Australian court bans sales of Samsung Galaxy tab

Oct 13, 2011 By KRISTEN GELINEAU , Associated Press
People walk by a Samsung store in Sydney, Thursday, Oct. 13, 2011. An Australian court temporarily banned Samsung from selling its new Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet computer in the country, after rival technology giant Apple accused the company of copying features from its popular iPad tablet. (AP Photo/Rick Rycroft)

A court has temporarily banned Samsung from selling its new Galaxy tablet computer in Australia, another setback for the South Korean electronics giant in a global patent battle with Apple Inc. that accuses it of slavishly copying the iPad and iPhone.A court has temporarily banned Samsung from selling its new Galaxy tablet computer in Australia, another setback for the South Korean electronics giant in a global patent battle with Apple Inc. that accuses it of slavishly copying the iPad and iPhone.

Federal Court Justice Annabelle Bennett on Thursday granted a temporary injunction against sales of Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia. The decision prevents Samsung Electronics Co. from selling the device in Australia in its current form until a further court order, or until a pending patent lawsuit between the warring technology giants is resolved.

The ruling is a blow for Samsung, which had hoped to launch the new product in time for Christmas sales. It comes after courts in other countries including Germany and the Netherlands made judgments that upheld Apple's claims that its intellectual property had been appropriated by Samsung.

The patent battle spanning 10 countries has underlined the perception of Samsung as an efficient imitator among technology companies rather than a pace setter. Over the years, the company has grown to become the global No. 1 in TVs and No. 2 in smartphones by sales. But unlike archrival Apple Inc., it has not mesmerized consumers with its originality and innovation.

In April, Cupertino, California-based Apple Inc. sued Samsung in the United States, alleging the product design, user interface and packaging of Samsung's Galaxy devices "slavishly copy" the iPhone and iPad.

Suwon, South Korea-based Samsung Electronics Co. fought back with lawsuits of its own, accusing Apple of patent infringement of its wireless telecommunications technology.

Apple filed the Australian lawsuit in July, accusing Samsung of copying its touch screen technology. In her ruling Thursday, Bennett said she was granting the temporary injunction in part because she felt Apple had a sufficient likelihood of winning the trial against Samsung.

The judge's full orders will not be published until Friday. It was not immediately clear whether Samsung could - or would - attempt to sell a variation of the device that removed the features Apple objected to in the Australian lawsuit.

"We are disappointed with this ruling and Samsung will be seeking legal advice on its options," Samsung said in a statement. "Samsung will continue its legal proceeding against Apple's claim in order to ensure our innovative products remain available to consumers."

Samsung, which filed its Australian countersuit in September, said it remained confident it could prove Apple violated its wireless technology patents.

"We will continue to legally assert our intellectual property rights against those who violate Samsung's patents and free ride on our technology," the company said in a statement.

An attorney for Apple declined to comment after the hearing.

Samsung shares fell 0.9 percent to 890,000 won in Seoul.

Explore further: Apple's fiscal 3Q earnings top analyst forecasts

1 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Samsung files lawsuits against Apple

Apr 22, 2011

(AP) -- South Korea's Samsung Electronics Co. says it sued Apple Inc. for patent rights violations, only days after Apple sued Samsung for the same reason. ...

Samsung and Apple 'distance apart', court hears

Oct 04, 2011

Samsung and Apple Inc are yet to reach a deal which would permit the South Korean firm to sell its tablet computers in Australia, and are "a considerable distance apart", a court heard Tuesday.

Samsung files patent complaint against Apple in France

Sep 12, 2011

South Korea's Samsung Electronics said Monday it had filed a complaint in France against its US rival Apple for infringement of three mobile phone technology patents in its iPhone and iPad tablet computers.

Samsung vows counter-action over Apple patent suit

Apr 19, 2011

Samsung Electronics said Tuesday it would take counter-action against Apple after the US firm filed suit alleging that the South Korean giant copied its smartphones and tablet computers. ...

Recommended for you

Apple's fiscal 3Q earnings top analyst forecasts

7 hours ago

Apple's growth prospects are looking brighter as anticipation builds for the upcoming release of the next iPhone, a model that is expected to cater to consumers yearning for a bigger screen.

Verizon 2Q profit rises 93 percent

15 hours ago

Verizon reported Tuesday that its second-quarter earnings nearly doubled after it secured full ownership of Verizon Wireless.

Ex-Qualcomm exec pleads guilty to insider trading

Jul 21, 2014

A former high-ranking executive of US computer chip giant Qualcomm pleaded guilty Monday to insider trading charges, including trades on a 2011 deal for Atheros Communications, officials said.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Turritopsis
5 / 5 (2) Oct 13, 2011
http://www.youtub...amp;NR=1

Maybe Apple isn't as original as they are given credit for.
infiniteMadness
3.7 / 5 (3) Oct 13, 2011
im not an Apple fanboy at all, infact quite the contrary - but come on you cant take away Apple's design ideas based on a science fiction serie from the 80ies.

You wanna sue me for learning how to use a spoon when I was 3 years old? Pathetic.
leptonsoup337
5 / 5 (2) Oct 13, 2011
So I´m sure iPad is paying Gene Roddenberry´s estate royalties for the concept, right? Original my left foot. A number of people predicted that this type of PADD-like device (yes, two d´s, check MemoryAlpha) would show up shortly after their appearance on TNG and low and behold, we got PDAs. iPad-like devices are a simply an continuation of this concept. Crying to the courts about how original the iPad is disingenuous at best and attempt to establish a stranglehold on the market at worst. I´m guess the latter is more probable.
Gezza
not rated yet Oct 13, 2011
Bullshit! That's all I can say.
Gezza
5 / 5 (1) Oct 13, 2011
The Apple is definitely ROTTEN. Not only do they remove choice from their own customers, they are also removing my right to choose. They are taking away my right to buy something that I have the freedom to do with what I like. Where I own the hardware and software. Try doing that with an Apple product. Apple just comes across as a Communist Dictatorship. "You're all equal. So long as you do it our way!"
Nanobanano
5 / 5 (1) Oct 13, 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZyY35Kt-lI&NR=1

Maybe Apple isn't as original as they are given credit for.


Yep.

Gene Roddenberry invented the modern concept of hand held computers, and of course that isn't even the only hand held computer with a "sleek" design seen in Star Trek: The Next Generation.

We saw many,many similar devices in TNG and Voyager over the years, 5, 10, 15 years before the first real pad devices came out.

This is a completely insane and absurd law suit, and just goes to show how patent laws and the courts world wide have hijacked the freedoms and development of scientific knowledge and technology.