Apollo astronaut returns 'stolen' camera

Oct 31, 2011 by Jason Major, Universe Today
Apollo 14 astronaut Ed Mitchell on the Moon, February 5, 1971. Credit: NASA.

In a follow-up to a recent Universe Today article, Apollo astronaut and sixth-man-on-the-moon Ed Mitchell has agreed to return a lunar Data Acquisition Camera (DAC) that he kept from the Apollo 14 mission, rather than face a court date next year over a suit filed by NASA in June.

The 16mm camera was “rescued” from the landing module by Mitchell as it was about to be released from the orbiter after the astronauts’ visit to the Moon in February 1971. The lander – with everything remaining in it – would later crash onto the Moon’s surface.

Not only did Mitchell consider it a waste of a valuable piece of historic equipment, but there was a then-standing policy that astronauts could keep certain items from their missions as mementos.

Mitchell had had the DAC until May 2010, when he put it and other items up for auction at New York’s Bonhams auction house as a part of their “Space History Sale”. It was at that time that filed a suit against the 80-year-old Mitchell, claiming that he had no rightful ownership of the camera. Mitchell’s attempt to get the case dismissed was denied by a Florida district judge earlier this month, who stated that there was no statute or jurisdiction on such cases, being filed by a federally-run organization.

This Data Acquisition Camera (DAC) was one of two 16mm cameras on the Apollo 14 lunar module "Antares" when it landed on the moon on Feb, 5, 1971. Credit: FLSD

Rather than go to court in October 2012, Mitchell agreed in district court this past Thursday to “relinquish all claims of ownership, legal title, or dominion” over the .

Mitchell and the federal prosecutors will each be responsible for their own legal fees.

Explore further: SpaceX close to figuring out rocket failure during launch

Related Stories

Looking at the volatile side of the Moon

Jun 01, 2011

Four decades after the first Moon landing, our only natural satellite remains a fascinating enigma. Specialists from Europe and the US have been looking at ESA’s proposed Lunar Lander mission to find ...

Space Adventures wants to fly you to the moon

May 06, 2011

Space Adventures – the company that brought the first space tourists to the International Space Station – has longer space tourist excursions planned for as early as 2015: a trip around the Moon. ...

One year of the moon in 2.5 minutes

Jun 15, 2011

We don’t always have the time or ability to see the Moon every night of the year, but this video, from the Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio, uses data from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter ...

Recommended for you

What is the newest planet?

7 hours ago

With astronomers discovering new planets and other celestial objects all the time, you may be wondering what the newest planet to be discovered is. Well, that depends on your frame of reference. If we are ...

Catching Earth at aphelion

7 hours ago

Do you feel a little… distant today? The day after the 4th of July weekend brings with it the promise of barbecue leftovers and discount fireworks. It also sees our fair planet at aphelion, or its farthest ...

Opportunity's 7th Mars winter to include new study area

7 hours ago

Operators of NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity plan to drive the rover into a valley this month where Opportunity will be active through the long-lived rover's seventh Martian winter, examining outcrops ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Temple
5 / 5 (1) Oct 31, 2011
Rather poor form by Mitchell to try to profit from selling it.

While I don't think you could say he owned this piece of government technology, I feel that Mitchell did indeed earn the right to keep this memento (which was going to be destroyed).

However, if he no longer wants it, it should be returned to NASA, not sold for profit by whomever 'borrowed' it.
NotAsleep
not rated yet Nov 01, 2011
Technically, the article didn't state where the profits would be going... one can only hope he was planning on donating the money to charity since it was part of an apparently organized Space History Sale.

If not, yes, poor form from an astronaut

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.