Chimpanzee studies suggest speech perception not a uniquely human trait

Oct 31, 2011

We all know that experience is a powerful teaching tool: practice remodels neural connections and leads to mastery. Now scientists suggest that it is early experience with language—and not special innate cognitive ability—that allows human beings to process and perceive speech while their closest evolutionary relatives, chimpanzees, do not.

Traditionally, the brain has been thought to be uniquely adapted to perceive and process speech patterns, a trait widely regarded as an evolutionary phenomenon separating humans from other primates. However, a 25-year-old language-trained chimp named Panzee has recently demonstrated the ability to interpret highly distorted speech sounds in a similar manner to humans. These data provide evidence that the capacity for speech perception may have existed in a common ancestor. Under this theory, it is not that chimpanzees in the wild lack the perceptual apparatus to understand human language. Rather, they don’t develop speech because they lack experience using their capacity for it. They need practice.

“I think our results just reinforce the fact that experience matters. Humans maybe do not perceive speech because they are human, but instead because of the tremendous amount of experience they have with it from birth”, explains Lisa Heimbauer, a Ph.D. candidate and researcher at Georgia State University’s Language Research Center. The team will present its findings Nov. 1 at the American Acoustical Society meeting in San Diego.

Heimbauer and her colleagues, Drs. Michael Owren and Michael Beran, also of Georgia State University, had an ideal subject in Panzee. Raised by humans since she was eight days old, Panzee was exposed to the English language early, as if she were a human baby. She is proficient in understanding more than 130 English words and also recognizes words in sine-wave form, a type of synthetic speech that reduces language to three whistle-like tones.

Understanding language even when highly distorted is a specialized capacity once attributed only to humans. However, like humans, Panzee processes words even when they are lacking many of the traditional cues present in normal speech. Now, similar to the 13 humans in the study, Panzee has also shown better recognition of these synthesized words when the first two sine-wave tones were present than when one of these was absent. This suggests that Panzee is relying upon the same information present in sine-wave speech that is used by humans for language recognition of words in this form.

This research may help scientists better understand the mechanisms used by young children to process and produce speech. “If nonhumans given a richer, early speech experience can show human-like , it suggests that impairments may not be related to problems in specialized circuits,” Heimbauer suggests. It’s an insight that could ultimately lead to a better understanding of why some children have hearing and deficits.

Explore further: Researchers find fish 'yells' to be heard over human made noise

Provided by American Institute of Physics

5 /5 (5 votes)

Related Stories

'Motherese' important for children's language development

May 06, 2011

(Medical Xpress) -- Talking to children has always been fundamental to language development, but new research reveals that the way we talk to children is key to building their ability to understand and create ...

When do babies develop a love of speech?

Feb 20, 2006

Is the newborn preference for speech innate, developed in utero or acquired during the early days post-partum? McGill University psychologist Dr Athena Vouloumanos says she's broken the uterine sound barrier ...

Linking reading to voice recognition

Jul 29, 2011

When people recognize voices, part of what helps make voice recognition accurate is noticing how people pronounce words differently. But individuals with dyslexia don't experience this familiar language advantage, ...

Language learning influenced by genes

Feb 11, 2011

Researchers at the University of Edinburgh have found a gene - called ROBO1 - linked to the mechanism in the brain that helps infants develop speech.

Recommended for you

Field study shows how sailfish use their bill to catch fish

13 hours ago

(Phys.org) —A large team of European researchers has finally revealed the purpose of the long, thin, needle-like bill sported by the famous sailfish. It's used, they report in their paper published in Proceedings of ...

Explainer: How do homing pigeons navigate?

13 hours ago

Pigeons have extraordinary navigational abilities. Take a pigeon from its loft and let it go somewhere it has never been before and it will, after circling in the sky for while, head home. This remarkable ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Squirrel
1 / 5 (2) Oct 31, 2011
That chimps and other nonhuman animal can hear speech is not new and rather "old hat". The field I thought had moved on to the real difference which is speech production. No other animal can control vocalization like humans--birds have a different respiratory system to mammals. The suggested implications that the "new" found evidence for chimps hear speech might be relevant for speech impairment in children is just to aid get grants. Newly all speech problems in children is related directly or indirectly to deficits in speech production.
Isaacsname
2 / 5 (1) Oct 31, 2011
My own experiences tell me that animals communicate a great deal more with body language, but also, more importantly, with facial expressions. Just like they are unfamiliar with spoken human language, but capable given training, we are unfamiliar with non-human faces, but also just as capable, given practice. However, this is almost completely overlooked, why ? I don't know.

Especially eye contact. There's a reason why we look at faces, not feet. If you really want to " speak " to an animal in a language it can understand, you look it in the eyes.

Vendicar_Decarian
5 / 5 (1) Oct 31, 2011
This is all fine and good for apes. But what about their Republican progenitors?

More news stories