. A detector like Borexino can observe all three types in real time and measures each one's energy, but it cannot distinguish between them. It's more sensitive to the electron type so they are more likely to be seen.
The 7Be neutrino flux now being detected by Borexino is predicted by the standard solar model to make up about 10 percent of solar flow, Cadonati says. Earlier instruments in Canada and Japan designed to detect higher-energy neutrinos had already observed evidence of their flavor oscillations, probing 1/10,000 of the solar neutrino flux and their oscillations as they travel through solar matter. However, without data in the low-energy range as scanned by Borexino, physicists were not able to confirm the specific energy-dependent effect of solar neutrino oscillations. Borexino has now filled this gap and for the first time observed evidence of neutrino oscillation in vacuum, as they travel between the sun and Earth.
Pocar says that from the astrophysics angle, Borexino's ability to conduct "precision physics" experiments and collect a large number of observations, with concomitant higher statistical power, is yielding data that show how our sun works. As for the possibility of discovering a new kind of neutrino coming from the sun, which is allowed by some theoretical extensions to the Standard Model of particle physics, he adds, "You always have the hope of seeing surprises, some small deviation from the expectations. And this you can only have if your accuracy and precision are good enough to see very small variations."
In a companion paper, the Borexino team says their 7Be solar neutrino flux measurements show no flow differences between day and night. Some had hypothesized that one might exist because neutrinos pass through the earth's bulk at night. But Pocar says, "The traverse through the earth seems not to change neutrinos' flavor."
In the future, the researchers hope to identify the origin of every neutrino type coming from the sun, particularly to assess the relative levels of carbon, nitrogen and oxygen there, to deepen understanding of how the sun evolved and how its workings are related to that of larger stars.
Provided by University of Massachusetts at Amherst
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
3 comments
-
Water flow question
3 hours ago
-
[Drift velocity] Factors affecting velocity
6 hours ago
-
does cold gasoline have less energy
6 hours ago
-
distribution of molecules throughout the atmosphere
8 hours ago
-
The Global Positioning System !
9 hours ago
-
A Question relating Power
10 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
May 25, 2012 |
4.3 / 5 (22) |
50
|
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (7) |
15
|
Hawaii lab turns laser-powered bubbles into microrobots
(Phys.org) -- A team of scientists from the University of Hawaii are working on microrobots created from bubbles of air in a saline solution. The bubbles take on their title of robots as a laser ...
Sound increases the efficiency of boiling
Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...
May 24, 2012 |
5 / 5 (2) |
2
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
Same gene that stunts infants' growth also makes them grow too big: research
UCLA geneticists have identified the mutation responsible for IMAGe* syndrome, a rare disorder that stunts infants' growth. The twist? The mutation occurs on the same gene that causes Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, which makes ...
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (8)
I've always found that to be utterly amazing - that we're living in a vast ocean of neutrinos moving through us at light speed.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (10)
What, absolutely no evidence for a solar-mass pulsar??? Must have something to do with Henry Kissinger and Chairman Mao. They knew we couldn't handle the truth, I guess. I know the truth because I've seen the "secret" cables revealed at this very website!
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
http://www.physor...660.html
Of course, such explanation doesn't requite the omatur's "neutron repulsion" hypothesis, as the Solar core generates the neutrinos with common nuclear reactions. I liked this model a lot - but the recent findings of superluminal neutrino speed violates it a bit. Why? The speed of primordial neutrinos shouldn't exceed the escape velocity from Sun (~ 570 km/sec), or these neutrinos couldn't form a dense coat around Sun. So I'm forced to rethink this model a bit.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
IMO the neutrinos are behaving like tiny bubbles of space-time and they can influence the speed of nuclear reactions significantly. The nuclear fusion requires the temporal formation of thin neck with strongly negative curvature, which is thermodynamically unfavourable situation. When some neutrino will fly through such place, it could initiate the formation of such neck like the catalyst. The influence of neutrinos to the speed of nuclear reactions is surprisingly intensive, it could be even sensitive to neutrino oscillations inside of atom nuclei.
http://www.nature...64a.html
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
I find this statement a little puzzling. If it observes all three in real time and measures each one's energy, what other information would they need to distinguish between the three types?
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
What "spaceprobes" are you referring to? A 2008 study of the RTGs aboard the Cassini probe in route to Saturn found: "No significant deviations from exponential decay are observed over a range of 0.7 - 1.6 A.U. A 90% Cl upper limit of 0.84 x 10^-4 is set on a term in the decay rate of Pu-238 proportional to 1/R^2 and 0.99 x 10^-4 for a term proportional to 1/R."
http://arxiv.org/...48v1.pdf
Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that the reality of variable radioactive decay rates is in dispute and as of now no unequivocal evidence of such a decay mode exists (and several studies, including the one I noted above, find no evidence of it).
Even Fischbach et al conclude more study is needed to confirm or refute their controversial findings.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
They measure energy, NOT flavor.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
The same applies to recent OPERA results: this study is indeed suspicios as such - but we have other (at least three) independent indicia. Mainstream science is strictly deterministic - if doesn't work well with distributed, emergent evidence. It tends to ignore, until it finds the strong reproducible connection - such connection indeed becomes often misleading and it cannot be extrapolated at the case of weak, emergent dependencies. I'd say, the physics at present stage of human understanding evolution should be handled rather like the detective story.
Oct 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
But with increasing distance from human observer scale the Universe isn't so regular anymore. The large stars are oval, the galaxies are flat or of irregular shape and the galactic cluster are completely random. The appearance of Universe changes into fuzzy quantum object again. Under such a situation the reductionist approach based on deterministic rigor doesn't work well anymore: the mainstream physics changes into landscape of many overlapping theories. A more reliable predictions would be based on distributed evidence there.
Oct 08, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
A Nobel Prize surely for anyone who comes up with a house-sized or smaller neutrino detector!