BP, Transocean, Halliburton cited for violations

Oct 13, 2011
Oil from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, can be seen in the water on Orange Beach, Alabama, in 2010. US oil industry regulators slapped BP, Transocean and Halliburton with regulatory violations notices in what is expected to lead to massive fines associated with the deadly 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

The US government slapped BP, Transocean and Halliburton with citations for violating oil industry regulations in what is expected to lead to massive fines for the deadly 2010 oil spill.

The decision to also cite BP's subcontractors could strengthen the British energy giant's for recovering some of the multi-billion dollar costs of the spill from Halliburton, which performed the cement job, and drilling rig owner .

"The issuance today of notices of non-compliance to BP, Transocean and Halliburton makes clear that contractors, like operators, are responsible for properly conducting their deepwater drilling activities and are accountable to the US government and the American public for their conduct," BP said in a statement.

"We continue to encourage other parties, including Transocean and Halliburton, to acknowledge their responsibilities in the accident, make changes to help prevent similar accidents in the future, and step forward to fulfill their obligations to Gulf communities."

Halliburton said it "believes it is fully indemnified by BP against any loss resulting from the Macondo incident and any penalties arising from the violations alleged by BSEE" (the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement.)

"Halliburton will continue to work with BSEE and is committed to full and open cooperation with regulatory officials," it added in a statement.

A Transocean spokesman contacted by AFP noted that "BP agreed to assume full responsibility for the costs and liability of any pollution, contamination and caused by hydrocarbons that leaked from the Macondo well."

"That contract indemnifies Transocean against all such claims," spokesman Lou Colasuonno said, adding that the Swiss group "intends to appeal the citations."

It was the first time that regulators issued the violation notice -- called an Incidents of Non-Compliance (INC) -- directly to a contractor that was not the well's operator.

The decision "reflects the severity of the incident and the government's commitment to holding all parties accountable," the agency said in a statement.

File photo of a Halliburton stand at an expo in Manama, Bahrain. A US government decision to hit Halliburton with citations for violating regulations could strengthen BP's giant's legal case for recovering some of the multi-billion dollar costs of the 2010 Gulf oil spill.

It comes after the regulatory agency issued a report in September which spread the blame for the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, citing a bad cement job, poor management by BP and its subcontractors and risky shortcuts.

The findings were largely in line with other investigations into the 2010 disaster.

The US Justice Department is also conducting a criminal investigation into the deadly disaster which killed 11 workers aboard Transocean's Deepwater Horizon on April 20, 2010.

By the time the well was capped 87 days later, 4.9 million barrels (206 million gallons) of oil had gushed out of the runaway well 5,000 feet (1,500 meters) below the surface of the Gulf of Mexico.

BP -- which leased the rig and was ultimately responsible for operations -- has spent $40.7 billion on the biggest maritime oil spill in history and could still be liable for billions in fines, compensation and restoration costs.

The companies have 60 days to respond to the 15 citations issued by the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement.

All three companies were accused of failing to "protect health, safety, property, and the environment by failing to perform all operations in a safe and workmanlike manner," failing to "take measures to prevent unauthorized discharge of pollutants into offshore waters" and failing to "take necessary precautions to keep the well under control at all times."

BP and Halliburton were also cited for failing to properly cement the well while BP and Transocean were cited for failing to maintain the blowout preventer.

was also cited for failing to "conduct an accurate pressure integrity test" and to obtain approval of the temporary well abandonment procedures that were actually used.

Explore further: US plans widespread seismic testing of sea floor

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US report spreads blame for BP oil spill

Sep 14, 2011

A key US government report spreads the blame for the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico Wednesday, citing a bad cement job and poor management decisions by BP and its subcontractors.

BP sues Gulf rig firm, shifting blame for oil spill

Apr 21, 2011

BP is taking legal action to shift the blame for the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster which devastated the environment and the group's image a year ago, suing rig operator Transocean for damages of $40 billion ...

US Coast Guard slams Transocean

Apr 23, 2011

The US Coast Guard slammed drilling rig operator Transocean's "poor safety culture" in a report Friday on the massive explosion and fire that unleashed the biggest maritime oil spill in history.

BP could have prevented blowout: investigator

Feb 17, 2011

BP's oil well in the Gulf of Mexico might never have blown last year if the company's engineers had been consulted about a key test that pointed to a defective cement job, investigators reported Thursday.

Commission won't be last word on Gulf oil spill

Jan 06, 2011

(AP) -- A presidential commission's conclusion on the largest offshore oil spill in history that decisions meant to save time and money created an unreasonable amount of risk won't be the final word on the ...

Recommended for you

US plans widespread seismic testing of sea floor

12 hours ago

(AP)—The U.S. government is planning to use sound blasting to conduct research on the ocean floor along most of the East Coast, using technology similar to that which led to a court battle by environmentalists in New Jersey.

Fire ecology manipulation by California native cultures

12 hours ago

Before the colonial era, 100,000s of people lived on the land now called California, and many of their cultures manipulated fire to control the availability of plants they used for food, fuel, tools, and ritual. Contemporary ...

User comments : 0