Senate saves the James Webb Space Telescope
September 15, 2011 By Jason Major
The 2012 fiscal year appropriation bill, marked up today by the Senate, allows for continued funding of the James Webb Space Telescope and support up to a launch in 2018! Yes, it looks like this bird is going to fly.
The James Webb Space Telescope will be the premier observatory of the next decade, serving thousands of astronomers worldwide. It will study every phase in the history of our Universe, ranging from the first luminous glows after the Big Bang, to the formation of solar systems capable of supporting life on planets like Earth, to the evolution of our own Solar System. JWST will be a large infrared telescope with a 6.5-meter primary mirror.
Thanks to everyone who contacted their representatives and expressed their support of the JWST, to all the websites out there that made it particularly simple to do so, and of course to all the state representatives who stood behind the program and didnt allow it to get mothballed. The space science community thanks you and the current and future generations of astronomers, physicists, cosmologists and explorers thank you.
In a spending bill that has less to spend, we naturally focus on the cuts and the things we cant do. But Id like to focus on what we can do. The bill invests more than $12 billion in scientific research and high impact research and technology development, to create new products and new jobs for the future," said CJS Subcommittee Chairwoman, Barbara Mikulski
In addition to continued funding for the telescope the 2012 bill also allots the National Aeronautics and Space Administration $17.9 billion (a reduction of $509 million or 2.8 percent from the 2011 enacted level) and preserves NASAs portfolio balanced among science, aeronautics, technology and human space flight investments, including the Orion Multipurpose Crew Vehicle, the heavy lift Space Launch System, and commercial crew development.
In this tighter economy, all of the agencies funded under the bill are also called on to be better stewards of taxpayers dollars, and waste and overspending will be much more closely monitored.
Read the bill summary here.
Source: Universe Today
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Distance of planets from stars and revolution
4 hours ago
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
2 hours ago |
5 / 5 (2) |
2
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
4 hours ago |
4 / 5 (1) |
11
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
4 hours ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (14) |
40
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Sep 15, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (8)
Sep 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
The James Webb is probably still on a short leash. I tried following the links; but, it didn't get me anywhere that looked like it was going to say anything.
Sep 15, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Sep 15, 2011
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (6)
Yeah, too bad there have not been record profits on wall st. to support modest tax increases on people who can afford it. (Oh, wait...tax increases will stifle job growth...no tax increases, no j... wait... there has been no tax increases, there has been record profits and there is no job growth)
Too bad that banks aren't awash in cash from some stimulus scam that would enable them to fund new small business...
Too bad, so sad...
Sep 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
Sep 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Sep 15, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (12)
Gotta keep the same 22000 scientists and engineers employed. 22000 whether we launch a shuttle, or not. $2billion a year whether the ISS comes down, or not.
Past saving. Hasn't done a notable thing, as an organization, since Apollo.
Sep 15, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (6)
With the amount spent on it already, it's basically has to be finished, launched, used, and even maybe eventual maintenance missions, or else it's a complete waste of money.
I'm hoping they'll get the deep surveys done asap, realize they aren't going to find too much new to argue about anyway, and then use it for planetary astronomy instead, you know, do follow-ups on the planets other observatories have discovered, etc.
So little progress has been made in propulsion technology for probes, and we'd need to be orders of magnitude faster to even matter really, so I figure the next step for space telescopes beyond James Webb is the Space Telescope Array (or make some witty acronym.)
Why not just rig a power supplies (solar) to a bunch of radio antennas and launch them into space, with some ion engines for attitude control? Nothing too fancy, like the square kilometer array, in space...
Sep 15, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Sep 15, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (5)
They're rocket scientists. They have to keep them on payroll here, because if they don't, someone else will, and for more sinister purposes: North Korea, Iran, etc.
It's blood money. We're held hostage by our own people, else they'd be "free" to leave the country if they were fired, and of course they are going to work where they have the skills: rocketry, satellite guidance, etc.
In this "global" economy, there is no such thing as loyalty or patriotism, as we all know. Both individuals and businesses will violate any law or principle, even their own principles, if they think it makes them an extra buck in the end.
Sep 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
In this case what has been going on is that NASA bureaucrats move people and expenses around from programs that will have to deliver in the short term, to projects that won't complete until the bureaucrats involved have moved on. (In many cases to jobs at contractors. See revolving door.)
I won't say that the JWST could be launched tomorrow, but most of the major work has been done and all the mirrors have been delivered. The game that is being played is to hold NASA's feet to the fire so that money for the JWST doesn't get spent elsewhere before 2018.
Sep 16, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Well, I guess after all the money invested it would be cringeworthy to cancel it. The question is, what will be done to ensure that such mess will not happen again? Let me guess, nothing..
Sep 16, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Sep 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Sep 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I support the telescope but the rest is just a jobs program.
Sep 16, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I told you Vendi! Fear not the dark side, harm you it can but defeat all truth, it cannot!
- Yoda 210
Sep 16, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Sep 16, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (8)
I hope that the JWST can analyze the exoplanets that the Kepler mission discovered. I'm disappointed that it's taking so long though, they originally planned a launch for 2015 and now they're thinking 2020.
Sep 16, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
"Master 210, not victory. The shroud of the dark side has fallen. Begun, the Ditto Head War has!"
Sep 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
It isn't your money. You are a Czec and not an American.
Ethelred
Sep 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
An excellent point, Beard, but here's the quibble: you can subtract Social Security from the budget, as it is not part of it, being fully funded by direct taxpayer contribution. It is a pension fund, and not part of the operating budget of the Federal government.
I suspect that the JWT was saved more through the efforts of private defense and aerospace contractor lobbying than as the result of taxpayer/constituent outrage, but am still happy to see this outcome.
Sep 17, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Nothing is final until a budget is passed.
Sep 18, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
And the Democrat led Senate has not passed a budget for over 800 days.
Sep 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Damn. I thought the anti V.D. little boys would finally win one.
Sep 18, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
The problem at NASA is the same as with many other projects run by all branches of the US government. The biggest problem is probably the way they write requirements that certain percentages of the project must be done in certain states, even though there might already be a facility in another state that is better suited to do the job. NASA needs to consolidate into a few facilities and concentrate the knowledge pool. Why is there a NASA office in New York, for example? Yeah, lets open an office in the most expensive place possible. That sounds good.
Sep 18, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Expensive space program is bad because it means proportionaly less will be achieved in space for the same cost. Remember that when someone whines about NASA costs.
Sep 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Have you been paying attention to the Republican Presidential debates? Perry says it is a Ponzi scheme, and the press fries him for it for all the wrong reasons. I am on Social Security. I'm not collecting the money I put in, but the money you put in this month. The "Social Security Trust Fund" is seen by politicians as a way to finance the National Debt at lower than market rates. In other words, the money isn't there, it was squandered by politicians of yesterday, and can't be "clawed back" even if the Social Security Administration wanted to try.
So if more money than is needed to pay Social Security benefits this month comes in, the excess is replaced by IOUs and counted by the Treasury as income. :-(