Is the true 'wisdom of the crowd' to copy successful individuals?

Sep 15, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- New research published today on crowd wisdom — the statistical phenomenon by which varied individual guesses produce uncannily accurate average answers — has shed light on why we have a bias to select experts in team settings.

The experiment was carried out at The Royal Veterinary College's annual Open Day in May this year when RVC researchers asked prospective students and their families to guess the number of sweets in a jar. The average guesses of 82 who guessed in isolation came within just one sweet of the true quantity.

However, in the real-world people have access to public information, so the researchers re-ran the experiment but told people what others had guessed. Whether the researchers provided the last person’s guess, the mean guess, or a random guess, collective plummeted.  

In fact, individuals with access to public information over-estimated the number of sweets in the jar, resembling information cascades that result in economic bubbles where people drive prices of items (e.g. stocks) above their value.
Use of public information did prove to be beneficial however, when individuals were given access to the current best guess. This reduced the likelihood of extreme predictions, and individuals in this test both performed better individually and collectively at smaller group sizes than the other conditions studied.

Researchers suggest that this finding may offer an explanation as to why people have a bias to recruit and follow successful individuals in team settings: individuals are more accurate, and the is smart too.

Lead researcher Dr. Andrew King, Research Fellow at the Royal Veterinary College, commented: "We are bombarded by other people’s judgements – from our friends, colleagues, and the media. Such a flood of information can result in a convergence of opinion, creating overconfidence (and inaccuracy). What our work demonstrates is that for accurate collective decisions, you either aggregate completely independent opinions, or copy successful individuals; anything in-between seems doomed to failure."

Explore further: Why plants in the office make us more productive

More information: The paper 'Is the True 'Wisdom of the Crowd' to Copy Successful Individuals?' is published in Biology Letters: dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0795

Provided by The Royal Veterinary College

5 /5 (5 votes)

Related Stories

Study finds that diversity can trump ability

Apr 21, 2011

Dr Dick James from the Department of Physics at the University of Bath, UK, working with other colleagues from Germany and the UK, has found that decision making among groups can be significantly better than ...

How wise are crowds?

Nov 17, 2010

The rise of the Internet has sparked a fascination with what The New Yorker’s financial writer James Surowiecki called, in a book of the same name, "The wisdom of crowds": The idea that aggregating or ave ...

Getting in sync with IM proves profitable for investors

Mar 18, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- New research suggests that stock market day traders are more successful when they get in sync with their colleagues via IM, than are those who do not. This phenomenon, known as syncing, has ...

Recommended for you

Precarious work schedules common among younger workers

Aug 29, 2014

One wish many workers may have this Labor Day is for more control and predictability of their work schedules. A new report finds that unpredictability is widespread in many workers' schedules—one reason ...

Girls got game

Aug 29, 2014

Debi Taylor has worked in everything from construction development to IT, and is well and truly socialised into male-dominated workplaces. So when she found herself the only female in her game development ...

Computer games give a boost to English

Aug 28, 2014

If you want to make a mark in the world of computer games you had better have a good English vocabulary. It has now also been scientifically proven that someone who is good at computer games has a larger ...

Saddam Hussein—a sincere dictator?

Aug 28, 2014

Are political speeches manipulative and strategic? They could be – when politicians say one thing in public, and privately believe something else, political scientists say. Saddam Hussein's legacy of recording private discussions ...

User comments : 0