Austrian glaciers shrink dramatically

This melting is just theory. How do we know that their meter sticks didn't get 7 percent longer from the previous year and that as a result the glacier stayed the same size?

Answer me that Mr. Scientist.

What a bunch of hogwash. Australia doesn't have glaciers - it's the 2nd driest and hottest contenent on earth!

Answer me that Mr. Scientist.

It's all just natural cycles. The unnaturalness is completely natural, you're just too brainwashed by the greenies to realize it. :P

What a bunch of hogwash. Australia doesn't have glaciers - it's the 2nd driest and hottest contenent on earth!

I can't quite decide: is that a bad pun, dyslexia, or a bad dyslexic pun?

@ohmytumor,

I'm starting to report your posts as "abuse" from here on. Not only are you off-topic, you're now cross-posting (copy-pasting) the same garbage across multiple threads. You've turned from an unhinged crank into an outright spammer.

Oh, as for:
"variable heat source": solar flares are the hidden truth?
[1]: economic fraud = scientific fraud?
[2]: What they call "pulsar" is not what you think, as is OBVIOUS from the five-sentence abstract.
[3]: more tooting of your own cranking horn.
[4]: Elvis? Really??

Just take your pills, and go back to whatever mental asylum you've escaped from.

Neutron stars don't disintegrate on their own. The galaxy does not contain less than 8 solar masses worth of material. No gas can be present next to a neutron star at non-relativistic velocities, without falling onto the neutron star and becoming part of it.

Your grasp of physics does not even begin to approach your grasp of your children's genitals. Begone, troll.

It's interesting, while the global atmosphere temperatures are stagnating, the global warming - as measured with shrinkage of glaciers and temperature of oceans - still continues with original rate. IMO it could serve as an indicia of my theory of geovolcanic origin of global warming triggered with neutrinos.

http://www.scienc...3301.htm

@Callippo,

the global atmosphere temperatures are stagnating

Please explain where, in the actual data, do you see any evidence of "stagnating":

http://data.giss..../graphs/

It's interesting, while the global atmosphere temperatures are stagnating, the global warming - as measured with shrinkage of glaciers and temperature of oceans - still continues with original rate.

Ice and cold water serve as a temporary heat sink for the excess heat.

Do not be deceived. Just because the "temperature" rise may level off doesn't mean it isn't getting "hotter". The specifice heat capacity of water is higher than air, and the heat of melting of water is around 80 times the specific heat capacity of water.

Once all the ice melts, the ocean temperatures and air temperatures will rise much faster: around 80 times faster, actually...

Do not be deceived. Just because the "temperature" rise may level off

As pointed out above, there is no actual evidence of any such leveling off. So it is quite unclear at the moment, who is being deceived, vs. trying to perpetrate deception.

Once all the ice melts, the ocean temperatures and air temperatures will rise much faster: around 80 times faster

Not really. Yes, phase transitions are a constant-temperature process but most of Earth is not covered by ice.

Once all the glaciers are gone, the resultant more rapid warming may manifest in the high latitudes (though I doubt any factor approaching 80 would come into play -- partly because those are HIGH latitudes, receiving relatively little sun in the first place.)

In the mid-to-low latitudes, the effect is probably negligible, as there isn't THAT much heat transport to/from the poles relative to direct gain from the Sun and loss of heat to space.

Earth's annual mean albedo will be changed by around 10% by the time all the ice melts.

AT 1.5 meter/second flow rate, it takes around 80 days for warm water to flow from the tropical region to the arctic, which is part of the reason the peak of melt season is offset by an entire season from the longest day of the year.

The circulation of ocean water is colder on the NE side of basins in the N hemisphere because cold, melted water flows south from the melted ice.

As we heat up, isotherms on the W side of basins stretch farther and farther N, but the easter side of the basins lags behind, because of the buffer of ice in the N oceans.

Whenever the ice is gone, this buffer will be gone, and the isotherms will even out more and more. The water temps on the E. Atlantic will end up being about the same as the temps on the W. atlantic at the same lattitude.

I'm talking maybe 2045, several years after first complete sea ice melt down (minus any greenland calving...)

What a bunch of hogwash. Australia doesn't have glaciers - it's the 2nd driest and hottest contenent on earth!

look closer. its austria, not australia.

The Spammer strikes again. How many threads this time?

Space.com did no such thing. That article did not support you in anyway. For that matter neither have you.

So just how do Neutron Stars form when neutron repulsion is alleged by you to be so powerful that it stops Black Holes from forming no matter how large the mass?

Ignoring the question won't magically make you right Oliver. The ideas are contradictory and I bet even the Plasma Universe Cranks can see that now that it has been pointed out.

Ethelred

Oliver, do you not know of phase 2 of the plan? see kissinger and nixon knew about neutron repulsion and it being the main source of the suns and the universes power but chairman mao did not. as the world all followed their lead in the conspiracy they said it was to prevent nuclear war. however under the guise of that the united states had different reasons. as the climatoligists/scientists destroy our economy and power while funneling money to third world nations for supportung the scam the chinese will soon grow too strong and overpopulated for anyone but the us to even have a chance of stopping the chinese from taking over the world, at that moment neutron repulsion will be officially "discovered" and cheap easy neutron repulsion energy will be used both to power production of weapons and supplies and as weapons of mass destruction themselves in neutron repulsion bombs. saving the united states and allowing us to finally take over the whole world without looking like the bad guys...

oliver seems to suffer from neuron logic repulsion

where, in the actual data, do you see any evidence of "stagnating"

http://www.dailym...sts.html
http://www.telegr...ion.html
http://www.the9bi...erosols/
http://www.scient...g-slowed
http://www.scient...-warming
etc..