A true bargain house: First prototype built from MIT’s effort to construct houses for $1,000 each

September 15, 2011 by Peter Dizikes

A true bargain house: First prototype built from MIT’s effort to construct houses for $1,000 each

Enlarge

The interior of the house designed by Ying chee Chui as part of MIT's 1K House project.

Home prices in many of the world’s most famous cities run to well over $1,000 per square foot. By contrast, MIT architects have produced a decidedly more affordable alternative: the first prototype from the Institute’s “1K House” project, an effort to see if low-cost homes for the poor can be constructed for $1,000, total.

The prototype, called Pinwheel , was designed by Ying chee Chui MArch ’11, a graduate of MIT’s Department of Architecture, and has been constructed in Mianyang, in Sichuan Province, China.

“It’s part of the responsibility of an architect, to create these spaces for people to live,” Chui says. “It’s from the heart.”

Chui first designed Pinwheel House in 2009 as part of the design studio — essentially a class — that launched the 1K House effort. The project is particularly focused on affordable housing for areas hit by natural disasters, such as the 2008 earthquake in Sichuan. This prototype turned out to be more costly, at $5,925, but is still very inexpensive in relative terms.

The idea to attempt building $1,000 homes was first conceived by Tony Ciochetti, the Thomas G. Eastman Chair at MIT’s Center for Real Estate, and inspired by One Laptop Per Child, the foundation headed by MIT professor Nicholas Negroponte that brings low-cost computers to children.

“There is a huge proportion of the world’s population that has pressing housing needs,” says Ciochetti, who first got the idea for the initiative after seeing a family of four emerge from a tiny mud hut while he was traveling through rural India. Like One Laptop Per Child’s aim of developing $100 computers, Ciochetti adds, the idea of the $1,000 house is intended as a challenge to designers: “Can you build affordable, sustainable shelter for such a large population?”

Pinwheel and courtyard

Chui’s house is one of 13 plans that emerged from the first 1K House design studio, in 2009. It features hollow brick walls with steel bars for reinforcement, wooden box beams, and is intended to withstand a magnitude 8.0 earthquake.

The Pinwheel House prototype was more expensive to build partly because it is larger than Chui’s original design — about 800 square feet, rather than 500 square feet. The smaller version of the house could be built for about $4,000, says Chui, now an architectural practitioner in New York City. That figure could be still lower if a large number of the homes were built at once, she adds.

In any case, the central design concept of Pinwheel House is the same: It has a modular layout, with rectangular room units surrounding a central courtyard space. “The module can be duplicated and rotated, and then it becomes a house,” Chui says. “The construction is easy enough, because if you know how to build a single module, you can build the whole house.”

A true bargain house: First prototype built from MIT’s effort to construct houses for $1,000 each
Enlarge

The exterior of the house.

Yung Ho Chang, a professor of architectural design at MIT who helped oversee the 2009 1K House design studio, thinks the prototype has fulfilled the promise of Chui’s design. “The house Chee built has good ventilation and good light,” Chang says.

Chang, for his part, is originally from China, and runs an independent practice there, Atelier FCJZ. He was attracted to the 1K House project, in part, by the shortage of good housing in some parts of his native country.

“After the earthquake, this project came as a natural thing to do,” Chang says. “It’s not just about how cheap the house is, but if it’s decent. When you look at living conditions in parts of China, India and Africa, they don’t meet the basic standards of what we think of as real housing.”

From $1K to $10K?

The 1K House project has proven successful enough, and attracted enough attention, that Chang is overseeing a related MIT design studio this fall, along with a number of outside collaborators. This one aims to create a series of home designs, intended for Japan, which would cost $10,000 to build. Participants in the studio include architects and designers from Tokyo University, the Japanese architecture firm Tsushima Design Studio, Atelier FCJZ, the Japanese retailer Muji, and Vanke, a real estate development firm in China.

“The idea of the 1K house is very much about how could we, as architects in research institutions like MIT, work on world poverty,” Chang says. “This semester, the mission is more about how design could reach a bigger percentage of the population, in the middle class.”

The new design studio also aims to create homes that could be built inexpensively following natural disasters, such as the earthquake and tsunami that struck northern Japan in March. Rebuilding in such situations, Chang says, often entails three stages of construction: the creation of temporary shelters, then stronger temporary homes sturdy enough for winter weather, and then permanent replacements for damaged or destroyed buildings.

During that process, Chang says, “there are a lot of resources wasted, including energy.” Alternately, he suggests, inexpensive and simple houses built from an existing template could let countries rebuild more quickly with practical, permanent structures.

The use of inexpensive housing for rebuilding is, in part, why architects in Japan are now engaging with the project. The initiative “is an important step in the realization of rapid/permanent community building,” says Andrew Wit, an architect with Tsushima Design Studio, responding to questions by email. After disasters, he adds, “the government very quickly builds shelters to house all of those affected by the events, but these cheap housing types have very short lifespans and are also made at very low quality standards … But the [MIT house project] asks if it is possible to utilize new technologies and processes for the quick creation of housing equal to or higher then the typical quality standards which are currently seen in Japan.”

Plenty of hurdles remain before any home can be manufactured for $1,000 or less. “If it were easy, somebody would have done it,” Ciochetti says.

But ultimately, Chang hopes, convening further studios in the vein of the 1K House project will allow more designs to move from the drawing board and onto solid ground. “The inexpensive laptop got to be more than an idea, it became available for children,” Chang says. “I hope one day we’ll be in the same position.”


This story is republished courtesy of MIT News (http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/), a popular site that covers news about MIT research, innovation and teaching.

Provided by Massachusetts Institute of Technology search and more info website

4.9 /5 (10 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

mrtea
Sep 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Well done!
CHollman82
Sep 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Why don't you just use rapid prototyping to build the whole thing, including built in plumbing lines, sinks, toilets, shower/bath, shelves and cabinets, etc molded right into the walls... the first one built would be expensive but if you mechanize the process and amortize the cost of the machinery over tens of thousands of units they could be built very cheaply. Of course they would be bare, and rather light weight. They would need to be furnished by the occupants with whatever they could afford or get their hands on and weighed down or fastened to the ground somehow... still better than a mud hut.
RustyMustard
Sep 15, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (5)
Why don't you just use rapid prototyping to build the whole thing, including built in plumbing lines, sinks, toilets, shower/bath, shelves and cabinets, etc molded right into the walls... the first one built would be expensive but if you mechanize the process and amortize the cost of the machinery over tens of thousands of units they could be built very cheaply. Of course they would be bare, and rather light weight. They would need to be furnished by the occupants with whatever they could afford or get their hands on and weighed down or fastened to the ground somehow... still better than a mud hut.


Better than a mud hut? Mud is cheap,strong,well insulated and easy to build and maintain. How about working towards buildings that use smarter design with local materials?

Homes should be considered taking into account the region and it's resources. If the area's soil has high clay content, then build with mud brick, cob, or mud stone.
Nanobanano
Sep 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
RustyMustard:

um, brick, and especially "mud brick" are useless in earthquakes and tropical systems.

Anyone remember the Bam earthquake? What was it? 26,000 dead and that many more injured from mud brick construction that got pulverized in an earthquake that really wasn't all that big, relatively speaking.

http://en.wikiped...sualties

The mud brick makes sense there at first glance, because they get so little rainfall, but in an earthquake it is pulverized and turns to powder.

And of course, mud brick is eroded and washed away in a tropical cyclone or monsoonal trough.

Conventional "stick" homes and metal buildings, with a minimum of brick as facade or primary material, are currently the best technology for earthquake prone regions.

And we know from the U.S. east coast earthquake, and from New Zealand, that even modern brick buildings and brick facade doesn't hold up in even a relatively modest quake...
Nanobanano
Sep 15, 2011

Rank: 4.7 / 5 (3)
The Japan earthquake was a 9.0.

Chile quake was 8.8, half as powerful.

The recent u.s. east coast quake was a 5.-something, which is a million times weaker than the Japan quake.

Christchurch was a 6.1, I think, can't remember, but roughly 32,000 times smaller than the Japan quake.

But modern, FIRED brick facade, and certainly that above the first floor or in gabel ends, did not survive even the east coast quake, even with brick ties.

Seeing the carnage from brick facades falling to the ground and smashing cars, both in New Zealand and in the U.S., this actually made me conclude that building codes should be changed to ban brick facades above the first floor and ban them in the gable ends of houses in businesses also. They are too unstable in seismic events and end up causing most of the injuries, fatalities and secondary damages (i.e. two-story brick facade wall fell on a car below,) in quakes in the 5.0 to 6.0 range.

Mud brick is useless.

Brick facade is useless.
Nanobanano
Sep 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I would just also add that fired brick and/or cinder blocks is VERY good for tropical systems and tornados, but still very bad for earthquakes.
Mahal_Kita
Sep 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Yes.. Yes.. All your comments are true for the best part. But give those students a fair chance to graduate, huh? It's not like there studying for fun...
RustyMustard
Sep 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I'm not saying mud brick is the only solution, but in geologically stable regions with the RIGHT conditions, and built sensibly. There are mud-rock structures here locally that have been abandoned for the past hundred years at least, most likely longer that I shelter in when winter camping in the backcountry. A tarp over where the thatched roof was, and it's a cozy home again.

Would I build mud brick in earthquake country? No, nor would I build anything on a floodplain, or at sea level, or in a wetland, behind a levee, or in a place like california where there's natural fires and mudslides every year. No, i'd use some damn sense when I'm building and not do stupid things in disaster prone regions, duh! I agree, some people don't know better, but many of us do know better, or at least they should know better. It doesn't matter what you build, if you build in the wrong places, it's a disaster of your making. But then again western civilization is a disaster in itself.
Nanobanano
Sep 15, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
It doesn't matter what you build, if you build in the wrong places, it's a disaster of your making. But then again western civilization is a disaster in itself.


It's anything in the name of "freedom," even when it's detrimental to society as a whole.

Example, no body had any business making houses on the outer banks in the carolinas, even in the past, nevermind now that Irene has cut whole islands in half.

The entire area should have a build ban and be converted into a wildlife preserve or something.
RealScience
Sep 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Nano - Overall you are correct, but you are off in the factors.
Each point on the Richter scale is a factor of 10 in power.
8.8 would be 10^0.2 = ~1.6x less powerful than 9.0, not 2x.
If Christchurch was 6.1 that would be 10^(9.0-6.1) = 10^2.9 = ~800x less powerful, not 32,000x.
August's 'big' east coast quake was said to be 5.8, which is 1600 times less powerful, than 9.0, not a million times less powerful.
(Even a 5.0 would be only 10,000x less powerful, not a million times less powerful.)
stealthc
Sep 16, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
500 sq ft per person in some squalor shanty? Also, the configuration is a total waste of land. It should have a green roof at least make use of that space and free sunlight since the poor don't have oodles of cash to spend on overpriced supermarket food.
Rank 4.9 /5 (10 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Technology / Software

created 11 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 3

Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study

Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 3.6 / 5 (22) | comments 56 | with audio podcast

HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world

(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the company’s ultimate vision, successfully producing ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (16) | comments 17 | with audio podcast report

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Technology / Hi Tech & Innovation

created May 26, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 13 | with audio podcast report

Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22

Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (12) | comments 18


Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study

(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.

'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...