US satellite may crash back to Earth Sept 23: NASA

Sep 17, 2011
This undated NASA image shows a conceptual image of the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS), launched in September 1991, by the space shuttle Discovery. Originally designed for a three-year mission, UARS measured chemical compounds found in the ozone layer, wind and temperature in the stratosphere, as well as the energy input from the sun.

A 20-year-old satellite that measured the ozone layer is expected to crash back to Earth late next week, but NASA said it still does not know where it will fall.

The US space agency stressed that the risk to public safety from the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS) is "extremely small," and said that most, but not all, of the gear will burn up on re-entry into Earth's atmosphere.

"Re-entry is expected Sept. 23, plus or minus a day. The re-entry of UARS is advancing because of a sharp increase in since the beginning of this week," NASA said in a brief update on its website on Friday.

"Safety is NASA's top priority," it added, noting that throughout history, there have been "no confirmed reports of an injury resulting from re-entering space objects."

The decommissioned satellite could land anywhere between 57 degrees north latitude and 57 degrees south latitude, a vast swath of populated territory. Predictions will only get more precise as the landing approaches.

The UARS satellite was sent into orbit in 1991 by the .

The 35 by 15 foot (three by 10 meter) spacecraft weighed 13,000 pounds (5,900 kilograms) and toted 10 scientific instruments for measuring wind, temperature and . It was officially decommissioned in 2005.

"Although the spacecraft will break into pieces during re-entry, not all of it will burn up in the atmosphere," NASA said.

"It is impossible to pinpoint just where in that zone the debris will land, but NASA estimates the debris footprint will be about 500 miles (800 kilometers) long," the space agency said.

It also urged anyone who comes across what they believe may be not to touch it, but to call authorities for assistance.

Explore further: Best evidence yet for coronal heating theory detected by NASA sounding rocket

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Russia wants to build 'Sweeper' to clean up space debris

Nov 30, 2010

Russia is looking to build a $2 billion orbital "pod" that would sweep up satellite debris from space around the Earth. According to a post on the Russian Federal Space Agency, Roscosmos' Facebook site, (which ...

AURA satellite peers into Earth's ozone hole

Dec 07, 2005

NASA researchers, using data from the agency's AURA satellite, determined the seasonal ozone hole that developed over Antarctica this year is smaller than in previous years.

Recommended for you

Rosetta measures comet's temperature

16 hours ago

(Phys.org) —ESA's Rosetta spacecraft has made its first temperature measurements of its target comet, finding that it is too hot to be covered in ice and must instead have a dark, dusty crust.

How Rosetta arrives at a comet

18 hours ago

After travelling nearly 6.4 billion kilometres through the Solar System, ESA's Rosetta is closing in on its target. But how does a spacecraft actually arrive at a comet?

Lunar occultation of Saturn

18 hours ago

On the night of Monday August 4, mainland Australia will see Saturn disappear behind the moon. It's the third time this year that the moon and Saturn will perfectly line up, as viewed from our part of the ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

omatumr
2.2 / 5 (5) Sep 17, 2011
Thanks for the story,

Unfortunately, what goes up also comes down.

Let's hope that the trajectory can be better forecast as the satellite re-enters the atmosphere.

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
DiverseByDesign
not rated yet Sep 17, 2011
indeed.
jsdarkdestruction
3 / 5 (2) Sep 18, 2011
thank you for not spamming your nonsense oliver, i gave you a 3 because of it.
GSwift7
5 / 5 (2) Sep 18, 2011
Falling aircraft and aircraft parts are much more common and no less dangerous than space junk. We're all more likely to be killed by a co-worker with an AK-47 than space junk.

Joke: Besides, this thing isn't going to crash. It'll end up getting delayed and then get canceled due to cost overruns.
Bobamus_Prime
not rated yet Sep 19, 2011
"A NASA risk assessment places the odds of a human casualty at 1:3200. "
from SpaceWeather.com

Odds aren't that bad