Russia believes US, Israel behind Iran worm attack: official

Sep 23, 2011
A photo released by the official website of Iran's presidency shows Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during a visit to Natanz uranium enrichment facilities in 2008.

Russia believes Israel and the United States were responsible for unleashing the malicious Stuxnet computer worm on Iran's nuclear programme last year, a top official said Friday.

"We are seeing attempts of cyberspace being used by some states to act against others -- of it being used for political-military purposes," said the foreign ministry's emerging challenges and threats department chief Ilya Rogachyov.

"The only case in which experts believe the actions of states have been proven in this area ... is the Stuxnet system that was launched in 2010 against the centrifuge control system used to enrich uranium in Iran," he said.

"Experts believe that traces of this lead back to the actions of Israel and the United States," Rogachyov told reporters. "This is the only proven case of actual cyber-warfare."

Most of the Stuxnet infections have been discovered in Iran, giving rise to speculation it was intended to sabotage nuclear facilities there. The worm was crafted to recognize the system it was to attack.

Tehran has also blamed Israel and the United States for the killing of two of its nuclear scientists in November and January.

Russia picked up the construction of Iran's first from Germany in the 1990s and the unit was hooked up to the power for the first time this month.

Worried by the rapid rise of advanced technology, Moscow has spent several years pushing the United Nations into adopting new for the that prohibit countries from engaging in so-called cyber-warfare.

"We are categorically against this opportunity being secured in some sort of international agreements," said the foreign ministry official.

"We believe that the international community must agree on certain principles of establishing national jurisdiction over cyberspace."

The United States has in turn only supported initiatives that help protect the physical safety of communications cable used by the Internet, Rogachyov said.

Explore further: Google offers peek into Bhutan with Street View launch

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Computer expert says US behind Stuxnet worm

Mar 03, 2011

A German computer security expert said Thursday he believes the United States and Israel's Mossad unleashed the malicious Stuxnet worm on Iran's nuclear program.

Iran claims computer worm is Western plot

Oct 05, 2010

(AP) -- Iran claimed Tuesday that a computer worm found on the laptops of several employees at the country's nuclear power plant is part of a covert Western plot to derail its nuclear program.

Iran: Computer worm could have caused huge damage

Apr 17, 2011

A senior Iranian military official involved in investigating a mysterious computer worm targeting Iranian nuclear facilities and other industrial sites said Saturday the malware could have caused large-scale accidents and ...

Second computer worm 'hits Iran'

Apr 25, 2011

Iran has been hit with new malicious software as part of cyber attacks against the country, a military officer told Mehr news agency on Monday without specifying the target.

Recommended for you

Some online shoppers pay more than others, study shows

3 hours ago

Internet users regularly receive all kinds of personalized content, from Google search results to product recommendations on Amazon. This is thanks to the complex algorithms that produce results based on users' profiles and ...

Twitter looks to weave into more mobile apps

Oct 22, 2014

Twitter on Wednesday set out to weave itself into mobile applications with a free "Fabric" platform to help developers build better programs and make more money.

Google unveils app for managing Gmail inboxes

Oct 22, 2014

Google is introducing an application designed to make it easier for its Gmail users to find and manage important information that can often become buried in their inboxes.

User comments : 14

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

David_Tiffany
1.4 / 5 (9) Sep 23, 2011
If Israel and/or the United States had to use cyber warfare to stop a regime bent on destroying the nation of Israel, then I'm glad they did it. No one will succeed at destroying God's chosen people. 483years . blogspot . com
JRDarby
5 / 5 (1) Sep 23, 2011
Well, obviously! Who doesn't believe this?
fmfbrestel
5 / 5 (2) Sep 23, 2011
Yeah, i thought this was established fairly definitively already. I believe it was the New York Times had a piece laying it out in detail.

In other news, the US and Israel think Ahmadinejad is a douche bag.
frajo
5 / 5 (3) Sep 24, 2011
No one will succeed at destroying God's chosen people.
You and your friends are trying hard to perform exactly this. Let's hope you won't succeed.
God's chosen people don't kill innocents.
frajo
not rated yet Sep 24, 2011
"We are categorically against this opportunity being secured in some sort of international agreements," said the foreign ministry official.

"We believe that the international community must agree on certain principles of establishing national jurisdiction over cyberspace."

The United States has in turn only supported initiatives that help protect the physical safety of communications cable used by the Internet, Rogachyov said.

This passage doesn't convey a clear meaning.
Either someone is not able to represent the information in an understandable way
or someone is deliberately trying to confuse readers.

Media are active participants in distributing information.
Skepticus
1 / 5 (2) Sep 24, 2011
If Israel and/or the United States had to use cyber warfare to stop a regime bent on destroying the nation of Israel, then I'm glad they did it. No one will succeed at destroying God's chosen people. 483years . blogspot . com


I believe your ancient scribes made a serious error. It should have read:"God's Chosen Sacrificial Lambs." We all know God loves sacrificial lambs that were offered to him regularly.
pres68y
5 / 5 (4) Sep 24, 2011
If Iran would have done this to Israel, or the US, it would have been considered an Act of War!
Apparently their G_D does not believe in "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you".
LuckyBrandon
3 / 5 (4) Sep 24, 2011
Thats alot of god talk there...let be real and cut the fantasy world. Iran is a country who breeds and supports all kinds of acts of violence if it fits their goals...their own president is nothing more than a dictator, as seen when he lost the election, yet he still remains in power...but ironicially, he ISNT the power in the country...a fundamentalist islamic dippy is (Ali K...not even trying to spell)...and he is the reason the president who won, didn't win.
A country built on a fantasy land and who has publicly threatened attacks who has a problem with all things NOT islam, REALLY should not possess nuclear power BY THEMSELVES. They have the right to the technological power, however it should be supervised by nations that know how to use it, and more importantly, can tell if things are being redirected for arms that go against pacts of the UN.
kaasinees
3 / 5 (4) Sep 24, 2011
Thats alot of god talk there...let be real and cut the fantasy world. Iran is a country who breeds and supports all kinds of acts of violence if it fits their goals

How is Israel, USA or Russia any different? They aren't. Most of the violence from middle east towards Americans is generated by Americans themselves. Wouldn't you be mad when a terrorist group got Billions of dollars in your country?
They have the right to the technological power, however it should be supervised by nations that know how to use it

Wow, just wow. How competent are we with nuclear radiation? We aren't.
http://www.lutins...kes.html
http://en.wikiped...ccidents
http://en.wikiped...ccidents

And these lists are small, trust me there is a lot more nuclear "accidents", but i cant find the list right now.
LuckyBrandon
2.3 / 5 (3) Sep 24, 2011
I wasnt saying we are any different necessarily...only we send real soldiers to use primarily real tactics, not dirty underhanded fighting tactics of a coward....that applies to all 3 countries you named. You know the irony in your statement there right...america has a TON of middle easterners in it, and MOST of us have no problems with them...the smart ones come here to live better....the others are just pissed they couldnt come with. It is stupid to get t

Yes there will ALWAYS be accidents with nuclear power, no matter what the country, but Iran does NOT have the technical expertise to handle this, which is made EXTREMELY OBVIOUS by the fact they dont even have the knowledge to build their own reactor. If they want to join the nuclear countries, I'm all for it, but all of the MAJOR nuclear countries have pacts against weapons now. The ones who don't will be wiped off the face of the planet the second they try to utilize such a weapon, and NOT necessarily by the country they attacked
kaasinees
3 / 5 (4) Sep 24, 2011
only we send real soldiers to use primarily real tactics, not dirty underhanded fighting tactics of a coward

So Americans coordinating the rebels in Libya is not a dirty tactic of a coward? Running over innocents with convoys is not tactics of a coward? Using radioactive ammo. Bombing innocents. Etc? Let me guess you are a delusional American and your country is the best in the world.
the others are just pissed they couldnt come with.

Please do not speak for other people, you have no idea what these people had to go through with, and neither do i, fortunately.
Yes there will ALWAYS be accidents with nuclear power, no matter what the country

So what makes you thik iranians will be less competent than others?
but Iran does NOT have the technical expertise to handle this

That is why they have russian contractors.
Birnleitner
5 / 5 (2) Sep 24, 2011
David Tiffany is likely part of Hasbara (there are always lots of new profiles on stories like this, making similar remarks)...state-sponsored spam and propaganda... best to ignore crappola like his.

Re: nuclear power - seems to me that we've had some rather dramatic examples of how it can backfire...guess the planet just isn't that important, despite the fact that we need to live on it. It would not be beyond the US/Israel to sabotage Iran's and contaminate more of Earth with radioactive material.
Noumenon
4.7 / 5 (45) Sep 24, 2011
There is no moral equivalency wrt to Iran and the west as stupid liberals always attempt to pull out of their arse. Iran will not be allowed to get nuclear weapons. The Stuxnet is a nice way of saying hell no.
LuckyBrandon
2.3 / 5 (3) Sep 25, 2011
@kaasinees -
So Americans coordinating the rebels in Libya is not a dirty tactic of a coward?
No, this is called force multiplication and teaching people to fight for themselves to overthrow corrupt systems that hold down their own people
Running over innocents with convoys is not tactics of a coward? Using radioactive ammo. Bombing innocents. Etc? Let me guess you are a delusional American and your country is the best in the world.
no my country has gone to shit and most americans would gladly join in overthrowing and reestablishing our government...I AM however a former infantry soldier...
Please do not speak for other people, you have no idea what these people had to go through with
REALLY? I've lived under a bridge for months in the cold before I made myself someone, how about you??
So what makes you thik iranians will be less competent than others?
your own argument plays right to the fact, they have NO experience and need outside help..