Modeling the local impact of global climate change
September 16, 2011 By Aaron Dubrow
A recent study of the Catalina Eddy performed by Kanamitsu. The figure shows the 3-hourly evolution of the eddy during two days. Kanamitsu discovered that the eddy disappears during 00Z and 03Z, which had never been reported before. This was due to the lack of high time-resolution observations. This kind of analysis is only possible using the dynamically downscaled analysis. Credit: Courtesy of Masao Kanamitsu, Scripps Institution of Oceanography
"You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows," Bob Dylan famously sang. But if you want to know how it will blow tomorrow, odds are you're going to check the forecast.
Atmospheric prediction has improved immeasurably in the 45 years since Dylan sang "Subterranean Homesick Blues." Whether you're interested in tomorrow's high or the global heat index a decade from now, forecasters can now predict the climate with far greater accuracy.
The rise of powerful high-performance computers plays a large part in those improvements. Scientists isolate the factors that influence the weather--heat, radiation, the rotation of the Earth--transform them into mathematical formulas, and use supercomputers to forecast the atmosphere in all its complexity.
And yet, those forecasts are still painted with a fairly large brush. The global climate models--upon which all official predictions are based--have a resolution on the order of 62 miles (100 kilometers) per grid point. At that level of detail, storms appear as undifferentiated blobs, and towns in the mountains and the valley seem to experience identical weather.
"It's difficult to accurately examine how river flows have changed over the last 50 years, because one grid point may contain many rivers," said Masao Kanamitsu, a veteran of the atmospheric modeling world and a leading researcher at Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
Making a weatherman
Kanamitsu knew he wanted to be a computational weather forecaster from the time he was a teenager in Japan in the 1960s. He worked his way through the world's most advanced weather research centers, first in Japan, then in Europe, and most recently in the United States.
In the early to mid-1990s, Kanamitsu used Cray systems and Japan's Earth Simulator to run global climate models. Today, he uses the Ranger supercomputer at the Texas Advanced Computing Center, the second largest supercomputer in XSEDE. XSEDE is supported by NSF's eXtreme Digital program.
A demonstration of what dynamical downscaling can achieve. The center figure is the coarse resolution analysis used to force the high resolution model. The left figure is the output from Kanamitsu's downscaling which produces an eddy, or current. This eddy is famous in Southern California due to the very cloudy and cold weather during the May-June period. The right figure is the regional scale analysis performed by National Weather Service, which utilized local observations. Credit: Courtesy of Masao Kanamitsu, Scripps Institution of Oceanography
Kanamitsu and his colleagues in the atmospheric community use a method called "downscaling" to improve regional predictions. The technique takes output from a global climate model and adds information--at scales smaller than the grid spacing--to resolve important features like clouds and mountains.
"You're given large-scale, coarse-resolution data, and you have to find a way to get the small-scale detail," Kanamitsu said.
Modeling California
Recently, Kanamitsu has been focusing on creating improved regional models for California, where small-scale weather patterns play a large role in the state's many microclimates. By integrating detailed information about the topography, vegetation, river flow and other factors into the subgrid of California, Kanamitsu has been able to achieve a resolution of 6 miles (10 kilometer) per grid point--a huge improvement over the normally accepted 62 mile (100 kilometer) per grid point.
Kanamitsu is also tackling the problem of connecting atmospheric conditions with ocean dynamics.
"Along the coast of California, there's a cold ocean that interacts with the atmosphere at very small scales," Kanamitsu said. "We're simulating the ocean currents and temperature in a high-resolution ocean model, coupled with a high-resolution atmospheric model, to find out the impact of these small-scale ocean states."
To combine all of those factors and get an answer in a short period of time requires very powerful and tightly connected supercomputers like Ranger. The results of Kanamitsu's simulations improved upon those currently in use by the National Weather Service.
Other applications
Other researchers in the community have already begun applying the downscaling results to fish population studies, river-flow changes and wind-energy applications.
"Kanamitsu's model simulations have enabled a much better resolved picture of the processes affecting wind flow and precipitation in the contemporary, historical period in California," said Scripps hydrometeorologist Daniel Cayan.
Over the course of his long career, Kanamitsu has clearly seen how improved computer modeling has changed his field--and the world.
"Thirty years ago, I was one of the forecasters," he said. "Every day, we took our computer model results to the meeting, but the forecaster in charge normally didn't look at or believe in our results. Now, forecasters believe in the models so much that some people think they're losing their skill."
As scientists seek to determine the local impact of global climate change and address those changes, accurate historical records and sophisticated regional forecasts like those facilitated by Kanamitsu's work are becoming increasingly crucial.
Kanamitsu's research on the NSF-supported Ranger supercomputer is funded by NOAA and by the California Energy Commission.
Provided by
National Science Foundation
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
18 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
1 hour ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
3 hours ago |
4 / 5 (1) |
10
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
3 hours ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (14) |
39
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Almost half of new vets seek disability
(AP) -- America's newest veterans are filing for disability benefits at a historic rate, claiming to be the most medically and mentally troubled generation of former troops the nation has ever seen.
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Sep 16, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
I fail to see the link between forecasting with a computer model and GCC. There is absolutely no way to model what the weather will be on a future day that fits with the timescales you are dealing with (30 years) with any sort of change in climate. Anyone who has ever used computer models to attempt to predict the path of even a large-scale weather event such as a hurricane will tell you that you can't predict the path of a hurricane through a certain area with any accuracy until you are within 24-48 hours. 10 days? 30 days? a year or more? I think not.
Sep 16, 2011
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (7)
I agree.
Regretfully,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
Sep 16, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
dr oliver manuel arrested for multiple counts of rape and sodomy of his children
Sep 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Sep 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
If you realize that modellers are trying to predict the climate rather than the weather, then your comment is disingenuous.
If you don't know the difference between predicting overall climate and weather on a given day, then I'll bet you that in New York City January 20, 2013 is colder than July 20, 2013, a prediction more than a year away. I'll even give you 10 to 1 odds!
But I won't bet whether or not it is raining or clear on July 20.
See the difference?
Sep 17, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Until GCC proponents can predict events like this solar flare,
www.physorg.com/n...res.html
There is no scientific link between forecasting with a computer model and GCC.
Earth is connected gravitationally, magnetically and electrically to its heat source [1] - the violently unstable core of the Sun.
Solar eruptions are examples of erratic energy transfer from the solar core [2].
References:
1. "Neutron repulsion", The APEIRON Journal, in press (2011)
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
2. "Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate", Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)
http://arxiv.org/.../0501441
Sep 17, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
I am pleased that Oliver linked to that letter without reading it. If he read it he would not have linked to it.
After reading the PDF of what Kissinger wrote to Nixon, yes all of it, it is quite clear that Oliver did not read it. It does not support his nonsense in any way what so ever. It pretty much fits my memory of what was going on at the time. The only real surprise was that the Chinese were worried that we would allow the Japanese to put troops in Taiwan and the Sino-Indian War was mentioned. I didn't really remember that war as I was only ten at the time.
There was not one single word about environmental issue of any kind.
Heck Kissinger didn't even meet Mao.
Ethelred
Sep 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Sep 19, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F ile:Kissinger_Mao.jpg
1. Assumed the validity of the
a.) Bilderberg Sun as a stable heat source, and
b.) Earth-centered model of global climate change
2. And agreed to work together to
c.) Unite nations
d.) Avoid nuclear war
e.) End the space race
f.) Stop global climate change [1]
Experimental measurements [2] falsify assumptions (a) and (b)
1. "Deep Roots of Climategate" (2011)
http://dl.dropbox...oots.pdf
2. "Neutron Repulsion", The
APEIRON Journal, in press, 19 pages (2011);
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
http://dl.dropbox...oots.doc
Sep 19, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
Have you read the letter you linked to? Why did you post it?
If you can't answer these questions Oliver I will have no choice but to think you just another spammer and start hitting the Report Abuse button. Responding to questions with the same crap is not a response and on many science sites is grounds for banning. Indeed YOU have been banned that way.
Time for another banning if you refuse to engage in reasoned discourse.
Ethelred
Sep 20, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
1. NASA News (19 Sept 2011) "The secret lives of solar flares
http://science.na...etlives/
2. "Neutron repulsion", The APEIRON Journal, in press (2011)
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
3. "Origin and Evolution of Life Constraints on the Solar Model", Journal of Modern Physics 2, 587-594 (2011)
http://dl.dropbox...5079.pdf
4. "Earth's Heat Source - The Sun", Energy and Environment 20, 131-144 (2009)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0905.0704
5. "Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate", Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002):
http://arxiv.org/.../0501441
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
Sep 20, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
_A_. Recent observations:
1. "Cycles and trends in solar irradiance and climate," WIREs Climate Change 1 (Jan/Feb 2010) 111122
_-_by NRL's Dr. Judith Lean,
www.agci.org/docs/lean.pdf
2. NASA, "Solar Flare Secrets":
http://science.na...etlives/
_B_. Observations ignored earlier:
3. "Long-Range Forecast of U.S. Drought Based on Solar Activity"
_-_by the late-Dr. Theodor Landscheidt
www.john-daly.com...ught.htm
4. "Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate", Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)
http://arxiv.org/.../0501441
_C_. Try to ban reasoned discourse here.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
http://myprofile....anuelo09
William Shakespeare: "All the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players:
They have their exits and their entrances."
Sep 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
You aren't engaged in reason or discourse so can the nonsense.
Try answering questions then you will be engaging in discourse. Lying that you are doing so is not quite the same as actually doing so.
Since you seem to need to see the questions you have been ignoring AND want to see me deal with your rubbish here the questions you must address first as I have been asking them for years now and you have been to answer.
Have you read the letter you linked to? Why did you post it?
Where is the evidence that neutrons repel each other in a way that is different from the Pauli Exclusion Principle?
More
Sep 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
How could degenerate matter form with that going on considering your contradictory claim that neutron repulsion makes Black Holes impossible despite the math not working for you at all? IF neutron repulsion stops Black Holes of all kinds forming no matter what the mass involved, as you have claimed many times, THEN the neutronium core of Neutron Stars CANNOT form due to that repulsion.
Now since I have been asking that for quite a while now AND you think you have the right to ask questions of me it is time answered mine.
ANSWER the questions Oliver.
Ethelred