Mississippi mud: More water behind river's sediment rise

Sep 29, 2011 by Mary-Ann Muffoletto
Photo credit: Terence Hubert, USGS

(PhysOrg.com) -- During the past several decades, upper Midwest state and local agencies have spent hundreds of millions of dollars on extraordinary conservation efforts to prevent the Upper Mississippi River from filling with mud, waste and excess nutrients. Yet the waterway, which winds through prime agricultural lands, has seen a ten-fold increase in sediment since the early 20th century.

Fingers point to practices and new-fangled farm implements and critics charge that soil conservation, updated tillage practices and drainage solutions aimed at fixing the problem aren’t working.

That’s not the case, says Utah State University watershed scientist Patrick Belmont, who, with a team from multiple universities and research groups, recently completed a four-year study in the region.

“Conservation practices are decreasing agricultural soil erosion,” he says. “But the decreases are being offset by accelerated erosion of stream banks and bluffs.”

The cause? More water.

“While we haven’t reduced the amount of in the river, our study shows that the source of river sediment has profoundly shifted due to a significant increase in river discharge,” he says. “It’s just gotten wetter and we’re routing more water to the river more quickly than ever before.”

Belmont and colleagues from the University of Minnesota, the Science Museum of Minnesota, Johns Hopkins University, Minnesota Geological Survey, Seattle University, the University of Illinois, the University of Pennsylvania and the GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences published findings from their study in the September 2011 online version of Environmental Science and Technology. The project was funded primarily by the National Science Foundation’s National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. Additional support was provided by USU’s Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, UM’s Limnological Research Center and the Minnesota Supercomputing Institute.

No one needs to remind the region’s riverfront residents of recent flooding events. Catastrophic floods in 1993 and 2008 floods caused economic losses in excess of one billion dollars. 2011 brought more misery as higher-than-normal snowpack melt and precipitation inundated farms and communities.

“In August 2007, a single weather event pounded parts of Minnesota with seventeen inches of rain in 24 hours,” Belmont says. “In Sept. 2010, six inches of rain covered 5,000 square miles in a 24-hour period.”

In addition to increased precipitation, water is being routed more quickly to the river via an ever-expanding network of underground drainage pipes.

“These changes in hydrology have increased the erosive power of the Mississippi and its tributaries,” he says.

Still, obvious changes in weather patterns aside, determining where the sediment is coming from and how much is transported is complicated, he says.

“Sediment is a natural part of rivers and identifying its sources and how it travels is tricky,” Belmont says. “But new tools that have become available in just the past several years allow us to track sediment as it moves through landscapes and rivers.”

To conduct the study, Belmont and his team employed geochemical fingerprinting along with a suite of geomorphic change -detection techniques, including both ground-based and aerial LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), a high-definition laser scanning tool used to map geologic surfaces.

“These tools allow us to examine areas at much higher resolution than has ever been possible,” he says. “We couldn’t have pulled off this study without this advanced technology.”

What the scientists are seeing, Belmont says, is increased erosion from stream banks and the river’s famous bluffs.

“This tells us we’re facing a new challenge in remediating nonpoint pollution,” he says. “Management efforts must expand from soil erosion and agricultural practices to factors contributing to increased runoff.”

Explore further: Hopes, fears, doubts surround Cuba's oil future

Provided by Utah State University

4.3 /5 (3 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Mississippi diverted to revive Delta wetlands

Jun 09, 2011

Wetlands around the city of New Orleans are disappearing at such an alarming rate that a University of South Carolina coastal marine scientist predicts there will be little of the marshland left by the end of the century.

Weeds and the Murray

Feb 15, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new study has revealed that human-induced changes in the flow of the Murray River has led to mass weed invasion and reduced biodiversity in wetlands along the riverbank, highlighting the need for a review ...

The kids are alright

May 26, 2011

Children should be seen and not heard... who says? A Philosophy academic at The University of Nottingham is challenging the adage by teaching primary school children to argue properly.

Recommended for you

Rising anger as Nicaragua canal to break ground

9 hours ago

As a conscripted soldier during the Contra War of the 1980s, Esteban Ruiz used to flee from battles because he didn't want to have to kill anyone. But now, as the 47-year-old farmer prepares to fight for ...

Hopes, fears, doubts surround Cuba's oil future

Dec 20, 2014

One of the most prolific oil and gas basins on the planet sits just off Cuba's northwest coast, and the thaw in relations with the United States is giving rise to hopes that Cuba can now get in on the action.

New challenges for ocean acidification research

Dec 19, 2014

Over the past decade, ocean acidification has received growing recognition not only in the scientific area. Decision-makers, stakeholders, and the general public are becoming increasingly aware of "the other carbon dioxide ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

omatumr
1 / 5 (2) Sep 29, 2011
Thanks for the story.

This points to the need for wisdom before undertaking to solve a problem.

Unfortunately, we have all been blinded by the auto-centric dogma that humans cause and can fix global climate problems.

That, and the 1967 Bilderberg dogma that Earths heat source is a ball of hydrogen, in equilibrium, generating constant heat by H-fusion, have almost destroyed public confidence in government science and engineering.

Those two dogmas have blocked progress in science for four decades (1971-2011):

http://dl.dropbox...oots.pdf

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://myprofile....anuelo09

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.